Alex Jones is Insane and Just Needs to Go Away

alexjonesThat’s it, I’ve had as much of this asshole as I can take.  Alex Jones is a pathetic jackass, plain and simple. If he vanished into a sinkhole into the lowest depths of the bowels of this planet, I wouldn’t feel the least bit sad.  In fact, I’d probably crack open a beer and light a sparkler.

This pile of crap is going around promoting the idea that the Boston Marathon bombing is some government conspiracy.

He’s saying that the bombing at the Boston Marathon has been conducted under a “false flag.”  You see, the term false flag is a naval term from long ago where naval ships would fly flags not of their origin to avoid attack.  They flew these “false flags” to cover up the truth about what kinds of ships they actually were.

But let me give you a little bit of background information on this parasite.

Alex Jones is a Libertarian, and founder of a radical right-wing website which I will not mention, because I refuse to give him any kind of free publicity.

You want to know what a whack job this guy is?  Glenn Beck—yes Glenn Beck, has called this guy a “crazy person.”  You heard that right, the man who wants to start a cult in Texas, thinks Alex Jones is insane.  That should tell you enough, but I will continue …

Here’s a quick list of a few conspiracy theories perpetrated by Alex Jones:

I’m going to stop there, though there are many more.

This guy is the worst form of scum.  He thrives on fear, anger, paranoia and hate.

Oh, and he’s also a complete fraud.  You see, using these conspiracy theories for “plots” he makes quite a lot of movies, and host a radio show—which make him a lot of money.

There aren’t enough vulgar words to describe my disdain for this pile of garbage.

I would encourage all who can to visit this psychopaths Facebook.  Then when you get there, feel free to write a nice little message on his Wall telling him what a pile of trash you think he is.

Then again, calling Alex Jones a pile of trash, a sack of shit, a parasite, a scumbag, a human being—-is an insult to every single one of those things.

Allen Clifton

Allen Clifton is a native Texan who now lives in the Austin area. He has a degree in Political Science from Sam Houston State University. Allen is a co-founder of Forward Progressives and creator of the popular Right Off A Cliff column and Facebook page. Be sure to follow Allen on Twitter and Facebook, and subscribe to his channel on YouTube as well.

Comments

Facebook comments

  • Caleb Rice

    reminds me of General Ripper from Dr. Strangelove, “they’re trying to poison our precious bodily fluids”

  • How do really feel? Luv you RM, I always learn something new when I watch your news show, thank you for keeping us informed!

  • Dana

    Those are nouns there I believe, not adjectives.

    • That is correct. Calling him “insane” or “loud” would be an adjective. 🙂

    • rosewine

      Yep – those are nouns.

      • The Educated

        adjective – a word used to describe a noun/verb
        noun – a person, place, or thing
        so David is correct with his answer

  • Chrissy Manson

    I love Alex Jones …maybe you,, Mr. Clifton ..are just one of the sheeple out there that believe that their government is on your side …..WAKE UP …..I guess you are a big REM fan …….because you are one of those ” Shiny Happy People” that believe it the “End of the world as we know it and I…………. feel fine !” Enjoy drinking the Kool-aid that is being given to you with your free Obamaphone and sleep better knowing that your rights are being taken away from you but you are promised that you will be safer.without them ….

    • Did you two meet at the asylum?

    • John

      Ahahahahaha! Crazy people like this make life more interesting.

    • “Sheeple,” “Kool-Aid,” “Obamaphone.” Don’t you Alex Jones fanatics have anything original to say other than choice key words? And they call us “sheep…”

      • Nasty

        You are sheep. You follow blindly.

    • John420

      One of his cult followers. When did you give up free thinking Crissy?

    • how stupid are you . nothing but a pathetic excuse for a big pile of dog turds.

    • If you’re going to defend your beliefs please please please do your homework first. The “Obamaphone” was established under Bush and was Reagan’s idea (for low cost phone service to the poor). President Obama had nothing to do with the “Obamaphone”. To those who discredit Alex Jones I ask, have you looked into his claims and been able to 100% disprove them? If not, then let the man have his free speech and get over it. I have been working all semester on an English paper with the subject of conspiracy theories and have become very familiar with Beck and Jones. They ask questions that have never been answered, which is honestly what everyone should be doing. Is Jones 100% correct on his theories, probably not. Is the ‘official’ story we are given on the news 100%, most likely not. Most likely the truth is a mixture of both official story and conspiracy theory. Allen, I follow you on Facebook but after this low and unintelligent crap I am thinking about whether or not I should continue to. To say you want progress then turn around and stoop low enough to name calling and insults is the opposite of progress. Please thank about that.

  • The sad thing is that his calling every tragedy a government plot is taking away from the truth because noone will believe the conspiracies that are true because he is crying wolf.

    • at least he tells SOME truth , unlike the Mainstream Media , which tells virtually NONE !

    • Elliott

      How are you so sure there is no wolf?

  • I HOPE SOMEONE INVESTIGATE HIM AND HIS ORGANIZATION!! SOUND LIKE HE MAY BE FLYING A FASLE FLAG!!! AND COVER UP!! HE SURE STEPED OUT THERE EARLY WITH HIS OPINON!!!

  • By the way what is wrong with being a Libertarian? It maybe better than what we have running the show now and in the past.

    • He gives Libertarians a bad name.

    • Der Antichrist

      Exactly!

    • Is it? Find us one credible link to a **successful** libertarian government, anywhere in the world, at any time in history, and then we’ll chat s’more. Key word here is “successful”.

  • me

    There’s a sucker born every minute, too bad there are just as many charlatans who will take advantage of them.

    • like mainstream media readers !!

    • Nasty

      That’s true! All of them voted for Obama.

      • I voted for OBama. I campaigned for Obama, We WON, you LOST, so, that makes you the sucker, or a better word would be ‘LOSER.’

      • Danceintherain

        Thank you Sally. I too voted for Obama, and I campaigned for him. We won, they lost, and although I find it rediculous, it is disheartening to see the republican party make such utter fools of themselves. What is worse is that there are so many ignorant sheep out there that are willing to follow them and take everything that they say as gold.

      • nasty

        Actually it makes me the educated one and you the stupid one. But since you want to play childhood games; I won the gun debate in the Senate and you lost. So that makes you AND Obama the Suckers. Oh and the Senate is led by the Democrats, a fact I’m sure you didn’t know. Oh and that goes for “danceintherain” also.

  • noen

    Alex Jones believes that Osama Bin Laden is not dead and that the whole thing about killing him was staged to make Obama look good.

    Alex Jones has had David Icke on his show and while he doesn’t fully buy into “the Queen of England is a baby eating lizard from space” he doesn’t discount it either and considers David a fellow traveler.

    Alex Jones is really worried that the TSA might fondle his testicles. He worries about it and thinks about it A LOT and will go into great detail about how the TSA is sexually molesting people. Great detail. Over and over and over. He is horribly afraid they will molest him so he refuses to travel by air but he thinks about the possibility the TSA will touch him sexually repeatedly and is fixated on it.

    Alex Jones believes in every conspiracy theory you can think of as long as it doesn’t involve UFOs or aliens. He thinks they might be demons.

    Alex Jones believes that at the highest levels virtually all government officials are part of one giant pedophile ring. That child protection services steal children from poor people (white or black, he’s no bigot with his paranoia) who are then sold to be used by the elites (read: Jews) for their wild sex orgies. Alex thinks a lot about all the wild perverted sexual orgies the ruling class is having all the time.

    • Der Antichrist

      You certainly seem to have enough time to listen/watch him….half of your statements are wrong, but like I said, you must be a casual listener….lol!
      DOUCHE!

    • Inquiring minds want to know….does he think about the TSA fondling his testicles as *much* as Rick Santorum obsesses about gay sex?

    • mleanos

      Your statements are wrong, and make you sound ignorant. I’m not saying you are, but that’s the impression I get.

