Enough with the Ebola Hysteria: A Few Facts About the Virus that Fox News Doesn’t Want Americans to Believe

elisabeth-hasselbeck-ebolaI guess it never really occurred to me until it finally happened, what a gold mine Ebola was going to be for our media if it ever came to the United States. And while most of our media outlets have done their best to seize on fear of Ebola, nobody has done it better than Fox News.


But they haven’t just tried to hype up fear about Ebola, they’ve practically been trying to fabricating fear.

Like when Elisabeth Hasselbeck sat down with an infectious disease specialist and seemed “shocked” that this expert wasn’t more alarmed about the news that Ebola had made it to the United States. During the segment you could see Hasselbeck doing just about everything possible to get this specialist to say anything that would feed into the fear-mongering Ebola frenzy she was trying to push. But this expert was having none of it.

Or when Fox News tried to evoke conservative distrust in President Obama as a reason why Americans might not want to trust the scientific facts being presented by the CDC about the disease. You know, because the CDC is part of the government and Americans should never trust the government.

Those are just two examples of the many I’ve seen on Fox News over the last two weeks where several of the network’s personalities have seemingly gone out of their way to create as much panic about this disease as possible. Despite the fact that the only person who’s gotten Ebola has been a nurse who most likely didn’t follow correct protocols while dealing with the recently deceased Thomas Duncan.

And I can promise you, this nurse being diagnosed with Ebola will be heavily hyped on Fox News during the next few days. Because this obviously means that the CDC is lying about how difficult it is for this disease to spread. Even though not a single person Mr. Duncan came into contact with prior to being quarantined has shown any signs of having Ebola. But you probably won’t hear that said on Fox News very often, if at all.


So I thought I’d list a few facts to try to do my best to calm some of this irrational Ebola hysteria:

  • Ebola is only spread through direct contact with infected bodily fluids when an individual is showing symptoms of having the disease.
  • It is not an airborne virus.
  • Real life is not like the movies. Ebola is not going to spontaneously mutate into an airborne virus leading to a rogue Army disease specialist flying around the country trying to track down the original host to make antibodies to cure the new, much deadlier strain. If you weren’t aware, that’s the plot from the movie Outbreak. 
  • Around 4,000 people have died from Ebola. To put that into perspective, 20,000 Americans (and hundreds of thousands of people worldwide) die of the flu every single year. And the flu is much easier to spread that Ebola.
  • Ebola can be killed with simple soap and hot water, bleach or detergent.
  • Nigeria managed to contain the spread of the disease after it was first introduced – Nigeria. 

And, again, outside of a nurse who most likely didn’t follow strict protocols when dealing with the late Mr. Duncan, not a single person he was in contact with has shown any signs of having the virus and we’re nearly past the 21 day window where signs of Ebola can still show up.

While I understand that many people are concerned about this disease, I still think it’s important that we remember to trust the scientific experts who are unanimously telling American that there’s essentially a zero percent chance of the United States dealing with a widespread outbreak of the Ebola virus.

And after nearly 2 1/2 weeks since Thomas Duncan was quarantined, with only one nurse who probably wasn’t following proper protocols when dealing with him falling ill to the virus, I think it’s safe to say that we should trust the experts. Even if our media, and especially Fox News, has done just about everything they possibly can to convince us that we shouldn’t.



Allen Clifton

Allen Clifton is a native Texan who now lives in the Austin area. He has a degree in Political Science from Sam Houston State University. Allen is a co-founder of Forward Progressives and creator of the popular Right Off A Cliff column and Facebook page. Be sure to follow Allen on Twitter and Facebook, and subscribe to his channel on YouTube as well.

Comments

Facebook comments

  • Jim Bean

    Fox News has provided as much or more information about just how difficult it is for this virus to spread as any other network. To suggest other wise is to, ironically, disseminate misinformation. The fact that they have open debate on issues where conflicting view points get discussed is something conservatives actually enjoy.

    • Ted Govostis

      You don’t debate the relative merits of ice cream for breakfast with your kids. Why? Because you know there is no factual argument they can put forth as to why ice cream is the right choice. Yet fox news keeps putting forward commentators who have the same, relatively speaking, amount of knowledge as a five year old’s view on the ice cream for breakfast debate. It’s a waste of time and the only ones they will convince are other five year olds.

      Not all topics should be debated.

      • Jim Bean

        Fox puts plenty of qualified authorities (PhD’s, etc) to inform the viewers about the particulars of Ebola. They also have plenty of discussion by laymen on the topic. Its amazing how liberals who wouldn’t dream of watching the channel regard themselves as the foremost authorities on what’s going on there. Wisdom via heavily biased speculation, I suppose.

      • Melania Gulley

        Actually some us watch it and realize just how much venom and stupidity they throw around . i watch lots of channels. Guess what Fox is the least accurate

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        to quote ” saint Reagan”
        “………….there U go again…………..”
        —————,,,,, annoying a regressive with facts

      • They also attempt to manipulate whatever experts that DO agree to appear on their camera into stating their own claims and misinformation. Then when they are provided with facts, they melt down.

        Seriously, Jim, do you think Fox has been proven to be liars and idiots by accident?

      • Jim Bean

        I think Fox is as honest as the day is long compared to Obama and when I see an Obama disciple critiquing Fox’s credibility, I see a hypocrite.

      • Di Kelley

        Fox news has been spreading misinformation about well. .everything. . .for years. Of course this is speaking as someone who doesn’t trust any news source completely and takes everything said with a grain of salt.

      • Steve Brains

        I wonder if Fact Check is archived to the Dubya days.

        THAT’s right. No one NEEEDED a fact checker UNTIL the Bush days.

      • Thank you. From a guy like you, that, kind sir, is a compliment of the highest order. I shall and will continue, to wear that badge proudly.

        Thank you.

      • Steve Brains

        Amen Sister! Pray out loud Sister!

      • “Amen Mr. Sister! Pray out loud Mr. Sister!” FIFY.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        jimbo has claimed -to me- that jimbo does NOT believe that anyone ( see: CHRIST) who has walked upon this planet is ”god”
        =================================
        Im pretty certain jimbo is retired and enjoys his quotidian assimilation(s) of grain alcohol. He also finds easy to corroborate socio-economic facts anathemal ( to him)
        you; on the other hand— are generally fabulous when U write!
        Ever crossed paths with neo-regressive IVAN the RENKO on these blogs? HE is priceless

      • It doesn’t matter a hill of beans what anyone believes, never mind what Jimbo believes.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        your inadvertent parisology is on FULL display with that otiose post
        ======================================

      • mosquito

        You’re hopelessly self-deluded. I am in complete control of my game here. Any competent logician can confirm this fact. Give it up. You’ve lost this debate a long time ago, you intellectual pygmy. You’ve got nothing. This is a fact demonstrated by your moronic posts. Your just spewing forth mental diarrhea.

      • BB-Mystic

        Oooh! Now it’s stinky- boring!

        *flagged for being a self-deluded smelly logic-troll*

      • mosquito

        As is always the case with your posts, with not one single exception, you’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls them fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • And I’m still wiping your inflamed ass off the floor.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your assertions.

      • Gary Smith

        If you “think” that, then it shows just how pervasive the Fox brand of propaganda is.

      • Jonathan Reese

        I think “Jim Bean” should lay off the Jim Beam.

      • Jim Bean

        If I had a dollar . . . . . . . .

      • Steve Brains

        YOu wouldn’t be on your knees in the men’s room…
        looking for quarters. Was that an airplane I hear in the backround Jim?

      • Di Kelley

        Steve, are you capable of *not* being a troll?

      • Steve Brains

        I have no desire to NOT be a ‘troll’.

      • Steve Brains

        Obama has a Network? I thought OWN was Oprah?

      • Steve Brains

        They have a Judge, a jury… plenty of persecutors. SOme of them honest to good rooFuc*ers.

        All they need is a criminal but they have YET to find one.

      • Steve Brains

        Bill Cosby— Chocolate Cake Is Good For You.

      • Ted Govostis

        Yeah, I avoided saying cake, thinking of that skit 😉

      • A five year old’s view on the ice cream for breakfast debate is an amount of knowledge? That’s funny. I thought that it was a view.

        You say, “It’s a waste of time…”. Yet, there is no antecedent, whatsoever, for your “It”.

        You said “your kids”. And then you said “other five year olds”. My kids are not five year olds, so “other five year olds” is moronic.

      • Ted Govostis

        Odd other people had no problem understanding what was meant. View in this case is used in the meaning of perspective, which is based on an amount of knowledge. Not all views are equal as some people’s view providers a clearer picture about the situation, due to more knowledge. But you already knew that.

        And clearly I was speaking hypothetically regarding “your kids” and “other 5 year olds”. But nice try at sounding smart.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        hes the latest rage!!! a pedantic yet ill-informed troll mollusk appearing here to attempt to annoy!!
        ======================================
        let us continue 2 give him a well deserved warm welcome!!

      • Ted Govostis

        The sad point is that he is wrong while being pedantic. Classic case of chess with a pigeon.

      • mosquito

        You are big on making bald, unsubstantiated assertions. Since you do this, you are obviously not intelligent enough to know that doing this is a complete waste of time for everyone reading these assertions, including yourself. All such assertions are illegitimate and ruled out of any intelligent conversation. Why is that? Because, if we allow people to make such assertions, then anyone can say anything, which inevitably makes for moronic conversations.

        Hence, you have contributed absolutely nothing to this thread with your last post above.

      • Ted Govostis

        What bald, unsubstantiated assertions did I make?

      • Every assertion you made is a bald, unsubstantiated assertion. You did not make even a feeble attempt to substantiate any of these assertions. Hence, they are all bald, unsubstantiated assertions.

      • Ted Govostis

        Examples, with refutations?

      • Take any one of your assertions. You did not even try to substantiate any of them. Hence, they are, by definition, bald, unsubstantiated assertions. I don’t need to refute any of your bald, unsubstantiated assertions. On the contrary, you are required to substantiate them. After all, all such assertions are ruled out of an intelligent conversation by one of the most basic rules of logic. You’re very confused.

      • Ted Govostis

        IE, you know the moment you actually have to defend your point about my “assertions” you’ll fall flat on your face so why bother, OK we hear you loud and clear Capt. Clueless.

      • You’re hopelessly self-deluded. You’ve deceived yourself into believing that you have vanquished me in this debate. Nothing could be further from the truth. You’ve scored zero points since all your assertions have been discarded from the debate, since you never substantiated them. I, on the other hand, have scored several points, proving all my assertions. You haven’t got a clue as to what it takes to construct a valid argument.

      • There is nothing pedantic about what I have written. All my proofs have been very brief and concise. There is absolutely nothing pedantic about any of them. I would be pendantic if I was trying to teach someone by my proofs. I’m not doing that. I’m simply refuting the nonsense coming forth from the people with whom I am engaging in this thread.

      • Ted Govostis

        You are being pedantic because you keep trying to “educate” about how logic supposedly works, without actually addressing the merits of our positions. So yes, you are being the text book definition of pedantic.

        pedantry
        ˈpɛd(ə)ntri/
        noun
        excessive concern with minor details and rules.

      • You’re contradicting yourself. Your definition of pedantry does not say that it is about educating. It says that it is about excessive concern with minor details and rules. There is nothing excessive about my concern with logic. I have merely pointed out that a number of people in this thread are violating basic principles of logic. That is not being excessive.

      • Ted Govostis

        Excessive concern over minor details and rules. You keep failing to address the substance of the arguments put forth, instead focusing on how they don’t meet your belief of construction of an argument.

      • You’re apparently abysmally ignorant of logic. What I have been insisting upon is not my belief of how to construct an argument. What I have been talking about is logic as it has been practiced for centuries.

      • I have never been pedantic in this thread. All of my proofs have been very brief and concise. If I were trying to teach someone by my proofs, then I might be pedantic. But, I’m not trying to do that. I am merely refuting the nonsense that the people with whom I am dealing in this thread have written.

        Again, you believe in word magic. I know that that is pathetic, but that is clearly what you believe.

      • mosquito

        As is always the case with your posts, you’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • You’re a pathetic childish twerp. Hang it up. You’re saying nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        Your first sentence is a straw man. I had no trouble understanding what was meant. I wasn’t evaluating what you meant to say. I was evaluating what you said. That’s precisely what an English teacher does in grading an essay. She doesn’t ask herself what did the student mean to say. She asks herself what did the student say and is it sound.

        It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether view is based on based on an amount of knowledge. We are not talking about whether view is based on an amount of knowledge. We are talking about whether view is an amount of knowledge, which it is not. So, this argument is a straw man, one of the most basic logical fallacies. I suggest that you give up trying to make a logical argument. You’re clearly not up to doing that sort of thing.

        It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether you were speaking hypothetically regarding “your kids” and “other 5 year olds”. I proved that you speech about these two subjects is nonsense. Any competent logician can confirm that my argument is a proof. This is not surprising since I have a thirty year career writing proofs for some of the best academic journals in the world.

      • BB-Mystic

        Who gave you permission to evaluate what anyone says?

        *flagged for being a boring arrogant logic-troll*

      • mosquito

        Anyone has a right to correct other people. No one has a right to do whatever they want to do without the criticism of others.

      • I have every right to evaluate what anyone says. Who gave you the right to question my right to do that?

      • You’ve got a lot of gall, BB-Mystic. That is exactly what people have been doing on this blog, evaluating what certain other people have said. I don’t remember you questioning their right to do that. According to you, all of you were just having a nice conversation.

      • Ted Govostis

        You keep telling yourself that.

      • mosquito

        If you are either unable or unwilling to concede the validity of my argument, it is not due to any failure of my argument. On the contrary, it has something to do with the failure of your intellect. My argument is a proof as any competent logician can confirm.

      • Ted Govostis

        No, it is not. You fail to acknowledge simple facts. Such as the fact that one’s perspective is representative and reflective of one’s amount of knowledge. Notice the English language includes phrases such as a “narrow view” or “broad perspective” for just 2 examples. Both of those adjectives describe relative size. Ergo view/perspective can (and in this case were clearly meant to) be spoken about in term of relative amounts. Your posts are text book examples of spurious reasoning.

      • This post is a straw man. It is irrelevant to the issue at hand. The fact that you think that it is relevant demonstrates what a moron you are. There is nothing spurious about my reasoning. Any competent logician will confirm that my arguments are irrefutable proofs. You’re full of crap. Again, you believe in word magic. You’re just making assertions with no proof and you believe that that accomplishes something. That’s insanity, no doubt about it.

      • Ted Govostis

        No, simply no. No straw man involved. Please in your infinite wisdom explain why despite the fact that you can apply descriptors of size and scope to a person’s view they do not in fact, reflect an inference about the amount of one’s knowledge.

      • You obviously do not know what is a straw man. You point out that a view reflects an amount of knowledge. That is a straw man, pure and simple. Why? Because, we were not talking about whether something reflected an amount of knowledge. We were talking about whether something was an amount of knowledge. So, talking about whether something reflects an amount of knowledge is a red herring, or a straw man.

      • Ted Govostis

        No, only you were debating whether something *is* an amount of knowledge as opposed to representative of an amount. You’re the only one throwing up strawmen, by deliberately misinterpreting what is said.

      • No, we were definitely debating about whether something is an amount of knowledge, not whether something is based on an amount of knowledge. You wrote: “Yet fox news keeps putting forward commentators who have the same, relatively speaking, amount of knowledge as a five year old’s view on the ice cream for breakfast debate.” It is clear here that you were speaking of a five year old’s view on the ice cream for breakfast debate “as” an amount of knowledge. If you only meant to refer to the amount of knowledge in this view, then you would have to have said something equivalent to “as in a five year old’s view …” or “as contained in a five year old’s view …” or “as a five year old’s view on the ice cream for breakfast debate has”. You said none of these things, or anything equivalent to them, so your explanation is sheer slimy backpeddling.

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious. The fact that something is reflective of an amount of knowledge does not make it an amount of knowledge. You are the one who is failing to acknowledge simple facts, facts which I have previously pointed out in an irrefutable manner. There is nothing spurious about my reasoning. It is cold, hard logic; logic which you will never refute, no matter how many bald, unsubstantiated assertions you moronically assert.

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded. You believe in word magic. You believe
        that by saying “You keep telling yourself that.” you magically vanquish
        me without doing anything at all. That makes you to be certifiably
        insane. You believe that you can get something from nothing. That is definitely a sign of insanity.

      • Ted Govostis

        It’s called not lending credibility to a fallacious argument. Or in common parlance you are full of shit.

      • As I said, you believe in word magic. Since bald, unsubstantiated assertions are excluded from an intelligent conversation, your assertions are excluded from this conversation. Hence, you have yet to contribute anything to this conversation.

      • You’re quite a moron. Being “based on an amount of knowledge” does not make it an amount of knowledge, moron.

        It is totally irrelevant whether you were speaking hypothetically. The fact that you think that that is relevant reveals that you are a moron. Your juxtaposition of the two phrases “your kids” and “other 5 year olds” remains moronic, moron.

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. You believe in word magic. You believe that by saying “But nice try at sounding smart.” you magically vanquish me without doing anything at all. That makes you to be certifiably insane.

      • Ted Govostis

        Sure thing sport. The fact that something is hypothetical/rhetorical is completely irrelevant to the fact that you tried to base your entire attack on taking them literally. And I bet the fact that you had to resort to ad hominem attacks is also irrelevant. Yet I’m the one who’s arguments are lacking basis. OK then. Time for you to go back to logic 101.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

        As I said, you believe in word magic. That is abundantly clear from all your posts.

        You
        obviously don’t know what is the ad hominem fallacy. As my son would
        say, the ad hominem fallacy is not saying that your opponent is a jerk.
        The ad hominem fallacy is saying that your opponent is a jerk and,
        therefore, his argument is false. The former is either an observation or
        a fallacious statement. The latter is a logical fallacy. More
        specifically, it is a nonsequitur; its premise does not imply its
        conclusion. Hence, it is clear that I have nowhere in this thread been
        involved in committing the ad hominem fallacy.

        You write: “Yet I’m
        the one who’s arguments are lacking basis.” This means “Yet I’m the one
        who is arguments are lacking basis.” What the hell does that mean?

        I have no need of going back to logic 101. You believe in word magic. You are the one who needs to see a professional.

        I
        am an expert at logic, with thirty years of experience writing original
        proofs of original mathematical theorems for some of the best
        mathematical journals in the world.

      • This is another one of your straw men. Whether or not view is based on an amount of knowledge is irrelevant to our discussion. The issue at hand is whether or not view is an amount of knowledge, not whether or not it is based on an amount of knowledge.

        The fact that you were speaking hypothetically is irrelevant. The point remains that the juxtaposition of “your kids” and “other 5 year olds” is moronic.

        I am not trying to sound smart. I am rendering an irrefutable refutation of your crap.

      • Ted Govostis

        No, you are wrong. A view can be spoken about in terms of the amount of knowledge it represents, which is what I was doing. Your intentional misinterpretation of what I was saying is a hole in your argument, not mine.

      • This is a straw man, as I previously explained. We were not talking about whether something represents an amount of knowledge. We were talking about whether something was an amount of knowledge. You can deny that till the cows come home, it won’t change that fact.

      • mosquito

        A five year old’s view on the ice cream for breakfast debate is not an amount of knowledge. So, your fourth sentence is gibberish. Also, by kids are not five year olds. So, your two phrases, “your kids” and “other five year olds” are moronically placed in your post.

      • Ted Govostis

        See reply above. Logic fail. Thank you for playing.

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded. Any competent logician will confirm that all of my arguments are proofs.

        You believe in word magic. You believe that by just making an assertion, you’ve established something. That makes you to be a moron.

      • Ted Govostis

        Yet another ad hominem attack. I see you’ve run out of anything of value to say.

      • I’ve already proven that you’re confused about what is the ad hominem fallacy. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic.

      • Ted Govostis

        Dude, do you ever tire of embarrassing yourself?

      • You’re hopelessly self-deluded. I have not embarassed myself in the least in my response to you in this thread. My arguments have been eminently logical. You could not refute a single one of them, no matter how many bald, unsubstantiated assertions you make.

    • BB-Mystic

      Yes, except there is no “debate” on the facts regarding Ebola.

      Either it is an airborne virus or it isn’t.

      Either it spreads via blood, tears, sweat, and semen or it doesn’t.

      The Ebola virus, just like climate change, is not something that should be up for “discussion” as a “conflicting view point.”

      • Jim Bean

        You don’t think we should be discussing how to best prevent the spread of it? Because that’s what the discussion is about.

      • Di Kelley

        The best way to prevent the spread is proper sanitation. If you handle an ebola patient in any way, shape or form, wash you hands immediately after doing so, don’t touch any portion of your face until you have done so. Proper sanitation goes a *long long* way toward preventing the spread of it, considering that simply soap and water or bleach and water kills it.

      • strayaway

        Isolating the virus and anyone coming in contact with it is the best way to prevent its spread. Sanitation is extremely important as you say but its best not to come in contact with the virus in the first place. Also, considering the consequence is death, this is in a different league than the flu. Thus, even sanitation has to be greatly exaggerated like taking busses and ambulances out of service and de-toxed if possible.We can’t be satisfied with going “a long way” with this. We have to go all the way. There is hope. Nigeria had 7 ebola deaths but seems to have gotten on top of ebola with no new cases. I’m surprised that one nurse did get infected given all the precautions she must have been taking. I read something of her boyfriend now being checked because of stomach problems too.

      • Di Kelley

        Again, even the detoxing would consist of little more than cleaning out the room’s surfaces and the inside of the vehicle in which a patient was traveling with either soap and water or bleach and water. Yes, preventing the exposure in the first place is the best method, but once there has been an exposure the sanitation will prevent a spread outside of the initial exposure, and with said sanitation, exposure does not have to mean and will likely *not* mean an infection.

        Edited to add: Some flu strains *can* be a death sentence, and ebola if properly treated and contained does not necessarily *mean* a death sentence.

      • Steve Brains

        I’d vote bleach, and like a good Scotch, I’d use it STRAIGHT!

      • strayaway

        My grandmother recalled that during the 1918 flu, her streetcar would go passed a cemetery where caskets were stacked because they couldn’t bury them fast enough. The flu can kill and can also morph into more deadly strains.

        However, the mortality rate in Africa has now been revised upward to 70%, way higher than any flu. It is lower here because we had $520,000 to spend on Mr. Duncan for instance. It ebola breaks out in the US, the quality of care will go down though and other health care will suffer. The emergency ward was shut down at the Dallas hospital, for instance, so some emergency patients will have to go further for treatment. Also, these costs come from our existing health care programs so there won’t be quite as much in the coffers to treat Americans. particularly poor Americans, for ebola or anything else. Mr. Duncan, so far, has given two Americans ebola. My guess is that they were pretty careful with sanitation but this virus is so infectious when a patient is dying that CDC protocols were insufficient. I am reminded of when Katrina was a level 5 hurricane bearing down on New Orleans and FEMA put all those people in the Superdome which was rated level 3.

      • Di Kelley

        Again, though, virus can be killed by soap and water or bleach and water. Unlike said flu it isn’t *airborne.* and even at the moment of death it isn’t as contagious as you’re trying to make it out to be as long as a person *washes up and washes up the room after.* What makes the flu *so* dangerous isn’t how deadly it is, but the fact that it is extraordinarily difficult to contain.

      • strayaway

        So far, the Dallas hospital, with all the help and focused attention of the CDC failed: one dead and two new cases. Guess they didn’t use enough soap and water. Maybe if every house in the country, or Liberia, was given a soap bar, we could lick this thing. (sarcasm but no pun intended)

      • Di Kelley

        My issue (Mainly), is with the fear mongering. Honestly, it’s not as contagious as everyone is trying to make it out to be, Is it dangerous? Of course it is! No one here, including myself, is saying it isn’t. But I am trying to point out that three cases, one of them from someone who brought it back *from* Africa, does not an outbreak make. In two more days everyone else that Duncan was exposed to will be outside the window during which it could have been transmitted.

      • strayaway

        “In two more days everyone else that Duncan was exposed to will be outside the window during which it could have been transmitted.”

        How do you figure? Two people he exposed now have ebola. They in turn have exposed other people. I would begin my calculations with 21 days after these two health care workers’ care takers and waste haulers have last been exposed.

      • Di Kelley

        They are also not contagious unless showing symptoms, and not *extremely* contagious unless showing the more serious symptoms. My point is that everyone is getting all terrified and up in arms about something that is not likely going to be this huge things, and handing out conspiracy theories and the like. Freaking out helps *no one.*

      • strayaway

        Taking precautions saves lives. We both agree with that. We also believe that sanitation, washing hands, and so forth is helpful. Where we disagree is in our assessment of the medical response to date and whether an embargo of some sort should be put on plane passengers from Liberia and Sierra Leone.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        mainly because their Benghazi beach-ball has deflated so much it looks like a tattoo on the ground in the FOX “news” studio

      • Steve Brains

        The best way to prevent infection from spreading is KILL THE HOST!!!

        Didn’t you see ‘ALIEN’?

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        second alien best one–

      • Oh, I get it. Movies determine how we should act. My God, you’re a moron.

      • Avatar

        Oh God must be sick of you using moron…

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        his steatopygous mommie called him that lovingly after sundays bible school————
        ………… he is simply sharing the love

      • Avatar

        ROFL!

      • mosquito

        Why are you so fixated on proving how moronic you are? Have you no self respect?

      • You’re hopelessly childish. You have absolutely nothing to refute me. So, you resort to childish mocking. Scripturally speaking, the mocker is one of the most vile persons on earth.

      • mosquito

        Why are you so fixated on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • You’re hopelessly childish. You think that you are actually scoring points with that pablum. All that you are doing is proving that you are an asshole.

      • mosquito

        No, God uses much more severe language of criticism than I use. For instance, he calls certain men fools. The Biblical word for fool does not mean a stupid person. It means something much worse than just being stupid.

      • No, God uses much more negative criticisms than moron. For instance, he calls people like I have been dealing with in this thread fools. The key characteristic of a fool is that he never comes to a knowledge of the truth. The fool is severely condemned in Scripture by God.

      • Steve Brains

        That’s what made Plague an isolated incident the days.

        Who thinks on of the 23 GErm warfare labs in the US was field testing one of their offspring on animals in the wild and it got out of hand?

        Other than the OLD Soviets, who else does extensive biological agent research and production on earth?

      • Spaceman Spiff

        No, there should not be any “discussion” about how to best prevent the spread. “Discussion” implies that there are still unknowns that need to be resolved. That is not the case here.

        The factual information about how to prevent the spread has already been determined. Any “conversation” about how to best prevent the spread should be one way – from the experts who know to the populace at large who doesn’t.

      • strayaway

        Except “authorities” also have different opinions about such things as temporary immigration restrictions form ebola infested countries and the possibility of the virus becoming airborne. The authorities gave the daughter of Ms. Troh the ok to go back to work just 10 days after dealing with Mr. Duncan’s soiled bedding. She questioned the authorities and decided to postpone going back to work. After all, the authorities also claim the virus has a 21 day, not 10 day, window.

      • Di Kelley

        Yes, it *can* have a 21 day window, but the *average* is 8-12 days. Meaning most would show symptoms within that 8-12 day window. Not all, and keeping them isolated for the full 21 days is the safest, but simply pointing that out.

      • Steve Brains

        Concepts before outlines, before details. Design, Literature, all science and mathematical genre`s have that basic organization as it’s main pillar.

        Sounds like a wise choice.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite the moron. What is the “it” in “it’s main pillar”? The beginning of your sentence talked about several things, not an it.

      • Steve Brains

        I think the conversation should be about how NOT TO LET the conversation become about Political Lies On RWM False News Propagandavision.

      • mosquito

        That’s nonsense. Discussion implies no such thing. You’re just moronically making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion that it does, which amounts to nothing.

        Yeah, let’s take care of the populace at large. I guess that we don’t need to bother with the rest of the populace, moron.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        Lighten up; culicidae. Grading proper sentence structure/idioms / spelling are inconsequential and non sequitur to political blogs. When u stay upon subject u write quite admirably.

      • You wrote: “are non sequitur to political blogs”. First of all, non is not a word, so non sequitur is not a phrase. Secondly, nonsequitur is not an adjective.

        My comments about people’s grammar is definitely consequential to political blogs. When I demonstrate that someone is a moron, then, hopefully, people will no longer pay attention to his political meanderings.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        fuuny: I also complimented thy writings and U ignored this–
        >>>> inner peace seems to elude you.<<<<<
        ======================================
        The best part? U indeed understand what I elucidated.

      • Your logic is atrocious. You have no basis, whatsoever, for your moronic conclusion that I ignored your compliment.

        You also have no basis, whatsoever, for your suggestion that inner peace seems to elude me. I have perfect inner peace. Taking to task blowhards and exposing them for the despicable people that they are in no way suggests that I have trouble with my inner peace. Jesus always had perfect inner peace but that did not stop him from driving the money changers out of the temple with a whip.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        wow– we do agree! I have no basis for the moronic conclusion that U indeed write admirably!
        ====================================
        my ‘faux pas’

      • You’re quite the moron. You’re changing the subject in midstream. So, your point here is a moronic straw man, which is one of the most basic of logical mistakes. Give it up. You’ve got nothing.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        (a) you didnt mention at all the ‘compliment’ ; ergo U have no proof that U did NOT ignore it
        (b) the above subject WAS the compliment ( ignored/ not ignored) so u are the one spinning the tattered web of obfuscation
        (c) I have nothing? Hmmmmm,,,,,,,,,,,, I seem to have U in a dither
        ***********************************************************

      • You’re a moron. It does not matter a hill of beans whether I have a proof that I did not ignore it. The fact that you think that that is relevant demonstrates that you have not got a clue about logic.

        No, you’ve got nothing. You have not proven anything and, besides that, all you have is bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amounts to nothing. So, you’ve got nothing.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        “logic is pretty flower……………. that’s smells bad”
        ==========================================
        SPOCK– ” I MUDD”

      • mosquito

        Why are you so intent on proving that you’re a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • Logic smells real good. And it’s a faithful friend. It never fails to refute the asinine meanderings of moronic minds.

      • Your logic is atrocious. The fact that I did not mention at all the compliment in no way, shape, or form implies that I have not proof that I did not ignore it. The fact that you think that it does imply this demonstrates that you are a brain-dead moron.

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. I am in no “dither”. It could not be easier to refute you. Your logic is so atrocious, I don’t have to look far to find a stupid mistake by you.

      • Avatar

        Moron!

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions add up to, nothing.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you most surely know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate what you post.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        “maroon”
        ( Bugs Bunny)

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • mosquito

        Why are you so devoted to proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • BB-Mystic

        Oooh! It’s still repeating itself!

        Still boring, dudelet.

        *flagged for being a sad logic-troll*

      • Yes, and I’m still wiping your ass off the floor.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate what you post.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you assuredly know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate what you post.

      • Avatar

        Yet another moron!!!

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        the(his) fruit doesnt fall far from the tree……………..
        wonder which troll he was before! ITISMYBALL? ITISOBAMASFAULT? OY HUMID? …………..he even has a surly part of matthew reece- but matthew has some superb topics occasionally
        =======================================
        maybe he is suckling the soon2be vanquished IVAN the RENKO

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing. For that is what your bald, unsubstantiated assertions add up to, nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls them fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate what you post.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing. For that is what your bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing. I proved that you are a moron. You just mindlessly assert that I am a moron. Making such an assertion is itself moronic.

      • BB-Mystic

        Oooh! It’s starting to repeat itself!

        Still boring, dudelet.

        *flagged*

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing. For that is what your bald, unsubstantiated
        assertions amount to, nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls them fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • Yes, and I’m still wiping your ass off the floor.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you surely know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate what you post.

      • You’re not saying anything, Avatar. Bald, unsubstantiated assertions are removed from the discussion. So, you have not begun to contribute to the discussion.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        and what proof do U have that JESUS had “perfect inner peace”?
        NOTE: CHRIST quite possibly was homosexual; factoring these———
        1– no wife
        2– no children
        3– never degraded homosexuality in writing or speech.
        4– MALE ( only) disciples
        ***********************************************************
        >>my basis for you being bereft of ” inner peace”?
        DATZZZ EASY !! Your ineluctable weakness in comprehension and vocabulary.
        ***********************************************************
        and,,,pray tell– whom exactly are U exposing the (non factual; thus opined) despicable people to?
        are U that little kid who is out of step in band class; yet his (your) mom claims that the OTHER students are misstepping?
        lemme know– and keep that pedantic entertainment flowing our way!!

      • mosquito

        We know that Jesus was anointed of the Holy Spirit and that the Holy Spirit produces perfect inner peace.

        Your logic is atrocious. None of your observations about Jesus imply, or even suggest, that he was “quite possibly” a homosexual. Besides, what is your point?

        You don’t have a basis for me being “bereft of “inner peace””. All that you have is a bald, unsubstantiated assertion, which amounts to nothing. So, you have not begun to make a contribution to this thread.

        I am exposing the despicable people in question to all the readers of this thread, including the despicable people in question.

        Now, I am not the little kid who is out of step in band class. I am not even a little kid, moron.

      • BB-Mystic

        Pray tell, who appointed you the thread police? You aren’t the owner of this site. Did Allen Clifton give you express permission to troll here?

        We were having a nice, normal, productive conversation, until you came along and screwed it up.

        *flagged for being a pompous ass*

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate what you write.

      • Jesus was anointed with the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is The Comforter. So, Jesus had inner peace by the indwelling of The Comforter, given to Him at His anointing.

      • BB-Mystic

        Actually, dudelet, what it means is that people will no longer pay attention to YOU. You are not the owner of this site, and you have nothing to say about what goes on here. By spewing all this nonsense, you’ve defined yourself as a classic tiresome troll. The conversation will go on regardless, and I, and others, will continue to participate in it, no matter how many times you spit “moron” at us.

      • You’ve got nothing, BB-Mystic. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        Does capitalizing you make your statement more true?

        Your statement about the owner of this site is a moronic straw man, one of the most basic of logical mistakes. It’s not surprising that you would make such a mistake. After all, you’re a moron.

        I have not spewed any nonsense. Every single one of my posts has been eminently logical, as any competent logician will confirm.

        I have not defined myself as any sort of troll, never mind a “classic tiresome troll”. Yet you make a bald, unsubstantiated assertion that I have. That amounts to nothing, which is what you have, nothing.

        As my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in their mouth.

      • BB-Mystic

        (Yawn) Yeah, whatever, dudelet. You’re still boring.

      • mosquito

        Why are you so bent upon proving what a moron you are? Bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing. And yet you continue to moronically make bald, unsubstantiated assertions.

      • BB-Mystic

        Still boring, dudelet!!

        *flagged for being a stupid redundant logic-troll*

      • mosquito

        Why are you so bent upon proving that you are a moron? Bald,
        unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing. And yet you continue to
        moronically make bald, unsubstantiated assertions.

      • Yeah, I’m still wiping your ass of the floor.

      • mosquito

        As is the case with all of your posts, with not even a single exception, you’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        The Scriptures accurately describe people like you. It calls such people fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        It does not matter a hill of beans whether I am boring. I’m still wiping your ass off the floor.

      • mosquito

        As is the case with all of your posts, without exception, you’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        The Scriptures accurately describe people like you. It calls such people fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        Considering thy paucity of political “meanderings” and your battology here recently I will submit that the ‘testarudo’ intransigence that U invoke so delightfully(??) televises to all of us who indeed the moron is-
        ========================================
        >>>>keep up the entertaining work!!!

      • BB-Mystic

        Hear, hear!

        I love word salad, especially directed at pitiful logic-trolls. *hee hee hee*

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        awwww,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, shucks: its just fun!!
        =======================================
        I keep the heat off of the rest of U as I get my “lexiphania” in play and thus; cripple these trolls to where they MUST use all of their receding energy on ME!!
        ========================================
        I will charge U ” fitty centz”

      • mosquito

        Why are you so dedicated to proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • mosquito

        As is always the case with your posts, without fail, you have nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls such people fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • mosquito

        You’re full of crap. All of my posts in this thread have been eminently intelligent. They prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, to any objective reader, that I am a man of eminent intelligence. You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing, moron.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        I miss calvin and hobbes

      • Calvin and Hobbes is my oldest son’s favorite comic strip.

      • Steve Brains

        NOt on FOX it isn’t! And if you hadn’t CHANGED The flow of the debate to “THE DEFENSE OF THE LOWEST RATED NETWORK FOR HONESTY” we might still be woykin heah!

      • mosquito

        Are you in the habit of moronically stating meaningless tautologies?

      • BB-Mystic

        Yes, I am, in your royal meaningless moron-proclaiming view at least. So? Get over it.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        He does impart the word ‘ moron’ almost exclusively-
        …………..and seems to have a vereration for ‘ tautologies’

      • Oh, really, he imparts a word. If you’re going to use the word impart, find out what it means. Otherwise, your stupid may be showing.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        hey Einstein,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, if U care to exchange aspersions; shouldnt U start with sumpin’ more luminary ….such as oligophrenial instead of ‘stupid’? ( stupidity applied above fits better anyway)
        =====================================
        so sorry to encroach upon your velleity towards that ostensible preponderance in OVER using certain words.
        ********************************************************
        I was hoping U housed a better “lexiphania”-

      • If you are going to use the word, luminary, then you should find out what it means. Otherwise, your stupid may be showing.

        No, I chose stupid and moronic because they communicate what I wanted to communicate. Oligophrenial would not communicate that.

        You’ve certainly demonstrated that you are a moron. You’re doing a very poor imitation of Professor Irwin Corey. He was at least funny.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        “luminary”…………….. ( among other definitions) — a body that gives light
        =====================================
        please excuse my STOOOOPIDITY in not recognizing your palinoia.
        Now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, about the mental expansion of looking up words,,,,
        —such as ‘oligophrenial’

      • You’re quite the moron. You were not using the noun form of luminary. You were using the adjective form of luminary. So, the noun form of luminary is irrelevant to our discussion.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        im sorry,,,,,,,,,,,, I was crippled with alternating laughter and crying
        ======================================
        could U edify me with the DEFINITION of “luminary”?

      • No, you can’t be edified. You’re too enamored with your own thought patterns. You’re a conceited arrogant prick.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        this was fun,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        lets do it again– Im off 2 the beach ( se fla pompano beach) waves today!
        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
        and,,,,,get some new insults!

      • You’re a loser. I’m not surprised that you’re going to the beach. You’re obviously a bum.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        bummmm? me??? hey gerbil droppings: not only do I have (here in FLA) 2 LLCs — self employed chef and antique car show proprietor– but my TAXABLE income is generated by 4 ( 2 commercial/2 residential) properties here in Broward county. OH– as a BUM I should inform thy erroneous self that they have been paid 4 since 2002- thus the income splashed all across my beachbum self is considered ‘passive residual income’ …… exceeding my expenditures (nicely) and my residence ( 352 yds from atlantic ocean) bought last yr will be fully paid off feb 2015 ( silly condo 2200sq ft)
        =======================================
        not gonna BORE U with numbers regarding my 2 “limited liability” endeavors but they are CASH ( chef 100%; car & truck shows around 80-90%)
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,, the fun part? Market savvy trader/investor!!! shall I name the holdings and entry points and avg prices paid? Todays option action?
        ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or: would that LOSER dialogue annoy your WINNER status?
        *********************************************************
        BYTHEWAY– bovaristic is much more paranomasial that conceited; donnnn’cha think?
        Now; about that obtuse spelling error U sparkled with ——

      • mosquito

        You just proved that you’re a bum. Thanks for saving me the trouble.

      • mosquito

        You just proved that you are a bum. Thanks for saving me the trouble.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        your evisceration is complete- as evidenced by your ^^^^^ above retreat.
        signed……………..
        your favorite beach bum
        ======================================
        please enjoy the photo of my “toy”– 1972 MACH1 mustang. 568 HP……
        and,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, shall we accessorize your nimble spelling of ”lumiinary”?

      • BB-Mystic

        1972 Mustang Mach One? Holy crapola, dude. I wouldn’t mind a picture of that myself.

        Carry on. 🙂

      • mosquito

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. Keep telling yourself that you’ve got the upper hand with me. You’re so deranged, you’ll probably eventually believe it.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        no upper hand,,,,,,,,,,,, as its not a competition
        ====================================
        simply — I live a better healthier life than you do in a much more utopian part of America– and Im not carrying your guilt or your paunch—–
        **********************************************************
        here is a oct 11 photo of me with my 14 month old pet TEGU— quite thelyphthoric as pets they are!
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, about your oct 2012 MSU classroom show of mental health,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        care to expound upon that>????

        LOVE YA!!

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

        Your posts are proving that you are a moron and you are an asshole.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Thanks for proving that you’re a bum.

      • Avatar

        Moron… Moronic… Moronmoojnon… Sorry it’s mind boggling for how often you are using moron on others…

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        read my castigations of him,,,,,,,,,,,,
        -he’s really quite limited!

      • mosquito

        That’s complete garbage. I am eminently intelligent, not limited.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you know for sure.

        That’s why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        It does not matter a hill of beans whether you find it mind boggling. I have never said that anyone was a moron unless I proved that they were a moron.

      • Avatar

        I has counted more than 20 times you were using the friggin ‘moron’ words on like 10 different commenters.

      • mosquito

        So what? If people are being moronic that often, then pointing it out is entirely appropriate.

      • It does not matter a hill of beans how often I use the word moron. The fact that you think that it does, proves that you are a moron.

        As often as the people with whom I am engaging in this thread do something moronic, I’m going to point out that they are morons, if I so choose.

      • Avatar

        Huh? My comment is for mosquito… Unless you’re the same commenter. Oh man I really thought you’re done with this old shit.

      • BB-Mystic

        Your “proof” means nothing in the real world, dudelet.

        Still boring.

        *flagged*

      • mosquito

        No, your bald, unsubstantiated assertions mean nothing in the real world. My proofs are very significant in the real world. Your lack of appreciation of this demonstrates what a brute you are.

      • BB-Mystic

        “Thou hath not so much brain as ear wax.”

        ~Troilus and Cressida

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

        You are quite a jackass.

      • You’re hopelessly self-deluded. My proof (not “proof”) means everything in the real world. It’s a proof according to standard logic, logic as it has been practiced for centuries. the logic which is basically common sense. It’s fully down to earth. It’s not some esoteric philosophy. It is the rules of reasoning. By opposing this logic and its corresponding proofs, you are demonstrating yourself to be a barbarian.

      • Yeah, it’s mind boggling how often the people I am engaging with in this thread do something moronic. Even if they were behaving according to probability, they would do better than they’re doing.

      • mosquito

        You’re full of crap up to the top of your head. I have not stated a single tautology.

      • You obviously don’t know what is a tautology.

      • Well, then, you’re a moron.

      • BB-Mystic

        Yes. And? (yawn) You’re boring, dudelet.

      • As my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in your mouth.

        I am most definitely not boring. You’re too stupid to appreciate what I am accomplishing here, exposing people like you for being the blowhards that you are.

      • BB-Mystic

        (Yawn) Yeah, whatever, dudelet. If you believe that shit, more power to you. I’m still talking, and you’re still boring.

      • mosquito

        Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing. Yet you continue to make bald, unsubstantiated assertions. You may be still talking, but you’re not saying anything, because bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being a boring redundant logic-troll*

      • mosquito

        Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls them fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • And I’m still wiping your pathetic ass off the floor.

      • And I’m still wiping your sorry ass off the floor.

      • And I’m still wiping your ass right off the floor.

      • Avatar

        Well, then, you’re a moron, moronic dude.

      • mosquito

        You’re logic is atrocious. Your premise does not imply your conclusion. Your just making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion, which amounts to nothing. So, that’s what you’ve put forward, nothing.

      • BB-Mystic

        Ooo! It’s starting to repeat itself!

        Still boring, dudelet.

        *flagged*

      • mosquito

        Why are you so infatuated with proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • And I’m still wiping your ass off the floor.

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. Your premise does not imply your conclusion. And, yet, you claim that it does. That demonstrates what a moron you are.

      • You’re quite illogical. You have no proof of this assertion. You are just mindlessly asserting it. You think that that accomplishes something. That proves that you are a moron.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite the moron. The Ebola virus cannot possibly be a conflicting view point because it’s not a viewpoint.

      • BB-Mystic

        Except I didn’t call it that, Jim Bean did. (Actually, his comment referred to how Fox News talked about Ebola.) See the quote marks? Read his comment at the beginning of the thread.

      • Nonsense, you did call it that. You wrote: “The Ebola virus, just like climate change, is not something that should be up for “discussion” as a “conflicting view point.”” The fact that you put quotes around it does not cancel the fact that you’re using it as part of your sentence, not merely by way of quoting someone to make it clear what he said.

    • Steve Brains

      Not REALLY!!!! their focus is FEARMONGERING and like fishmongering, it’s a stinkin’ way to make a living.

  • Jim Valley

    Today’s conservatives are addicted to that sweet rush of fear, outrage, and hate that Fox “News” pleasures them with so well. They can’t go a day without it.

    • Steve Brains

      Ever notice that when blindfolded, Anxiety and anticipation FEEL identical? Quick pulse, short breathing, sweat, muscle tension. Bowel and bladder pressures. Racing thoughts.

      Imagine what it must be like to be a Republican on Christmas morning. Terrified of reaching under the tree.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        lets tell all regressive republican trash that their nice new ” Christmas” tree is actually an African pine

      • Nemisis

        They would love it. The trees get really big and have a lot of room for “gifts” from people like General E., Haliburton, Coche, Hobby Lobby, Exxon/Mobile, BP, Shell, Mega-churches and other inanimate lifeforms only by law.

      • mosquito

        Thanks for saving me the effort of proving that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        do U like my photo of U sitting HANDCUFFED — nest to the police– in MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY HALLWAY in october 2012 when U RAN AROUND NUDE while screaming an hitting your head on the glass windows in the CLASS THAT U ARE PAID TO “teach”?
        ========================================
        your meltdown mentally is chronicalled; your sexual ‘predation'(??) is here in photo form– for all of us to see: and if they cannot see the photo I have here CLEARLY enough I beg them to go to GOOGLE with ” JOHN McCARTHY NUDE MELTDOWN M.S.U. IN OCT 2012 ” so they can all see how ” logically” U ran around nude ( U did have those matching socks on though;) which seemingly DID amount to a NON bald hill of beans assertion–
        ======================================
        and even though U are grossly overweight in that photo; I ask– how small are you?? 5’6″???
        I love being your favorite MORON,,,,donnnnnchu?

      • Thanks for saving me the effort of proving that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • No, I don’t love being my favorite moron. I’m not even a moron.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        your reading comprehension ” skills” have dissipated–
        I said I LOVE BEING your FAVE MORON
        =======================================
        prescriptions will help; both in eyewear and with ADD

      • mosquito

        You’re very dumb. You wrote this: “I love being your favorite MORON,,,,donnnnnchu?” In other words, you said this: I love being your favorite moron. Don’t you love being your favorite moron. I realize that you are too stupid to realize that that is what you wrote, but that is what you wrote. So, I answered it correctly, moron.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        wrong again,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        it clearly asks the question,,,, ” don’t U love me being your favorite moron?
        your comprehension is lacking- that’s why we all love you
        ………and that cuuuuute little escapade when u ran around naked— at your work– and got handcuffed and dragged away to the ” hospital’
        ******************************************************
        did they let U keep your socks?

      • Your stupid is showing. You obviously don’t know the rules of antecedents. Your question means exactly what I said it means. Don’t venture into English. You clearly don’t know about what you are talking.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        ” I love being your favorite moron….. donnnnnchu”?
        do I really have to place ” love me being your fave moron” after donnnnchu?????/
        really john? really??? having a tough time with humor today? really john???
        ======================================
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,about your well deserved nervous breadown October 2012 which got U handcuffed and sitting naked in that chilly MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSIRT corridor ,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        was that an effort in LOGIC; or perhaps U just making a fashion statement?
        let us all know how that helped U regain such needed self ‘exposure’ to your ostensible plight of insanity and desire to have your fellow employees notice your pathetic — and supremely logical- overweight napiform self
        ***************************************************
        did the police handcuff you; or were U ‘logically’ able to do it for them?

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You cannot put “love me being your fave moron” after donnnnchu?????/

        Writing something moronic because you’re a moron is not writing something humorous, moron.

        You’ve got nothing, moron. Your position is thoroughly bankrupt. Give it up. All that you are doing is repeatedly, post after post, demonstrating that you are a moron.

        In particular, you repeatedly construct straw men. Constructing straw men is a moronic activity.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        replying to strawmen “activity” seems to be the impudicity of a person ( seen here) who runs around naked after screaming officiously just before being subdued — and handcuffed– by school authorities ( see: oct 2012 Michigan state university math teacher meltdown) and photographed as the anserine ” winner” that he is-
        ************************************************************
        but; never as a moron- that would be illogical

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing. Give it up. You’re a loser.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        your collapse here is accelerating john-
        U used to be fun; now redundantly droll
        ==================================
        should I place your photo up again? seems bovaristic of me to slam trolls with MY pics; donnnncha think so?

      • You’re hopelessly self-deluded. You have convinced yourself that you are on top of this discussion with me. Nothing could be further from the truth. You are just a pathetic loser who lost this debate a long time ago, but are too narcissistic to realize it.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        debate? Im not debating anything————
        Im poking fun at a socially stultified “winner” who showed his logical approach to life by screaming incoherently and exacerbating his spiritual malaise by stripping down in front of his ‘students’ and then being handcuffed and led away for observation
        ========================================
        is the above event open for debate?
        if so; I allow U to proceed with your prolegomena

      • You obviously don’t know what it means to debate. For that is precisely what you have been doing for some time now. So, you’re full of crap about not debating.

        Again, you’ve got nothing.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        wrong again,,,,,,,,,,,,,,as debated imbue facts:
        I give facts
        U venture opinions
        *******************************************
        ergo our chit-chat is not truly a debate
        ***********************************************
        its me poking fun at your socially inept self

      • As I said, you obviously don’t know what it means to debate.

        Again, you’ve got nothing, for the reasons previously given.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        I prefer to “debate” that I have nothing…………….
        except the facts about your loonytunes nude rant and run at the school U teach at,,,,,,,,,, and the photo( see: MY AVATAR) to prove my case that U are indeed LOGICAL.
        =======================================
        now,,,,,,,about my baseball math query which U cannot answer
        >.should I get Earvin ” magic” Johnson to sign the photo of you sitting NUDE next 2 the police who handcuffed you?

      • mosquito

        There is no exception to the statement that you have nothing. You have nothing, period.

        Your photo does not prove that I am logical. Your photo does not prove that I am illogical. In fact, your photo does not prove anything, as I have previously explained.

        You have no proof that I cannot answer your baseball math query. All you have is a bald, unsubstantiated assertion. In other words, you have nothing.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        hey john NUDE RUN McCarthy ( oct 1 2012 MSU campus),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        U said I do NOT EVER provide facts
        ====================================
        above are the facts of your documented mental MELTDOWN on campus (MSU) October 2012,,,,,,,,,
        shall we ‘ debate” the veracity of those facts?
        OR— will U spinaway with your extremely limited
        usage of such dead and drying words such as bald and assertions and strawmen and moronic and LOGICAL??
        we love U john,,,,,,,,,,,,,, as much as your students who witnessed and chronicled your wonderfully inept insane meltdown,,,,,with handcuffs and nudity and photos to prove that U were–and remain– highly unhappy and insane,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,insane,,,,,,,,,,,insane,,,,,,,insane,,,,,,,,,,,,,

      • mosquito

        Once again, you’ve proven that you are a moron. You have not provided facts. You’ve interpreted your facts and in the process you’ve moronically raised a straw man. It must be very difficult to function without a brain.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        “I have NOT provided facts”
        =============================
        john; baybeeeeeeeeeeee————- exactly what constitutes “providing facts” in your picayune life?
        **********************************************************
        lemme know– this oughta be good

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I enlarged upon what I meant by saying that you were not using facts. You interpret your facts and your interpretations are false. So, this invalidates your using of facts. Hence, effectively, you’re not using facts. To put it differently, you’re not using facts, you’re abusing facts. There is a big difference between using and abusing.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you obviously know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • You’re a pathological liar. You write: “I give facts.” This is total bullshit. You interpret the facts you give. That’s making an argument. That’s carrying on a debate. Your arguments are moronic. In particular, they involve the erection of straw men. Nevertheless, they are arguments.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        allow me to lay some more ” meirda del toro” facts upon thee:
        FACT- oct 1 2012 john McCarthy (YOU) went beserk by screaming and slamming parts of yourself against windows– while ‘teaching’ at MSU
        FACT- oct 1 2012 you (John McCarthy) then decided to go naked ( keeping his socks on ONLY) in full display at around 12:45pm that day
        FACT- YOU ( the eminent prof McCarthy) then was shackled By THE M.S.U. police
        FACT- your scantily clad obese self was photographed by at least one student while you were seated upright ( adorned by handcuffs behind your back)against the hallway wall whilst next2 police

      • mosquito

        Yes, once again you’ve engaged in the moronic activity of erecting straw men.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. My mental breakdown is totally irrelevant to the issue at hand. The fact that you think it is relevant demonstrates what a moron you are.

      • Nemisis

        It is completely relevant. You are mired in another such episode right now. Don’t worry though, there are some nice young men coming to fit you for your very own “I love me” jacket.

      • mosquito

        Nonsense, it is totally irrelevant.

        You’ve got nothing. Your post is hopelessly childish. It’s like a kid whose classmate did better than him on the last test and the kid says, “you’re a poopy pant”.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        in your case john,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, U cannot have had ‘poopy pants’
        ========================================
        poopy socks maybe,,,,,but as U were sitting nude and handcuffed for the MSU school to see we all agree that U were NOT guilty of poopypants
        ==================================
        unless,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        MAYBE THATS WHY U WENT NUUUUDE????

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. Our discussion is not limited to the day of my mental breakdown, moron.

        Indeed, as I have previously pointed out, my mental breakdown is irrelevant to the issue at hand. Your fixation upon it demonstrates that you are a moron. You haven’t got a clue about what we are talking.

      • Nemisis

        To quote Rosencrantz of Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
        Act 3 scene 1 15th word.

        “no”

      • You are quite the moron. You’ve got nothing, as I have proven.

      • Nemisis

        Are you saying that Rosencrantz’s fifteenth word in scene one act three of Hamlet authored by a fellow named Shakespeare is not in fact “no”?

      • mosquito

        The fact that you are asking me that question demonstrates what a moron you are.

      • The fact that you are asking this question demonstrates how illogical you are.

      • Nemisis

        dumb ass

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, the fact that you are asking this question demonstrates how illogical you are.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Like I said, the fact that you are asking this question demonstrates how illogical you are.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        There’s more of your word magic.

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        There’s more of your word magic.

        As I said, the fact that you are asking this question demonstrates how illogical you are.

      • Like I said, the fact that you are asking this question demonstrates how illogical you are.

      • You believe in word magic. You believe that by asserting something you have established it.

      • The fact that you ask this question demonstrates what a moron you are.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never even make a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • There you go again, proving that you’re enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • No, it is completely relevant. Your logic is clearly absent if you think that it is relevant.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, it is completely irrelevant. The fact that you think that it is relevant demonstrates what an abysmal hold you have upon logic.

      • Anyone who thinks that it is relevant has not got a clue as to what it means to say that a statement is relevant to a proof. Once again, you’ve proven that you’re addicted to word magic.

      • Anyone who thinks that it is relevant does not know what it means to say that a given assertion is relevant to a given argument. Once again, you’ve proven that you are addicted to word magic.

      • Anyone who thinks that this is relevant does not understand what it means to say that a given assertion is relevant to a given argument. ¥ou’re clearly addicted to word magic.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite the moron. There is nothing logical about social behavior. A man kisses a woman. There is nothing logical about that. A man cries. There is nothing logical about that. The fact that you bring up logic and social behavior in the same breath demonstrates what a moron you are. Being able to discern patterns in human behavior in no way, shape, or form implies that human behavior is logical.

      • mosquito

        You’re a bullshit artist. You keep engaging in the fraudulent activity of pretending to know things that you don’t know. You’re a con artist, trying to get people to believe that you are an intellectual, when in fact you are just a moron.

      • Nemisis

        Actually, the fact that you did those things means they are not bullshit. The event is forever chronicled on the web, and in print for all to see. Pictures, testimony, video, student reviews, peer reviews, social reviews.
        You are more famous for your lack of decorum than your ability to solve word problems.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. You’re constructing another straw man. To say that someone is a bullshit artist is not to say that he was talking about bullshit. It’s to say that what he said about the things he talked about was bullshit. It’s like your last sentence. For one thing, mathematicians don’t solve word problems, moron.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        u win!!!!
        U are quite correct that “mathematicians don’t solve word problems”
        ======================================
        we have a plethora of your limited droll posts to confirm this .
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,about your running naked in the halls of MSU campus –as a “teacher”- on OCT 1 2012
        ,,,,,,was that logical? certainly NOT a “bald–er–dash” !!!

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. My posts cannot possibly confirm the statement that mathematicians don’t solve word problems. That’s like saying that my sleeping confirms that I’m never awake. My God, you’re lacking a functioning brain.

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I have already dispensed with your gibberish about your nonsensical concept of things being socially logical.

      • mosquito

        That’s quite interesting. You have a plethora of something limited. My God, you are a moron.

      • So, you have a plethora of something limited. That’s quite strange.

      • Nemisis

        Haha, I made you chose a word other than “erecting”.
        You dolt, of course they solve word problems. You don’t. You can’t.
        Almost everyone can solve word problems and they do everyday.
        You can’t, so don’t and it shows.

      • You’re a bullshit artist. You don’t know what you are talking about. Mathematicians do not solve word problems. You have not got a clue as to what it means to be a mathematician. Don’t venture into mathematics. You have not got a clue about mathematics. You probably also think that mathematicians add up numbers.

      • Nemisis

        Well, if they don’t use numbers or words, then they just make shit up.
        Is that what you are trying to say. They just pull shit out of their ass and say this is what is and that is what isn’t.
        All math can be considered addition. No mater how complex you care to write an equation or a formula it is all addition even when you are subtracting.
        Go on Monkey McToady, tell me how i am wrong. Prooooove it.

        Because you have such problems with words I will give you a hint.
        You are being baited.

      • mosquito

        You’re a bullshit artist. You don’t know about what you are talking.

        You’re quite illogical. Your opening two sentences raise a straw man. Raising a straw man is a moronic activity.

        You’re full of crap. Most of mathematics has nothing whatsoever to do with addition. Also, most of mathematics has nothing to do with equations or formulas.

        You’re hopelessly confused. You are not performing addition when performing subtraction. I’ve never met anyone as stupid as you.

        You are not baiting anyone. You’re too stupid to be able to bait anyone.

      • Your logic is atrocious.

        Subtraction is not addition. Your very dumb to think that one is doing addition when one is doing subtraction.

        There are plenty of mathematical subjects that don’t involve equations and formulas.

        You can’t bait anyone. You’re too dumb to do that.

      • Nemisis

        care to prove subtraction is not addition

        bet you can’t

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Yes, addition is associative. