Alabama Judge Asks: What if Gun Stores Were Under Attack Like Abortion Clinics?

judge-myron-thompsonIt’s no secret that in many Republican-controlled states, their legislatures continue to do just about everything they possibly can to restrict a woman’s right to have control over her own body.  While some states have passed laws requiring women to have sonograms, or be exposed to anti-abortion propaganda before having the procedure, the most popular way conservatives have tried to attack women’s rights is by making it nearly impossible for abortion clinics to operate within their state.

They pass arbitrary laws that do nothing but set requirements for abortion clinics that are so strict that it’s nearly impossible for many of them to remain open.

But of course they don’t consider it an attack on women’s rights – it’s all done in the name of “protecting women’s health.”  See, they claim that these laws are designed to protect women.  Which, of course, is a load of crap.  It’s just a “loophole” many conservative state legislatures have tried to exploit because they can’t place an outright ban on abortions.

So they figure if they can’t ban abortions, they’ll make it nearly impossible for a woman to have one.

Though no matter what conservatives personally feel about abortion, there’s one undeniable fact they continue to ignore: The right for a woman to have an abortion is a constitutionally protected right. 

Period.

Well, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson posed a very interesting hypothetical in his dissent against the Alabama law that set ridiculous standards for abortion clinics to meet in order to remain open.  If the law were to be enforced (it’s still currently in the process of appeals) it would close all but two clinics in the state.

He essentially asked, what if legislation was passed (either by the federal government or the state) which set such strict standards on firearm sales that all but two gun stores in Alabama were forced to close?

“The defenders of this law would be called upon to do a heck of a lot of explaining — and rightly so in the face of an effect so severe,” Thompson wrote. “Similarly, in this case, so long as the Supreme Court continues to recognize a constitutional right to choose to terminate a pregnancy, any regulation that would, in effect, restrict the exercise of that right to only Huntsville and Tuscaloosa should be subject to the same skepticism.”

And he’s absolutely right.  Though I’m sure many conservatives would refuse to draw the parallels between abortion rights and our Second Amendment rights.  Even though both are constitutionally protected rights.

Just look at how outraged many gun nuts get at the very mention of universal background checks on all gun purchases.  Hell, even the suggestion of the most moderate of gun regulations usually sends many of these people into a frenzy of paranoid delusion claiming that it’s a step toward gun confiscation.

Though the issue lies within the hypocrisy of conservatives.  While they champion themselves the party for “constitutional values,” they really only mean values for which they support.  If someone, or some group, is given rights with which they disagree, they’ve clearly proven that they have absolutely no problem doing everything they can to violate those rights.

And that hypocrisy is exactly what Judge Thompson was alluding to when he wrote his opinion on this case.


Allen Clifton

Allen Clifton is a native Texan who now lives in the Austin area. He has a degree in Political Science from Sam Houston State University. Allen is a co-founder of Forward Progressives and creator of the popular Right Off A Cliff column and Facebook page. Be sure to follow Allen on Twitter and Facebook, and subscribe to his channel on YouTube as well.

Comments

Facebook comments

  • WeAllKno TedNugent

    I agree that there is a clear parallel between closing gun stores in violation of the 2nd Amendment and closing abortion clinics in violation of the right to an abortion. Both would be using overly critical restrictions with the clear goal of taking away something the Constitution doesn’t allow laws to override; by hiding their real intent inside of supposedly neutral restrictions.

    But, conservatives can be against one and not the other, and still not be hypocrites. The Constitution does not spell out a right to an abortion, but it does spell out the Right To Bear Arms. The supreme court decided the abortion issue based on an implied right to privacy and conservatives disagree with that ruling. It’s no different than my opinion that the Supreme Court got it wrong in Citizen’s United, deciding corporations are people, Bush v. Gore, etc…

    And if you look at my earlier tweets to Ron Fourier today, I was calling out the fact the Republican party is absolutely dripping with hypocrisy. I can’t stand them, thier fake Christian Hate, or their endless greed. But, in this case the rights came about in very different ways. One is explicit and one is implicit. There is a substantial difference in that.

    • strayaway

      Some of you people are in danger of being mistaken for constitutional libertarians. One of the posters on this thread wrote, “Some of the regulations are unneeded.” Another poster wrote, “Abortion rights and Second Amendment rights are indeed both constitutionally protected rights.” You’re right, the Constitution does not delegate the federal government the power to regulate abortions or marriages for that matter. The Tenth Amendment is providing you with a tailwind. Next thing you know, some of you will be cutting checks to Justin Amash.

  • William Fite

    This article is total BS. First abortion and gun stores are two different activities. There are way more gun regulations than there are abortion regulations. Secondly gun stores are in the business to make a profit. They sell numerous types of guns, ammo for those guns and parts for those guns. Abortion clinics are not or there would be more.

    • June Goetz Lynne

      well …. there are not more because there are not enough doctors available … almost anyone can own a gun store … I know I can’t go and open an abortion clinic … and btw … many clinics are FOR PROFIT … many hospitals are for profit …

      • William Fite

        Hospitals I will give you, that is why I did not bring them up. And the article did not bring them up because they were talking about clinics. If it was so profitable then there would be more. No not anyone can open a gun store, there are laws that say certain people with a record cannot sell guns. There are laws and regulations on opening a gun store.

      • June Goetz Lynne

        At age 52 I have a better chance of opening a gun store and passing all of those regulations then I will of becoming a Dr.!

      • William Fite

        First off you are missing the point. A gun store sells a product. An abortion clinic (doctors) provide a service. Two different situations completely. Yes becoming a doctor is harder as it should be. You would not want some Joe blow practicing medicine on you. But as I stated in my OP, it is total BS, they cannot be compared. For an individual to become a licensed gun dealer they MUST go through a background check. If they do not pass that background check, then by law they cannot sell guns legally. This same licensed gun dealer must also perform background checks on anyone he sells a gun to for it to be a legal purchase.

      • June Goetz Lynne

        the ultimate point is if you limit accessibility its a bad thing … it could be 2 gun shops in a state or 2 car dealerships in a state … perhaps its 2 hospitals in a state …. if you wanted only 2 of something in an entire state, people would be outraged … except in this instance

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        funny how regressive troll willie boy fite didn’t respond to that!

      • Pehr Smith

        Maybe he really went duck hunting with Dick Cheney

    • Cemetery Girl

      Are you trying to say that if there was a bigger free market demand there would be more clinics despite regulations? It is not uncommon for a clinic to provide other services also, such as providing birth control, screenings, and disease treatment. They may provide those services at reduced cost for low income people.

      • William Fite

        Do legal gun stores or gun dealers sell guns at a reduced cost for low income people?

      • Cemetery Girl

        No, but a gun is not a need. Access to healthcare is a need. Screening for cervical cancer shouldn’t be a luxury.

      • William Fite

        Hence my reason this article is BS.

      • Cemetery Girl

        Other than you don’t have female reproductive organs, why is is BS? A judge questioned how people would react if regulations were to be passed that limits the number of gun stores in a state instead of clinics that provide abortion. Many clinics that do so also provide other services. Services that not just something that is wanted but needed, possibly needed for survival. Gun shops can be rather profitable (especially if you get people worked up that the government is going to make it impossible to get guns and double or triple the price); providing healthcare for those in need isn’t as profitable.

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        cupcake,,,,,,,,,,,,,not only does he not have female reproductive organs,,,,
        he doesn’t have a female
        ===================================
        why why why U so mean to that nice regressive republican trashy troll?

    • Darrian

      These are women health clinics , not abortion clinics, abortion is just one of the many services they provide. Your argument is invalid, your view is to narrow to see things as they are…

      • William Fite

        Just using the term the author used in this story. He used abortion clinics.

  • rossbro

    Women’s bodies, women’s decisions.

    • Bine646

      So tough to kill a fetus in this country- its ridiculous

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        but so easy to kill kids at a school; or our brave soldiers at a war of lies
        ==============================================
        hows that Benghazi “thang” doin’ ya???? U guys looked as graceful as always wasting American taxpayers dollars

      • Bine646

        Administration has been wasting tax dollars at historic levels- its fantastic

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        deficit shrinking at fastest pace since IKE
        =================================
        facts anathemal to u?

      • Bine646

        Hshahaha deficit but not the debtttt- good try tho. Obama said he’d eliminate that deficit (still at bush level) n cut into the debt (increasing every second). Federal reserves debt has quadrupled

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        THE DEBT is in 2 ways— and the DEFICIT is spending more than U take in. the DEBT is mushrooming mainly with incurred payment ( or NON payment) of INTEREST. Funny how U crybaby regressives said NOTHING when saint Reagan mangled the debt ( and deficit) and then the bush fellas did so even more– ( see: gw bush surplus to deficit destruction)
        face it crybaby– ur republicans are NOT the party of ” fiscal prudence”: never have been,,,,history backs this up
        =====================================
        shall we point to govt shutdown and “Benghazi” escapades as current events??? shall we? Benghazi was a great series of losses; even the newbie ( trent lowry) was made to look stupid with his honest but totally misguided attempts. Now he has to explain THAT to voters as ISSA deftly stepped aside KNOWING the outcome…

      • Bine646

        I bet yr upset repubs r poised to regain control of congress- hahahagagaga

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        that’s your comeback??
        ya need2 get ur FOX “news” show immediately!! Hannity is getting worn out

      • Bine646

        You know more about fox than I- who is Hannity n why do you like shemale porn?

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        excellent inquiry– I hope U appreciate this: gian keys is a TOTAL regressive tete sucking rightwinger from the LA calif area who I have had the dubious “pleasure” of mangling on these sites — mainly last yr circa oct/nov/dec. ( his glamour shot is pictured) in spite of my attempting civil expostulation with him regarding the ‘ state of the union” he simply waxes infantile- many example; I will not bore U. initially he said I was gay/ then black/ then unemployed( drawing govt assistance) and he of course claims not to be bigoted whilst calling me nigger and gay ETC. when I showed him my photos ( here upon avatar) he then claimed I was overweight. rest assured: I- at 6’2 1/2 210 lbs am NOT overweight. He macho’d me with regale of his physical exceptionalism; so I asked if we could possibly do a series of “tests” ( weights -REAL weights and exercises-/ basketball/ baseball toss/ and seeing who would last longer in an ocean ( he lives in LA; I in pompano beach FL right across from atlantic ocean) with say:::: 10-12 ft waves. (just staying out in them,,,,, longest)
        well; sir GIAN huffed and puffed and blew himself down. I did some research ( 1st with a very well built EX friending him of facebook; much to his-later-chagrin; then with a LA friend who is a Private investigator – basketball buddy of a friend of mine who lives in chandler(phoe) Arizona– who proceeded to unearth some stuff about gian- that he seems to have a taste for shemale ( uggh) porn. Nice conservative lad!
        I haven’t yet annoying him with THIS moniker as Im letting more “bits and pieces ” roll in on him– but he did mention ( a) his PERFECT genetics (b) he is a movie star/ done 2 beer commercials. NOTE: I went to school with Catherine hickland and lisa addeo – both well known in Hollywood- please GOOGLE them both– and neither of them ever heard of him. His perfect genes has him skinny at 5’9 1/2 174lbs. he is athletic e=nough to surf and volleyball and serious bike ride- however trust me: I would slaughet him in weightroom and in basketball I offered to give him 10 pts ( up to a agme of 25 ) while shooting exclusively with whatever hand he told me to shoot with( im very ambidexterous in hoops), he simply bawled how fat I am ( 34 waist; 46/7 chest….11.3 % body fat– me BIG cow)
        He also tells me that veronica ( ex) is fat at 5’8 136 NATURAL DD cup breats and I will place her 2 yr old beach photo up so U can see her,,,,then GIAN tells me my CURRENT GF Kathy(kat) is fat at 5’6 128 and YES: DD cup booooobies!
        Based upon his brief interactions last yr with ” Ronnie( veronica) seems MR Gian has a strong taste for drinking heavily- and might even depend upon his parents for occasional $$$ assistance at his tender age of 43.
        I have even–to annoy of course- given sir Gian some great stock( and option) tips which about 85% bore great fruit. he has no money so its fun to sublimely irritate his crybaby ass
        ========================================
        im done for now– here is veronica velasquez,,,, she is 48 now: find her on facebook! see how disgustingly obese she is? ( and she is 8 lbs lighter NOW than that photo–MOOOOO)
        Hannity? well paid actor on FOX ‘news’ who has steadily gained weight ala Limbaugh and beck and eric bolling.

      • Bine646

        What a waste of time- you think im gonna actually read that hahahaha- youve been trolled hsha

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        trolled? awww,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, u pooped again: hows the fact ur smallish non physically appealing ass cannot get any QUALITY ( see: photo) pussy?
        trolled? my gal and I are here eating sautéed sweet plantains ( naked of course) laughing at your sniveling ass….here is HER pic so U can practice your quotidian onanisms
        ======================================
        ( and I know U read it)
        now– about ur ass kicking in the Benghazi ” investigation”…………….

      • Adam Smith

        Not really.

        If Republicans take the Senate they still won’t have a large enough majority to overide a presidential veto, so it’s not like they’ll be able to pass right wing legislation. And in order to win now, the Republicans are currently busy alienating all the voters they’ll need to win the national elections in 2016. It’s a short term gain that will inflict long term damage to the GOP.

        By all means, please proceed.

      • Bine646

        Ohh so then the President will stop Congress from working huh- interesting

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        republicans actually ” work”???
        BENGHAZI !!! ABORTION ! ‘COMING 4 YOUR GUNS’ !! JEEEESUS IN MAKING LAWS !!!!
        ==========================================
        enjoy the infighting an erosion of the sh*tbag regressive republican party,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        and try not2 blister thyself with my gals photo

      • Bine646

        As you live on messageboards- do you work?

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        “work”?? as in FOR someone?? NO- but U and I have been thru this b4.
        NOTE: just acquired 2nd L.L.C. to be legal in new venture ($$$$$) of antique/classic car shows in the tri-county ( dade/broward/WPB ) areas- we get ’em organized and procure anywhere from 1500.oo to 3K per event plus 20.oo per car ( cash) ….overhead? flyers and trophies / avg 600.oo per event. we also do raffles which generate around 500.oo to 800.oo per event after purchases. occasionally I provide limited menu & drinks ( remember: im a self employed chef) so its a nice one day 10 hours that gets us about 1200.00 each.
        did U mention “work”?? I BEEEE-LEEEEVE U do “work” for someone/taxes/boss?
        mmmmmmm,,,,,,,,,,,,,, servitude! how delightfully republican-esque of ya!
        ok,,,,,,,,,, you’ve seen the gals- time to put up small man GIAN KEYS photo again to infuriate his broke quadragenarian ass.
        funny,,,,, for a crybaby employee who doesn’t respond–
        ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,!!!

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        hey “phleggo”…..
        ya’ didn’t answer my above stuff regarding SPENDING
        *********************************************************
        seems again that U are deathly allergic to facts

      • Bine646

        Na hate communicating w losers n u keep returning- sooo annoyinh

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        that would superbly explain why U just did~~~~~
        ……. try “G” at the end of annoying………….

      • Gary Menten

        It’s not tough to terminate a pregnancy if you are wealthy. If you are and living in an abortion-unfriendly southern state, you can easily fly to New York or some other state that actually respects Roe v. Wade. Or you can even fly to Canada where abortion is also legal, and have the procedure performed there. In fact before Roe v. Wade, going to another country is precisely what well-to-do Americans USED TO DO when they had this problem.

        As always with GOP logic, it’s really only the poor, the ones who can’t afford to travel someplace where abortion is legal, that are disadvantaged by this law.

      • DavidD

        GOP believes some people are more equal than others and God loves the rich because He/She /It showers them with wealth and power.
        The poor deserve what they get because God obviously hates them because they have no money.

      • Bine646

        Tough to be poor n pregnant

  • BadKitty

    Abortion rights and Second Amendment rights are indeed both constitutionally protected rights. Whatever regulations have been imposed on either of them are the ones that are deemed necessary. The point is that, if the government set up bogus regulations in order to impede gun sales (the way they have to keep abortion clinics from operating in Texas, for instance), there would be an outcry about violation of rights such as you have never heard — yet it appears to be expected for abortion access to be impeded in every way possible short of actually telling women they can’t have one.

  • MultiKdizzle

    Lets flip them.

    Require gun store employees to go through background checks and have admitting privileges at a local hospital. Require prospective firearm purchasers to view an ultrasound of a bullet wound, and go through a lengthy waiting period.

    • chaserblue

      You forgot to mention travel up to 800 miles to get your gun, but have to come back in a few days to actually purchase it.

    • Gary Menten

      Never mind an ultrasound of a bullet wound. Show them full color photos. Better still show them unedited film or video of surgeons treating gunshot wounds in the operating room.

  • Pretzel__Logic

    Stupid question. If people we attacking scalpel and forceps suppliers you might have a point.

    • Pretzel__Logic

      (it really is fun when liberals are this stupid)

      • Mrs_oatmeal

        You are missing the point.

      • chaserblue

        That’s because it’s on top of his head…

      • Pretzel__Logic

        Please. Enlighten me.

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        re read the article if U can read

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        yeah,,,,,,,,we beeee stooooopid!
        hows that bengahzi waste of americans taxpayer dollars doin’ ya?
        ——————————————————————————–

  • BkDodge42

    The courts decision is 172 pages and when looking at the section comparing the 2nd amendment to the right to have and abortion, the justice has made an interesting point.
    As some have indicated, the right to an abortion is not spelled out in the constitution, but in Roe v Wade, the justices interpreted the 14th amendment and its implied privacy rights as justification of a woman obtaining an abortion. Some question if the 14th amendment includes privacy, but since that has been the decision of the court so be it.
    In Planned Parenthood v Strange, the justice in his 2nd amendment analogy indicated that
    “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. Found in Heller, but here he indicated that Not all burdens on the right to decide whether to terminate a pregnancy will be undue, found in Planned Parenthood v Casey.”

    In Casey, undue was defined as “a state regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path…” (in Casey it was an obstacle preventing a woman obtaining an abortion, but in fitting the analogy a state regulation that places an obstacle preventing a citizen in obtaining a firearm would be undue.)
    He has in effect helped set up a precedent that would prevent undue burdens on obtaining a firearm from being enacted in Alabama. Undue and unlimited are two different standards.

    Justice Thompson may have loosened restrictions on firearm ownership. Thank you

    U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson

    • William Fite

      I think I might have heard a few liberal heads exploding.

      • Pehr Smith

        Now go duck hunting with Dick Cheney. That will make your head explode.

      • William Fite

        Apparently not.

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        brilliant troll comeback!
        now– about BENGHAZI —

      • Pehr Smith

        Did you go duck hunting with the aptly named DICK Cheney and not get shot in the face with buckshot?

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        yeah,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, just as that waste of BIG American taxpayer MONEY by regressives in the republican house ( see: republican fiscal prudence) over the now famous LACK of ANY WRONGDOING by this administration over Benghazi has our heads exploding— with MORE laughter at republicans
        =========================================
        NOTE: jesus didn’t mention abortion at all; so why do a bunch of shrivel dicked aging white trash regressives still TRY try TRY 2 tell women what to do with THEIR bodies? ( war upon women; gays and minorities continues)

      • William Fite

        The constitution does not say anything about abortions, but an activist court interpreted it that way. And do you have proof that Jesus never said anything about abortions?

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        none stated in scripture,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and that’s all U have-
        ======================================
        constitution and bill of rights wants ALL americans EQUALITY
        *******************************************************
        now,,,,about those 25 yrs comparison,,,,where were we?

      • William Fite

        You are right none stated in scripture. But does scripture state EVERY word that Jesus ever said? Don’t think so. So we will never know how he felt about abortion.

        Equality has nothing to do with abortion.

        Did you ever answer my question? And yes I did answer your questions.

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        womens equal rights EQUALS equality
        ===================================
        you answered all my questions? I mustve missed your comparison(s) with repub VS dem policies-federal- over past 25 yrs and subsequesnt effects upon ALL americans
        ======================================
        notice please how THAT inquiry never changes-word4word
        **********************************************************
        and………………since I don’t ascribe to any dead guys “prophecies” as mantra for todays legislation- it is similar to asking what lao tse said or mohammed or charlemage
        equal rights for all americans– and why is it that OLD men make rules upon WOMENS bodies???

  • Nancy

    Cool. Good point.

  • John M

    Here’s the problem with this article; Roe v. Wade did not make abortion legal! In fact, the supreme court has never actually ruled on the legality of abortion. Roe v Wade merely protected the patients right to privacy. It declared that the government didn’t have a right to know what type of procedure was being done. Thus it de facto made abortion legal. So the truth be told, if people payed attention, none of these laws would mean squat. That’s because the patient still has a right to privacy. They could pass a law that stated a women needed to do 25 jumping jack and recite the alphabet backward before getting an abortion, but since the state doesn’t have a right to know that that women is actually having an abortion, it wouldn’t matter.

    • Cemetery Girl

      Some of the regulations are unneeded. A regulation requiring an ultrasound is reasonable (as this can help verify the gestation period), but requiring the woman view the ultrasound is unneeded (and because hospitals may have policies that won’t allow a pregnant woman to view the ultrasound if there is a problem it is obviously an attempt to play on emotions.) Laws that are designed to force clinics to close are wrong. Regulations to protect health are one thing, but designing a law knowing it will force the closure of as many clinics as possible is another story. Especially since many clinics provide more than just abortion. It then limits the ability for some women to receive birth control and routine health services. The regulations do matter.

      • John M

        NONE of these regulations are needed. A doctor, not a politician is the only person capable of determining what kind of procedure a woman (or anyone) needs. Even if it is doctors that help write the regulations, it’s still wrong. The government should in no way shape or form be involved in dictating what your doctor decides is good for you or not good for you. The irony of these laws is that it’s these same politicians that scream and shout that the ACA (Obamacare) is wrong, because the government shouldn’t be involved in health care. Yet when it comes to women’s health, they don’t seem to have any problem with the government controlling what goes on.

      • Cemetery Girl

        It is probably unneeded to require an ultrasound because a doctor is likely to want to do one anyway. (It does help to get a good idea of gestation age, especially in early pregnancy. Dating by last cycle can be way off.) The regulations they push have nothing to do with care but instead are attempts to make the procedure as difficult as possible. That’s their goal. And there is no concern that these clinics also might provide other services. They don’t care if that could be the only option for getting birth control or cancer screening.

      • John M

        Of course they don’t care. This isn’t about abortion. It’s about controlling women and turning them back into second class citizens. The GOP talks and unfortunately convinces many people that they’re the party of the individuals rights. Yet they are the ones that constantly push for laws that control what the individual does. Hell, they hate the ACLU. A group whose sole purpose is to defend peoples constitutional rights. What does that say about them!

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        with the regressive tea (bag) party republicans governed by the “thinking” and writings of that illogical bible; we can see WHY they want women subservient.

      • Darren Cohen

        Do we need each of the steps needed to perform an appendectomy legislated? No, the AMA and the medical community handle it without government telling them what to do each step of the way. Abortion is no different. Doctors need to decide what is of medical necessity during any given procedure, not government.

  • Pretzel__Logic

    Here’s another beauty from the author:
    “If someone, or some group, is given rights with which they disagree,
    they’ve clearly proven that they have absolutely no problem doing
    everything they can to violate those rights.” “given rights”???? governments do NOT give rights comrade. WTH? Is this really how you people think? This is flat out frightening.

    • giankeys luvs shemale porn

      then who does give citizens RIGHTS??? idiot regressive: RIGHTS are given by GOVERNMENT VIA the voting process within legislatures. example: womens VOTING rights,,,,,, equal HOUSING rights,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
      ==================================================
      not very bright; are ya’???

      • Pretzel__Logic

        God.

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        GOD??? Hmmmmm,,,,ok I will bite!
        who’s “god”??? Buddhist? JEEESUS? allah?? which BOGUS superstitious GOD??

        YOUR piss ant god?? lemmen know– but I suspect U being a white trash regressive You will lay the JEEEESUS crap on me–
        he loser: jesus aint a god! hes a dead jew

      • Pretzel__Logic

        Your mom’s calling, she wants her computer back.

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        u just fell into the archetypal replying of all white trash regressive republican trolls,,,,,,,,
        it is SO fun dismantling and destroying you low IQ crybabies,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        especially underscored as U cannot/willnot answer easy 2 answer questions which were your topic(s) initially!
        ======================================
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,about that Benghazi ‘conspiricy’ and the failure of the ACA ——-

      • giankeys luvs shemale porn

        hey sh*tbag,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, I need no link: evidently U do NOT have the mental faculty to further your otiose argument; hence U lose,,,,,,,,,,,,,U lose,,,,,,,,u lose
        =========================================
        PRAISE JEEEEEEEEEESUS! lets all kill in GODS loving name

      • polliwogg

        So “God” gave me the right to have an abortion? Cool.