      It sounds, to me, like you personally think about Alex thinking about those orgies, and the TSA fondling him all the time.

      You’ve taken a lot of things out of context, and also have taken others way too far with your own interpretation of what Alex says. You probably have such strong views in life, that limit your ability to see perspectives outside your own.

      • noen

        My statements are not wrong. Do a search on youtube and watch his shows where he has David Icke on and his belief that Osama Bin Laden was not killed by the US and that the photos of him were faked is easily confirmed on his website. That Alex believes the “globalists” are involved in a world wide pedophile ring is likewise an easily confirmed fact. That Alex obsesses about the TSA molesting people and his worries that he would be molested if he submitted to the TSA is also something you can easily verify by watch just about any of his past shows.

        “It sounds, to me, like you personally think about Alex thinking about those orgies”

        Nice try, pathetic but nice try. No, I don’t think about Alex much at all. I paid attention to him for awhile until I got a good sense of what he’s about and haven’t really thought about him since then. Alex is a deeply troubled man prone to rage. He is paranoid, stupid and ignorant. Not a good combination.

      • deckbose

        Notice how not one of the three people contesting your post offered a bit of specificity or any kind of evidence as to why you “are wrong” or are how you’ve “taken a lot of things out of context.” Apparently, it’s sufficient nowadays to make claims without a shred of support — well, at least it is for people who believe Alex Jones isn’t a buffoon of titanic proportions.

    • Nasty

      Did you see a body? I didn’t. You do understand that Osama was a CIA agent don’t you?

  • George Bush

    He’s a got a history of entertaining.

  • tony langley

    but hes right so how is he insane 1 month before the bombing family guy gave hints about the marathon are all things like that just a coincidence ?

    • char

      Dumb. Doesn’t mean anything could have got idea there…so he watches family guy. ..big whoop

    • Watch the actual episode. Jones took clips from the very start and near the end of the episode to make that video. The two clips had nothing to do with each other

  • Allen, thanks for the worthless article, now I feel 3% less intelligent from reading it. Your insults really show what kind of person you are, and that is pathetic. I am not a fan of Alex Jones, but, I am not one to stand in line with the popular fools wanting to fit in. Ya know those who believe anything the media and news outlets tell them.

  • What the hell are you so mad about. We have mainstream media telling us lies, whats the difference if this guy does too. Chime sheeple.

  • LRedBeam

    Several Republicans of my acquaintance believe conflicting conspiracy theories–simultaneously. They are deeply disappointed with their party, for the failure of its leaders to embrace Alex Jones as a successor to Limbaugh, with whom they now find fault.

  • Jake Criss

    Flagged you as inappropriate and just filed a complaint with law enforcement. You SHOULD NOT have access to the internet. How dare you threaten people you sick FOOK!

    • Chrissy Manson

      WTF Flagged you as inappropriate and just filed a complaint with law enforcement.you Sir Jake are a douche It is called freedom of speech ………or have you forgot about it….brain dead moron. …Rock on Der Antichrist

      • Jake Criss

        Threatening people is not freedom of speech you whacked out twit.

      • Nasty

        It is if you don’t ACT on it.

      • Der Antichrist

        no…they don’t like freedom of speech either, ya know cause its one of the tenets of that pesky constitution, face it, these people are the new nazis!

      • The Educated

        you have freedom of speech, however, you can not make threats against someone especially death threats….that is by law a criminal offense no matter what state you live in…and btw for you less educated people in the field of religion and its repercussions on political moves…by giving Bin Laden a proper burial he cannot be seen as a true martyr, but had we dance in the streets with his head on a pole (which it seems many right wing nuts would be all for) it would have sparked not just the terrorists but the rest of the extremist and quite possibly all of the Islamic world which btw are not the murderous bloody people that american media (specifically right wing) make them out to be since at most 15% of muslims make up the extremist and within that 15% roughly 1-2% partake in terrorism. Plus, do any of you think – burial at sea – sea has submarines – pick up body later – etc

      • You can spew your paranoid stupidity all day long, we don’t care. But when you threaten violence, it goes to a whole different level. You wouldn’t know the constitution if it bit you square in the ass, you’re just one of the fringe nutjobs who revels in hate and guns and has a tiny penis. Go ahead, talk big. Your bluster makes us laugh, thinking you can take on the entire government military. LMAO!

      • Nasty

        Some one spends a lot of time thinking about their penis. But that’s ok.

    • Der Antichrist

      good luck with that…

    • Nasty

      Liberal! Wants to shut own the conversation, IF you don’t agree with him. TYPICAL Liberal.

  • You aren’t “The People”, you’re just one part of a small paranoid cult.

  • Der Antichrist thanks for the Excellent post! The stupid
    Patriot Act was signed and so it shall be that every citizen and country are suspects but those who wrote it. I don’t know Alex, but Der Antichrist’s comment made it clear
    —- Yes, no country out there are imminent threats to this nation.
    Forty million Americans suffering from inadequate health care is an
    imminent threat. The high cost of prescription drugs is an imminent
    threat. The ravages of unemployment is an imminent threat. Guns, drugs
    and violence are imminent threats. The slowdown of the economy is an
    imminent threat, and so, too, the devastating effects of corporate fraud
    is an imminent threat. What’s your excuse that you follow like cattle?

  • I’m a little lost why we needed to mention he’s a Libertarian. This isn’t an accurate representation of ALL libertarians in the slightest. I would say MOST aren’t like him.

  • Jake Criss

    Get a therapist and plenty of meds fruit loop.

  • Actually the government is poisoning our drinking water with flouride, but the rest of that is pure lunacy. No really our water has literally got poison in it. That is not a conspiracy.

    • What government? Flouride isnt being added to my water. I dont believe its harmful at the dilution its being added municipalities water supply, and there’s conclusive evidence that says otherwise. If fluoride is being added to your water supply its not because the federal government is requiring it. It was a decision made by your municipality and if you think its such a terrible threat to your health im sure you can make your case start a petition collect the required signatures take it to the city council and try to get some kind of intiative or referendum.

      • mleanos

        Do some research on this subject, Brad. Some cities in the US just don’t understand that Fluoride is poisonous, or that it is even in their water supply. It’s a money making scheme that some gov’t officials in the US are a part of. I’m sure you can find much info on the subject if you googled it. And in the doses it is being consumed, is not immediately dangerous; Fluoride would kill you on contact in it’s pure form. Instead, anyone that is consuming water that has this poison added to it, is slowly being poisoned. This causes many health problems, including severe neurological damage.

      • Everything you stated simply isnt true. You do some research, real research, not the crap conspiracy theorists considered reasearch(reading each others websites full of half truths and outright lies). Find the studies, credible peer reviewed scientific studies, that have been done and read them in their entirety.

      • Brent Holman

        Someone should research any correlation between high levels of flouride, & whack conspiracy theorist densities.

    • G Wagner

      Chlorine is also poison.

      • Alcohol is poison. Coffee, tea, chocolate, newts, and puppies. All part of a big government conspiracy to kill all the citizens. Then there will be no one left to govern. Really. 🙂

      • deckbose

        Puppies? That’s going too far!

    • deckbose

      Yeah, I saw that in Dr. Strangelove, too. Precious bodily fluids. The difference is, I knew it was a work of fiction.

    • Brent Holman

      At high doses flouride is dangerous because of the incidence of ‘free radicals’, also it is I think,an emetic. They put it in toothpaste too.
      I’m more concerned about breathing lead,mercury, strontium, etc. pumped into the atmosphere by the ton. But then I smoke tobacco, so there. Also, I received a tainted vaccine when I was a kid, & it destroyed my adult teeth while they were still in my jaws. And i missed out on the class action settlement because of the Dentist Conspiracy to make me expensive new teeth.

  • how can you debunk an episode of Family Guy? It was on TV for god sake. i quickly rushed to my On Demand and apparently that episode is too old to view now, and I can’t find it on Youtube anywhere. WTF does that even mean to debunk the episode. You mean we aren’t going to blame Family Guy because it’s too good of a show? lol Ok then. Let’s blame violent video games and TV for gun violence, but let Family Guy slide because, that guy hosted the Oscars.

    • Snopes is your friend. It was footage of different shows that someone cobbled together to make it look like a ‘conspiracy’.

      • noen

        BBBUT…. BBBUT IT WAS ON YOUTUBE SO IT MUST BE TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUE!!!!!

    • The clips cobbled together were 15 minutes apart and unrelated to each other.

  • I wish he’d stop calling everything a conspiracy and stick to real conspiracies. Lots of fishy shit with 9/11, such as the Patriot Act being similar to a bill JFK refused to sign shortly before being shot, it’s expediency in being passed, and government officials literally dismissing warnings that it was going to happen even up to 9/10/01 – on top of still training Al Queda up to August 2001. Alex lost his credibility when he started talking about shape shifting lizard people, though.

    Used to follow the website… somewhat regret it after the lizard people stuff. Was a “just walk away… slowly…” moment. And hell, False Flags do happen, but not as often as he claims, and boston sure as fuck was not that. Nor was Sandy Hook or Newtown. Wanting background checks =/= infringing on rights.

    • HankHH

      How do you know who was behind the Boston attack so soon? I’d really like to see your evidence.
      Also, I hope you know that the FBI was involved with the 1993 WTC bombing. That’s not a conspiracy theory, but a conspiracy fact.

      • Brent Holman

        Your source for this?

      • HankHH

        You have a computer, so why not learn how to use google and do some research? The FBI was working very closely with the people who bombed the WTC in 1993. Google “1993 wtc bombing fbi informant” and do some reading. Some thinking would help you, too.

  • Der Antichrist

    Thanks for deleting my original post, here it is again, good luck with reporting it to the authorities idiot(s)… Where did I make any threats? Cowards are what you are…

    Sorry but its asshole leftist liberal idiots who need to go away, with a
    bullet in your ass… Our government has been staging false flags for
    years, maybe if you did your research of history instead of laughing at
    everyone else cause you think your on the winning team, you might be
    forced to… Look up “Operation Northwoods”, “Operation Gladio”, shall I go on? History always repeats itself… There is NOTHING progressive about you people, or your Lean Forward bullshit campaign everything you do is 2-steps backwards, like changing the constitution to suit your needs, cause you hate what our country was founded on… I am no republican, no conservative, just someone with a distaste for injustice, who applies common sense, in a world getting more bizarre thanks to assholes like yourself! Alex is not god, and he ain’t my saviour, but the only guy not afraid to be called a loudmouth and speak the truth, which I have been doing my whole life! It takes balls to go
    against the grain than follow the herd, which is what you do… Just
    like 10,000 ants can take down an elephant, your expected to cower, alex
    won’t, I won’t and lots of others won’t, thats why when confronted with
    your type in real life situations, I laugh in your face! Might is right, and I will always beat your idiots down! I am no christian either, so f#ck you and your labels! You think the system that is going to enslave and destroy us all will protect YOU, moron!? You are what we call a “useful idiot” your government loves you… We the people DESPISE YOU!

    • Wow,,, see how crazy some people are? I agree the posts was not professional but i also agree Alex Jones is insane.

      You think he is doing this because he has the balls to speak the truth? He is getting rich off his websites, he sells survival kits by promoting conspiracy theories that never come true and just make him rich. Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Anne Coulter,,, all frauds who are making millions off people like you.

      Go ahead, keep supporting this nonsense. You are the one who is the sheep.

      • so why doesnt mainstream media ever mention false flags ??

      • noen

        They do. They mention them in context of insane nutcases like you who believe every terrible even is a false flag. There have been false flags in history but not as many and not the ones you think.

        Why? Because you’re a fucking moron that’s why.

      • Brent Holman

        Good one. I like the Pearl Harbor one…It says:
        We let them attack us, and then sail away. Yah sure.
        We would have sent their fleet to the bottom.
        People do not operate the way paranoids think they do, because most people are NOT paranoid.

    • Brent Holman

      You are really a nut. Faced with your own puny meaningless mortality, you insist the whole world come to an end, along with you.

      “When your young, Daddy is the scariest thing you can think of, when you get older ‘THE GOVERNMENT’ becomes the scariest thing you can think of, & you KNOW ALL THEIR SECRETS! Now you are equal to the scariest thing you can think of…”

      The europeans think we are ‘quaint’ in our 1 size fits all conspiracies. They have had multi-country court intrigues for a long time. They know conspiracies. Also, the Progressive tradition was embraced by Republicans in a big way here in Wisconsin, which our current a$$hole Gov. is destroying.

      Your post seems to be a simple rant against Democrats, who we all KNOW equal Communist,Socialist,Far Left, Progressive, Nazis, somehow.

      Sheesh.

  • Der Antichrist

    “Alex Jones is a Libertarian, and founder of a radical right-wing website
    which I will not mention, because I refuse to give him any kind of free
    publicity.”

    Oh but you have…idiot!

  • Der Antichrist

    He believes 9/11 was a government conspiracy,
    -if you don’t think so, you are clearly in denial, they certainly let it happen, just like yesterday, their intelligence is never very good or they would thwart these things…but then what rights would they have to take away under the pretense of protecting us!? Then comes more security, etc…schmuck!

    Feels a global “New World Order” exists to take over planetary control of everyone
    -really they elites like George Soros, JP Morgan Chase, The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Skull & Bones, etc, guess you never bothered to look this stuff up on that thing called the “interwebs”? Cause your too busy praising the state!?

    Believes antidepressants are “suicide mass murder pills“
    -thats why the commercials on TV f#cking say “thoughts of suicide are a side effect”? Which is what I find bizarre, but thats your multi-trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry your politicians take massive payoffs from…

    Thinks the government is poisoning our drinking water (I would
    source this but the only sites I find are his, and I refuse to link his
    page)
    -Guess your not looking to hard there pal!

    NEXT YOU WILL SAY GMO’S ARE GOOD FOR YOU!

    Guess you NEVER looked up anything about eugenicist John P. Holdren who is now Obama’s “science czar” and his books from the 70’s about how they need to reduce the earths populations and how to do it?

    It’s all there….BUT DON’T LOOK THAT UP EITHER! STAY TO THE LEFT!
    AND DRIVE RIGHT…OFF A CLIFF!!!!

    • I couldn’t have said it better myself.

    • Jarrett Wesley

      don’t speak of what you don’t know..people like you mention all this garbage simply because you heard it from somebody else. You do what Jones does..put shit into your own context, reveal one side of the coin, all so you can brag and boast about being in possession of some occult knowledge that we common folk are too brainwashed to acquire. it’s all garbage. half of what you’re right about, everyone already knows and doesn’t care..the other half..the guys cashing in on your dependability make up! and laugh all the way to the bank. so enjoy it, hope he sends you a tshirt with his fat fuckin head on it.

  • sahara

    wow is this wat ppl really waste there life wit o.O is just arguing but stupid shyt

  • This is how you stop an Alex Jones hating sheep in their tracks :

    Say to them ” He may be the worst person on earth but he still informs better than any media source on the planet ! ”

    That sends them into a cognitive dissonant spin .
    Which ever msm source they counter with , you simply say “oh so your source X tells us about the history of war-lies* , false flags , black ops , high level crime, strange “suicides”/assassinations , major govt lies , major msm lies , does it ? ”

    It’s a debate slam-dunk every time .
    Try it !

    * Where’s the TV documentary on the history of war lies ?? [This question stops sheep stone cold dead in their tracks ! ]

  • Memeremalek

    AGREE. The saddest & scariest and most exasperating of all is that he’s another wingnut given radio time and he’s garnered followers. Why is that ppl like MLK Jr., JFK Sr., RFK, Abe Lincoln are assassinated, and salamanders like this are not? Because the followers of the aforementioned type of individuals are sane and ppl who like ppl like (chuckle) Alex Jones ARE batshit nuts. Definitely going to pen a message on his FB.

    • ~~ This is how you stop an Alex Jones hating sheep in their tracks :

      Say to them ” He may be the worst person on earth but he still informs better than any media source on the planet ! ”

      That sends them into a cognitive dissonant spin .
      Which ever msm source they counter with , you simply say “oh so your source X tells us about the history of war-lies* , false flags , black ops , high level crime, strange “suicides”/assassinations , major govt lies , major msm lies , does it ? ”

      It’s a debate slam-dunk every time .
      Try it !

      * Where’s the TV documentary on the history of war lies ?? [This question stops sheep stone cold dead in their tracks ! ]

      • Where is the evidence to back up any of your claims? Show us some credible sources.

      • on what ? false flags ? just google each on that list in above post …. the lusitania story is a beauty ! ~ 2008 discovery exposes giant war lie ! .. then theres tonkin , lavon affair , uss maine , northwoods plan , gladio … and of course you know about the wmds lies !

      • thank goodness Alex Jones alerted me to them .. because the mainstream media barely ever mentions them ! .. hmmm i wonder why ? 😉

      • Because they’re not real?

      • You are comparing Lusitania to a proposed 9/11 conspiracy? Really? America trying to smuggle weapons to Britain is not the same as flying air liners into buildings.

      • your strawman , you knock it over

      • i listed credible source links above

      • DELETED BY MOD

      • HankHH

        Read up on WTC7’s free fall and symmetric drop. That is irrefutable physical proof of controlled demolition, which also destroys the government’s entire 9-11 conspiracy myth. 911speakout . org is a good place to learn about this topic.

      • So 7’s collapse is your smoking gun, even though almost every other claim about 1 and 2 has been debunked? Why bring down 7 after it had been on fire for 6 hours? Why not bring it down when 1 and 2 collapsed?

        There was no “free fall” as you say but a collapse caused by uncontrolled fires. If explosives had been used, why have their been no credible reports of explosive sounds. NISTs report is pretty rock solid, unless you care to present otherwise.

        9/11 conspiracy theorists make no sense. If 9/11 was an inside job, why not frame the Iraqis? Why a bunch of Saudis linked with Al Qaeda? What benefit was their to invade Afghanistan? You would think if the US was going to do a false flag, why not against an enemy or a threat?

      • HankHH

        Whether you believe that 9-11 was masterminded by some guy living in a cave thousands of miles away simply because “he hates our freedom”, or Bush era PNAC extremists who wanted a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a New Pearl Harbor” were behind it, you believe a conspiracy. So it make no sense to try to dismiss people as conspiracy theorists because they don’t believe an absurd conspiracy myth. WTC7’s sudden, free fall, and symmetric drop is a documented fact, that is no longer controversial or disputed. High school physics proves that this is quite literally impossible without a controlled demolition. In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward acceleration. That’s why free fall acceleration can only take place in the absence of resistance. If gravitational energy had been used to bend and crush thousands of tons of interconnected steel columns, then free fall could not have taken place. We can have free fall or we can have resistance, but we can’t have both. The only way free fall could have taken place is if the columns were destroyed by a source of energy other than gravity, and they had to be destroyed instantly, totally, and simultaneously before symmetric free fall could take place. This is basic high school physics and logic, and exactly why free fall is irrefutable physical proof of controlled demolition.

      • HankHH

        Whether you believe that 9-11 was masterminded by some guy living in a cave thousands of miles away simply because “he hates our freedom”, or Bush era PNAC extremists who wanted a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a New Pearl Harbor were behind it, you believe a conspiracy. So it make no sense to try to dismiss people as conspiracy theorists because they don’t believe an absurd conspiracy myth. WTC7’s sudden, free fall, and symmetric drop is a documented fact, that is no longer controversial or disputed. High school physics proves that this is quite literally impossible without a controlled demolition.

      • Brent Holman

        You are simply wrong, or misinformed. or both.

      • HankHH

        Whether you believe that 9-11 was masterminded by some guy living in a cave thousands of miles away simply because “he hates our freedom”, or Bush era PNAC extremists who wanted a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a New Pearl Harbor were behind it, you believe a conspiracy. So it make no sense to try to dismiss people as conspiracy theorists because they don’t believe an absurd conspiracy myth. WTC7’s sudden, free fall, and symmetric drop is a documented fact, that is no longer controversial or disputed. High school physics proves that this is quite literally impossible without a controlled demolition. In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward acceleration. That’s why free fall acceleration can only take place in the absence of resistance. If gravitational energy had been used to bend and crush thousands of tons of interconnected steel columns, then free fall could not have taken place. We can have free fall or we can have resistance, but we can’t have both. The only way free fall could have taken place is if the columns were destroyed by a source of energy other than gravity, and they had to be destroyed instantly, totally, and simultaneously before free fall could take place. This is basic high school physics and logic, and exactly why free fall is irrefutable physical proof of controlled demolition.

      • HankHH

        Whether you believe that 9-11 was masterminded by some guy living in a cave thousands of miles away simply because “he hates our freedom”, or Bush era PNAC extremists who wanted a “catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a New Pearl Harbor” were behind it, you believe a conspiracy. So
        it make no sense to try to dismiss people as conspiracy theorists because they don’t believe an absurd conspiracy myth. WTC7’s sudden, free fall, and symmetric drop is a documented fact, that is no longer controversial or disputed. High school physics proves that this is quite literally impossible without a controlled demolition.In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward acceleration. That’s why free fall acceleration can only take place in the absence of resistance. If gravitational energy had been used to bend and crush thousands of tons of interconnected steel columns, then free fall could not have taken place. We can have free fall or we can have resistance,
        but we can’t have both. The only way free fall could have taken place iif the columns were destroyed by a source of energy other than gravity, and they had to be destroyed instantly, totally, and simultaneously before free fall could take place. This is basic high school physics and logic, and exactly why free fall is irrefutable physical proof of controlled demolition.

      • deckbose

        Still clearly a copy and paste. And every time you reprint it without attribution, without quotation marks, that digs your plagiarism hole a little deeper.

      • HankHH

        I wrote it. Can you address the facts and evidence, or is your “intellect” limited to whining about trivia?

      • deckbose

        It is clearly a copy and paste job. That is irrefutable from the formatting. If you wrote it, as you claim, then you copied and pasted from another site where you originally posted it. Can I have that link, please.

      • HankHH

        Correct, I wrote it previously. Typing it repeatedly would be a waste of time. The reason it appears more than once is that it didn’t show up the first couple of tries. Do you disagree with anything I’ve written? If so, can you tell us what and why? Requesting a link to where I wrote it previously is silly, since the points I make are the same. You’re avoiding a discussion of the facts and evidence because they prove your conspiracy myth to be impossible.

      • deckbose

        So, let me see if I’ve got this right. You have a prepared comment that you copy-and-paste whenever appropriate, but you’re reluctant to provide the link from which the copy-and-paste was lifted. You seem to be missing the point here. The Internet is full of liars. When there is evidence that a certain poster may not be presenting him or herself legitimately, the first thing you must do is determine whether this poster is honorable enough to warrant a debate. Plagiarizers do not fit into that category. People who steal the comments of others, without attribution, do not merit civil discourse. So I’m trying to find out how honorable you are, because you’re giving every indication that you are not. Do not ask me about “your” facts until you establish that they are indeed yours. It’s a simple request: provide the link from which you copy-and-pasted.

      • HankHH

        No, you don’t have it straight. There’s no plagiarism or lies, and I have used that little write up on Facebook and discussions after other articles. Your nonsensical demand is *simply* your pitiful attempt at creating a lame excuse for avoiding a sincere discussion of the hard evidence. I wrote this, too. Do you disagree with any of the five points? If so, can you tell us which one(s) and why exactly?

        1.In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward acceleration.

        2. Therefore, free fall acceleration leaves *no* gravitational energy remaining to bend, buckle, snap, or shear structural steel supports.

        3. Even NIST stated that free fall can only take place when their are no structural components below.

        4. Obviously, the structural supports have to be removed *before* free fall can take place.

        5. If gravitational energy was used to bend, snap, buckle, and shear support columns, then free fall acceleration could not take place. The massive resistance would have consumed gravitational energy and slowed or stopped the acceleration.

      • Brent Holman

        Your basic premise is flawed. there is no evidence of ‘free fall’ or ‘free fall in a vacuume’ Trade 7 collapsed exactly as one would suppose, if they bothered to do any real, unbiased research.

      • HankHH

        You “think”: there’s no evidence of free fall because you refuse to get informed or study the evidence. A simple google search for “NIST admits WTC7 free fall” reveals that WTC7’s free fall symmetric drop is one of the few documented facts upon which which both government hired shills and independent researchers agree. You should do some basic research before you post. As it is, your posts merely confirm the widespread belief that people who still believe the government’s impossible 9-11 cave man conspiracy myth do so out of blind faith and extreme ignorance of the facts.

      • HankHH

        Whether you believe that 9-11 was masterminded by some guy living in a cave thousands of miles away simply because “he hates our freedom”, or Bush era PNAC extremists who wanted a “catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a New Pearl Harbor” were behind it, you believe a conspiracy. So
        it make no sense to try to dismiss people as conspiracy theorists because they don’t believe an absurd conspiracy
        myth. WTC7’s sudden, free fall, and symmetric drop is a documented fact, that is no longer controversial or disputed. High school physics proves that this is quite literally impossible without a controlled demolition.In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into
        downward acceleration. That’s why free fall acceleration can only take place in the absence of resistance. If gravitational energy had been used to bend and crush thousands of tons of interconnected steel columns, then free fall could not have taken place. We can have free fall or we can have resistance, but we can’t have both. The only way free fall could have taken place iif the columns were destroyed by a
        source of energy other than gravity, and they had to be destroyed instantly, totally, and simultaneously before free fall could take place. This is basic high school physics and logic, and exactly why free fall is irrefutable physical proof of controlled demolition.

      • Controlled demolitions never start at the top of a building.

      • HankHH

        A simple youtube search proves you wrong. One thing that most followers of the government’s impossible 9-11 conspiracy myth seem to have in common is a strong aversion to doing research and thinking for themselves.

      • Brent Holman

        You are correct. I was examining the floor plans for the twin towers within 90 minutes of the event. That explained alot.

      • Brent Holman

        True! Most 911 truthers think in the case of tower1 & 2 that you take 110 stories & divide by the time it took to hit the ground, which is erroneous, as the collapses began on floors much lower than the roof. Also, there were 5 to 7 stories remaining at ground level. Also, it’s difficult to tell just when the collapse ended, exactly.

      • deckbose

        Nice copy and paste. Don’t you think you should attribute the excerpt?

      • HankHH

        Not sure what you’re referring to.Do you disagree with anything I’ve written? If so, can you tell us what and why,exactly?

      • Again, here’s what made WTC7 collapse. There’s no conspiracy here:

        Yeah, big conspiracy. WTC7 collapsed due to uncontrolled fires and a failed sprinkler system which the fire dept didn’t focus on because they had some larger problem to deal with (I just can’t recall for the life of me what that would have been).

        As the North Tower collapsed on September 11, 2001, heavy debris hit 7 World Trade Center, damaging the south face of the building[30] and starting fires that continued to burn throughout the afternoon.[9] The collapse also caused damage to the southwest corner between Floors 7 and 17 and on the south face between Floor 44 and the roof; other possible structural damage included a large vertical gash near the center of the south face between Floors 24 and 41.[9] The building was equipped with a sprinkler system, but had many single-point vulnerabilities for failure: the sprinkler system required manual initiation of the electrical fire pumps, rather than being a fully automatic system; the floor-level controls had a single connection to the sprinkler water riser; and the sprinkler system required some power for the fire pump to deliver water. Also, water pressure was low, with little or no water to feed sprinklers.[31][32]

        After the North Tower collapsed, some firefighters entered 7 World Trade Center to search the building. They attempted to extinguish small pockets of fire, but low water pressure hindered their efforts.[33] Over the course of the day fires burned out of control on several floors of 7 World Trade Center, the flames visible on the east side of the building.[34][35] During the afternoon, fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30.[30] In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon.[36]At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.[37] During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.[38] Around 3:30 pm FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro decided to halt rescue operations, surface removal, and searches along the surface of the debris near 7 World Trade Center and evacuate the area due to concerns for the safety of personnel.[39] At 5:20:33 pm EDT the building started to collapse, with the crumble of the east mechanical penthouse, and at 5:21:10 pm EDT it collapsed completely.[2][40] There were nocasualties associated with the collapse.

      • HankHH

        Aaron, you don’t seem to understand the concept of free fall, or that it
        can only take place in the absence of resistance. Do you disagree with
        any of the points below? If so,which one, and why, exactly?
        1.
        In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of
        its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward
        acceleration.
        2.
        Therefore, free fall acceleration leaves *no* gravitational energy
        remaining to bend, buckle, snap, or shear structural steel supports.
        3. Even NIST stated that free fall can only take place when their are no structural components below.
        4. Obviously, the structural supports have to be removed *before* free fall can take place.
        5.
        If gravitational energy was used to bend, snap, buckle, and shear
        support columns, then free fall acceleration could not take place. The
        massive resistance would have consumed gravitational energy and slowed
        or stopped the acceleration.

      • Brent Holman

        Your basic premise is wrong. Trade7 collapsed as one would expect. The Battalion chief knew it was coming down, & they pulled back, & it collapsed. End of story.
        Conjecture based on erroneous data never proves a conclusion.

      • Nasty

        Based on this, Sandy Hook was also a Government Operation.

      • HankHH

        What do you imagine WTC7’s free fall, symmetric drop, vaporized steel columns, and the discovery of nanothermitic material in steel and dust samples have to do with Sandy Hook? Strange way of thinking, to say the least…

      • Brent Holman

        Who ‘discovered’ ‘nanothermic’ material? Do you not suppose that some sensitive computer systems in an emergency response center might have built in fail safes? Seems to me a small amount of that could render a hard disk cooked, very quickly. (Ala Mission Impossible)

      • Brent Holman

        The real Government conspiracy is to try to convince us that they serve some kind of purpose.

      • HankHH

        Do you disagree with any of the points below? If so,which one, and why, exactly?
        1. In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward acceleration.
        2. Therefore, free fall acceleration leaves *no* gravitational energy remaining to bend, buckle, snap, or shear structural steel supports.
        3. Even NIST stated that free fall can only take place when their are no structural components below.
        4. Obviously, the structural supports have to be removed *before* free fall can take place.
        5. If gravitational energy was used to bend, snap, buckle, and shear support columns, then free fall acceleration could not take place. The
        massive resistance would have consumed gravitational energy and slowed or stopped the acceleration.

      • Brent Holman

        You are wrong. Period. Also, you are apparently unable to understand the real world. Free-fall has nothing to do with the events of 911, progressive collapse, however, does.

      • HankHH

        Which of the following points do you imagine are wrong, and why, exactly?

        1. In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all*
        of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward
        acceleration.
        2. Therefore, free fall acceleration leaves *no*
        gravitational energy remaining to bend, buckle, snap, or shear
        structural steel supports.
        3. Even NIST stated that free fall can only take place when their are no structural components below.
        4. Obviously, the structural supports have to be removed *before* free fall can take place.
        5.
        If gravitational energy was used to bend, snap, buckle, and shear
        support columns, then free fall acceleration could not take place. The
        massive resistance would have consumed gravitational energy and slowed or stopped the acceleration.

      • Brent Holman

        Alex Jones makes a living spouting whack-o crap. He’s free to do so, because this is America. If he really believes half of what he says he does, then he is defacto insane. Ergo, you believe the ravings of an insane person. As far as elevating him to some pinnacle of truth in media, you are defacto ignorant.

  • ” Isn’t it amazing that everyone knows :

    1) The media doesn’t inform
    2) All wars are fought for money
    3) To follow the money
    4) Money talks
    & 5) Winners write history.

    Yet challenge the veracity of just about any official narrative and the sheep will reflexively dismiss you as a conspiracy theorist .

    A stark example of mass manifest cognitive dissonance “

  • The Sheep love being lied into wars and about wars:

    USS Maine , WW1 (Lusitania) , WW2 (Pearl Harbour – prior knowledge) , Cold War ( Gladio) , Vietnam ( the fake Tonkin incident) , Lavon Affair , Iraq (wmds) , Afghanistan ( 9/11 ) , War on Terror ( FBI-led patsies ) , Libya & Syria ( both attacked covertly by NATO backed “rebels” ie. more lies ).

    So now the herd of mind controlled uninformed programmed sheep salivate over the lie of the Iran threat .

    Why are sheep so dangerously mal-informed ?
    Ans: The dangerously grossly mal-informing MSM .

    Why does the MSM grossly mislead us ?
    Ans: Because thats how our owners , the banking corporate monied establishment ( the same ones who own MSM ) want it .

    Why do they want it like this ?
    Ans: So military piracy and murder can go unexposed !

    Where’s the TV documentary : “The Modern History of lies leading to War” ?

    You think it would be an important relevant story , wouldn’t you ?
    Especially considering the value of history and the concept of “historical context” ?

    But no , the herd of sheep are never presented with the dots let alone the chance to join them !

  • the idiots who knock alex jones cant see the bigger liars the msm !

    • yep start worrying about the real mal-informers !!

      • that’s why we call you programmed cognitive dissonant sheep .

      • Brent Holman

        But Alex Jones is a purveyor of cognitive dissonance, otherwise he’d have to get a REAL job.

  • has the author read about all the false flags in history ? is he aware of the context , in which claims of 9/11 inside job , sit ?

    you see , more and more can clearly see through the haze … and for all aj’s faults he still informs better than the rest of mainstream put together …. and is that which really angers you isn’t it ?

  • Holly Shit!!! Bring out the crazies. Fdfd adaa & derp anticrist why hide behind anonymity? Reveal your true identity you cowards! Half wit high-school drop outs such as yourself, that claim to be the truly informed, are the real “sheeple”. Go ahead and blindly follow these moronic notions of world and goverment conspiracys with no real evidence or proof (citing some dipshits website or a YouTube video is neither evidence nor proof). I truely hope that in a fit of paranoia someone will end your misery.

    • HankHH

      Video evidence isn’t evidence? That doesn’t make any sense. The videos showing WTC7’s free fall and symmetric drop are definitely evidence and proof of WTC7’s free fall and symmetric drop. And those of us who understand the fundamental principles of physics also understand why that (along with vaporized steel and nanothermitic material) is proof of controlled demolition. An object or structure can not fall through thousands of tons of interconnected steel columns at the same rate it will fall through air unless the steel columns are first destroyed.

      • First of all structural systems respond very differently to static and dynamic loads, a wide body airliner with a full fuel load (roughly 23,980 gallons) being flown into a high rise building. The fire would spread verjtically as a result of the burning fuel running down the elevator shafts, utility conduits, and stair wells. Add to that the structural damage of say, American 11 (Boeing 767-200ER, 179,170 kg @ 225 m/s), for example, hitting the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Gee, how damage would that do (It did not come out the other side, so all the KE was absorbed by the building.)? Enough to bring down a building? Lets see: 395,000 pounds = 179,170 kg 500 mph = 805 kph = 225m/s KE = 0.5*M*V^2 KE = 0.5* 179,170 *225^2 KE = 0.5*179,170*50,625 KE = 4.54 * 10^9 J 1 kg of TNT = 4.184 *10^6 J 4.54*10^9 / 4.184 * 10^6 = 1,085 kg of TNT = 2,287 pounds TNT A US Military MK84 bomb (2,000 pound bomb is 46% explosive) = 900 pounds explosive 2 – MK84s Plus 23,980 gallons (90,770 L) of burning jet fuel

      • HankHH

        No planes hit WTC7. Free fall can only take place when there is no resistance, and WTC7’s free fall is a documented fact that is no longer disputed. WTC7 dropped at the same rate it would have fallen through air. This could only happen if the support columns were destroyed by something other than gravity. If gravitational energy was used to bend thousands of tons of steel columns, then there could not have been free fall acceleration. Simple high school physics and basic logic. Free fall acceleration and resistance are mutually exclusive. We can one or the other, but not both.

      • Brent Holman

        Tower 1 hit trade 7, you poor ignorant fool…

      • HankHH

        Why do you refuse to read, think, or get informed? In the government’s final report, issued by NIST in 2008, it is clearly stated that debris impacts from the towers played no role in WTC7’s free fall and symmetric drop. Your claim that Tower one hit WTC7 reveals your comical lack of knowledge and extreme ignorance of the facts and research. The official position has changed many times, as lies always do, but their final report clearly states that ordinary office fires are the only cause of WTC7’s free fall and symmetric drop. And if you understood basic high school physics, you’d also know that this is quite literally physically impossible. We can have free fall, or we can have resistance, but we can not have both. Here on Planet Earth, crushing, bending, and shearing through thousands of tons of cold undamaged steel columns will produce resistance.

      • HankHH

        No planes hit WTC7, and thanks to video evidence and expert independent analysis, WTC7’s free fall, symmetric drop is a documented fact that is no longer controversial or disputed by anyone. In order for an object to accelerate at the rate of free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy must be converted into downward acceleration. That’s why free fall acceleration can only take place in the absence of resistance. If gravitational energy had been used to bend and crush thousands of tons of interconnected steel columns, then free fall could not have taken place. We can have free fall or we can have resistance, but we can’t have both. The only way free fall could have taken place is if the columns were destroyed by a source of energy other than gravity, and they had to be destroyed instantly, totally, and simultaneously before free fall could take place. This is basic high school physics and logic, and exactly why free fall is irrefutable physical proof of controlled demolition. Read up on WTC7’s free fall, and forget about planes and jet fuel.

      • Brent Holman

        The Battalion fire chief described trade 7 as the middle bottom front of the building looked as if it had been scooped out with a giant spoon. The nist report showed the failure of a key support column. Extensive fires were burning all day. Where the heck do you people come up with ‘free fall’? When trade 7 was built it was the fastest construction of a building that size/height EVER in the US. They “threw it into the sky” was the description between ground breaking, and completion. Anyone who looks at a floor plan can figure why it collapsed. The ONLY reason there are questions, is because, simply, no one has photos of the damage caused by Trade 1 hitting it. But plenty of firefighters saw how damaged it was.

      • greatconsumptor

        It’s been 3 years I’m wondering if you’re a convicted murderer yet, or just living in your parents basement still?

      • greatconsumptor

        It’s been 3 years I’m wondering if you’re a convicted murderer yet, or just living in your parents basement still?

      • Yeah, big conspiracy. WTC7 collapsed due to uncontrolled fires and a failed sprinkler system which the fire dept didn’t focus on because they had some larger problem to deal with (I just can’t recall for the life of me what that would have been).

        As the North Tower collapsed on September 11, 2001, heavy debris hit 7 World Trade Center, damaging the south face of the building[30] and starting fires that continued to burn throughout the afternoon.[9] The collapse also caused damage to the southwest corner between Floors 7 and 17 and on the south face between Floor 44 and the roof; other possible structural damage included a large vertical gash near the center of the south face between Floors 24 and 41.[9] The building was equipped with a sprinkler system, but had many single-point vulnerabilities for failure: the sprinkler system required manual initiation of the electrical fire pumps, rather than being a fully automatic system; the floor-level controls had a single connection to the sprinkler water riser; and the sprinkler system required some power for the fire pump to deliver water. Also, water pressure was low, with little or no water to feed sprinklers.[31][32]

        After the North Tower collapsed, some firefighters entered 7 World Trade Center to search the building. They attempted to extinguish small pockets of fire, but low water pressure hindered their efforts.[33] Over the course of the day fires burned out of control on several floors of 7 World Trade Center, the flames visible on the east side of the building.[34][35] During the afternoon, fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30.[30] In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon.[36]At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.[37] During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.[38] Around 3:30 pm FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro decided to halt rescue operations, surface removal, and searches along the surface of the debris near 7 World Trade Center and evacuate the area due to concerns for the safety of personnel.[39] At 5:20:33 pm EDT the building started to collapse, with the crumble of the east mechanical penthouse, and at 5:21:10 pm EDT it collapsed completely.[2][40] There were nocasualties associated with the collapse.

      • Brent Holman

        ALL of the ‘evidence’ claiming controlled demolition has been thoroughly debunked. A simple understanding of the construction methods used in the twin towers suggests that no way were they going to remain standing. Too much damage, too much fire, presto; they collapsed.

      • HankHH

        “Presto; they collapsed”. Wow, that’s a very detailed, technical, and well researched analysis. You had help with that, didn’t you? The massive steel frames of the towers were not damaged below the impact zone, and that’s where the steel frames were thickest and strongest.
        Look at some of the video presentations at 911speakoutdotorg and hopefully get informed. Your posts show us that you have yet to do any research on the WTC7 demolitions. You’re quite simply spewing faith based nonsense.

    • So i take it you know all about the false flags of the last 120 years yes ?

  • Scott

    It is sad that someone with a degree in political science does not know the difference between a noun and an adjective. How do you expect us to take you seriously if you are writing published articles and you lack in the ability to distinguish between a noun and an adjective?

  • Georg Hartlmaier

    Agree go to his site and leave him a nice message, but why stop there? Check out a site called “Obama makes me puke” if you want to see a site that embodies the true racist, hateful, and flat out stupid ass people on the far right. Needless to say I have been blocked, Join Me!

  • Mary

    I am not a conspiracy freak, and I have zero respect for Alex Jones. There is one conspiracy that I do believe in however, and that would be 911. Watching the events unfold that day on a 75 inch tv in a sports bar I managed and watching the buildings come down I stated out loud to all in the room that day ” Looks like a controlled demolition to me”. I even saw the telltale little puffs underneath which are part of a controlled demolition. Buildings do not come down like that on their own footprint and there is a film on the internet Architects & Engineers for 911 truth, every American citizen needs to watch this. Also why do they never mention building 7, another skyscraper that came down that day yet most Americans do not know about it. And the patriot act has taken away so many of our rights to the benefit of the government. And no investigation was done and they shipped all the debris from the buildings to China, which is NOT how we investigate crimes here. LIES, LIES, LIES told by Bush & Cheney and there co-conspirators.

    • waynef43

      Where did you get your degree in structural engineering?

      • HankHH

        WTC7’s free fall and symmetric drop is proof of demolition even without the molten metal and nanothermitic material. One doesn’t need a degree in structural engineering to understand high school physics or process simple logic. Your car won’t coast down a steep hill at the same rate on the open road as it will through along row of parked cars. Bending steel consumes a lot of energy.

      • waynef43

        “One doesn’t need a degree in structural engineering…”
        Yes you do.

      • Brent Holman

        breaking connecting joints, not bending steel.

      • HankHH

        So, you actually “think” that no steel columns were bent when WTC7’s massive earthquake, hurricane, and fire resistant steel frame crushed itself, eh? That’s a least as silly as your other nonsensical fantasies…

      • Brent Holman

        Listen pal, I didn’t spend about 500+ hours studying every single thing I could find about 911 for nothing.
        Controlled demolition supposes a motive for destroying the emergency operations center for new york city, which on the face of it, is retarded. A handful of photos or video of the damage to trade7 would have quashed YOU’RE nonsensical fantasies before they even got started. People like YOU do not, apparently, know how to think, to do research, to be UNBIASED & OBJECTIVE in analysis of events, with a dash of actual human behaviour thrown in. You do, however, obviously, know how to be a PARROT.

      • HankHH

        But, you still “think” that no steel columns were bent when WTC7’s massive, hurricane, earthquake, and fire resistant steel frame suddenly crushed itself. That’s pretty silly.
        And of course, you still do not understand the simple concept of free fall acceleration. Free fall can only take place in the absence of resistance, and even you should be able to understand that bending, shearing, breaking ,and crushing through thousands of tons of cold undamaged steel columns would produce a *lot* of resistance – certainly more than falling through air. Either your mind is incapable of rational thought, or you’re a troll.

      • HankHH

        The 1600 architects and engineers at ae911truth dot org can explain to you why your question is irrelevant and nonsensical, as well as why free fall, vaporized steel, and thermitic material are irrefutable physical proof of controlled demolition.

    • Der Antichrist

      You are right, now its the “lefts” turn!

  • Well, Jones is correct about poison in our drinking water — fluoride. Look it up, since I can’t post links here.

  • HankHH

    Alex Jones is right about 9-11 being an inside job. WTC7’s free fall and symmetric drop combined with the molten and vaporized steel proves demolition, which also demolishes the government’s entire 9-11 conspiracy myth. This is very simple physics and logic.

    • Because there was no aluminum or any other kind of metal that could have become molten….

      • HankHH

        The steel columns were not made of aluminum, and some were vaporized by the nano-thermitic that was discovered in steel and dust samples by a team of nine international scientists. Read up the mysterious eutectic steel from WTC7.

      • HankHH

        The steel columns were not made of aluminum, and some of them were vaporized by the highly refined nano-thermitic material that was discovered in steel and dust samples by a team of nine international scientists. Read up on the eutectic steel from WTC7.

  • If this is about his suggestion that the Boston bombing was a false flag
    operation, let’s get to the bottom of it: rewind the video tape from the
    feed at the finish line, and we can see who planted the bomb…it’s not
    that difficult.

  • Best to ignore him, but observe his actions carefully

  • Don’t forget, Alex went on Piers Morgan’s CNN show and threatened to kill Piers right to his face. It’s a wonder that CNN security didn’t call either the police (911) or the guys in the white coats. I watched the interview live and after 5 minutes, Alex’s behavior almost drove me nuts, so I grabbed the remote changed the channel.

  • Liono

    Alex Jones is manipulating both his listeners as well as his detractors. Alex Jones and articles like these do a great job of dividing people only searching for the truth…

  • Caleb Ball

    What a horribly written article. You spend more time writing about how much you hate the man than you do explaining why. It’s like Piers Morgan doing an interview. There’s no depth to it. Thank you for wasting my time, Mr. Clifton.

  • The sun rising in the moring is a government conspiracy to this guy.

  • mleanos

    It’s not very progressive to bash someone with such nasty use of language.

  • mleanos

    I think it’s funny that you won’t link to his website, but you will link to his facebook. Why wouldn’t you want your readers to educate themselves on the subject that your speaking on? Are you afraid that your readers will think for themselves, and come to their own conclusions? Or should they just take your word for it?

  • mleanos

    Although, Alex Jones’ views are controversial (which is not a bad thing), he asks very good questions. Questions that should be asked. Would you rather have everyone walking around accepting what the media, and government tells us to be the complete truth?

    I may not agree with all of his ideas, and views, but I admire him for his bravery to seek the truth in a world that is filled with deceit and corruption. This man is extreme and more outwardly emotional than I am, but he is an honest man; this is why I respect him.

    I don’t respect the way in which you wrote this article. Maybe you should do some fact checking, and not make such broad general statements on a man’s character or his views. Alex cites all his information, and then provides his opinion on that subject matter. May it be extreme, or not, it is still his opinion and he gives rational and factual evidence to support his view. I don’t want to get into the misinformation you have in this article, here in this post. I’ll save that for a separate comment.

    • Brent Holman

      Opinions are like farts, everyone has them, & people are primarily concerned with their own.

  • mleanos

    Okay Allen Clifton…

    First of all, Alex has not perpetrated any of these so-called conspiracy theories. He has posed very important questions, and it happens to be that the conclusions that he draws from his research are in agreement by many people. Obviously, not by you. I’m guessing you haven’t done much fact checking on what Alex believes, or the ideas he presents.

    By the sound of it, you are claiming to know the “truth” on all the subject matters that you stated in your article. How much research have you actually done on all these theories? Either you truly believe that you know the complete truth on all these subjects, or you choose to blindly attack someone else and their views because differ from your own.

  • jusme

    ? I will make just one comment and it will be to this person that has the moniker Der Antichrist.

    You seem to believe you are intelligent but I must ask, “did you neglect attending your English classes? Do understand there is a difference between the usage of (your) and (you’re)? I suggest you return to class and learn something before you try to convey to the world you are intelligent. You idiot.

    • Brent Holman

      No one really gives a crap about exact, correct grammer & usage, unless you are seriously anal-retentive. THIS IS NOT ENGLISH CLASS.

      We know what is meant, but proper english is not the same as proper rules of LOGIC & Reason…

  • I can only ask one thing and that is please do not look up any of this information and this is why …I want any one that agree’s with this article to learn of it’s truth the hard way…when your staring down the barrow of a gun…it called the element of surprise and sadly your cooperation and stupidity amazes me…

  • Actually, I am one of those who believes a lot of what Alex Jones has to say. I believe 9/11 was an inside job and I believe the Boston Marathon bombing was also an inside job.

    If you want to ignore 1500 engineers and demolition experts that say the WTC buildings fell in a controlled manner, and that bldg 7 should never have fallen you are blind by choice. Ignore firemen saying there were explosions beneath them and below the lobby level.

    9/11 lies got us into an illegal war and the marathon bombing is another way to set the stage for marshal law.

  • TomMullen

    “If he vanished into a sinkhole into the lowest depths of the bowels of this planet, I wouldn’t feel the least bit sad.” Good heavens, he’s not THAT bad. 😀

  • Alex jones is on point. Youppl don’t want to evem think about the stuff that he has facts to back up cuz it brings fear to you and you use humor and ridicule him to confort yourselves subconciously. It’s ok. It a messed up world. Have an open mind or be a sheep and live a lie. This author is a scared fuck tard living in a falsified illusion that our government is on our side and wants to ridicule a man for.seeking.truth and asking the hard questions. Hes more of an american than you could eveR WISH TO BE. Your article is overly exagerated opinionated bullshit. Get rid of the pasfier itll beok.

  • Lots of expletives and personal attacks, yet you cannot, or will not substantiate one of your claims. Jones at least puts links to corroborate his statements…I watched the ENTIRE family guy episode on Hulu, before they REMOVED IT…There.most assuredly WAS a scene depicting carnage at the finish line of the Marathon, and, yes, there was a scene where Peter uses a cell phone and bombs detonate…FACT. .Fluoride IS put in our drinking water, and it is a deadly poison…FACT. A NWO has been called for and announced openly by Presidents, Kissinger, Rothchilds, Soros, ect….FACT One of the main side effects of antidepressants IS SUICIDE….FACT. Building 7 did not knock itself down in 6.9 seconds….FACT There are so many inconsistencies and flat out government lies about both shooting incidents one could fly a Galaxy class starship through them…..FACT. Good journalism requires facts, not name calling…this is not pre-school…grow up.

  • Since you claim he’s wrong, prove him wrong.

  • ok. this guy is a complete ass monkey. but this article sounds familiar word for word except you replace the boston marathon with newton. or am i as insane as this guy?

  • Stop using “You see,…”. It was horrible when Paul Ryan used “You see” before most of his sentences and it still is. It just sounds (and reads) stupidly.

  • Guys logic matters or at least it should. Five years ago Jones went ape over the FEMA camps we were all going to be put in. Yet to this day he has yet to show up at one with a tv crew or thousands of his ummm fans to prove they are there. And really is even a quarter of what he claims is true don’t you think he would have either had a accident or died peacefully in his sleep by now? ( Unless he’s part of it and the crazy is to distract us from the NWO. LOL )

  • He out crazied Glenn Beck! I didn’t think that was possible, but I was proved wrong.

  • Jarrett Wesley

    his website is also dishonest..very one sided. if you try to post a comment on an article and it’s not along the same lines of what all his little butt buddies are hootin’ and hollerin’ about, the moderator just deletes them. obviously because it reveals the fact that they’re unintelligent and cannot think for themselves

  • Calling Alex Jones a Libertarian is an Insult to Libertarians…. sorry he is not one.

  • faxchex

    why are you wasting time and energy trying to reason with a lunatic, or someone who obviously chooses to connect dots where there are no dots. you can’t get through. put your energy to better use.

  • Allen Clifton! Dont hold back! Tell us how you really feel! lol Totally agreed!

  • anon

    Alex Jones is the man. I feel sorry for the author of this article

  • memeremalek

    Isn’t it curious how all the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones pinheads never show pics of themselves or use their real names … ooooo….sounds conspiratorial to me. Hiding behind your own false flags? It’s easy to rant from lala-land & make wild paranoic accusations without using your True identities. Numbskulls who follow cults are a real threat to humanity’s sanity because they probably breed from the double-wide park. Come out from behind your trick or treat costumes. You ignorant slobs belong in straight jackets.

  • OMG

    Forward thinking? You just spoke like you have a masters degree in hate and ignorance.
    seriously, i dont even like the guy, but the utter lack of any form of decency in what is supposed to be a page for information is beyond disgusting.
    To whoever wrote this.
    You are beyond shameful, and i pray i never have the displeasure of wasting my time meeting you, for i fear the lack of actual thought behind your opinions would decrease my own intelligence.

  • The author basically wished death on Alex Jones, classy fella, isn’t he. Typical of the idealogical left, to incite and to wish death on anyone who makes your little vagina’s hurt. Pathetic!

  • Grand1

    Never heard of him…until now. Gee, thanks.

  • When everyone stops taking the bait and reacting to his outrageous comments he will no longer be relevant and will fade away.

  • Truth Seeker

    You’re all idiots! You’d all believe the moon was made of cheese if the main stream media told you it was.
    It’s funny, you all call him crazy but then when he has official government documents to back it up you all refuse to look at them. I’ve met your kind, you have your identity so wrapped up in the lies that the main stream media is selling that you refuse to believe anything else because your so afraid of your current reality going away! Allen Clifton has a degree? In what, child care surely not political science?
    You ain’t foolin me with this progressive BS.
    The funniest comment is “he believes there’s a NEW WROLD ORDER”…. and you don’t? Are you blind? You must think everyone elese is. You’re a fool!

  • Alex Johns is a conspiracy leader evolved from the ranks of the tabloids. Fun to read, but those who really believe this stuff will go to their grave happy, knowing Alex as the “expert authority” on the “real story” . No changing the minds of those who need to be told what to believe. Rush Limbald would understand the gimic Alex plays for self serving attention. You embarrass yourself if you fall into this net!!

  • I felt the same way that you did a couple of years ago. However, while I do think he sensationalizes many issues, I have done my own thorough independent research and he is correct on several issues. Do your homework before you form your opinion.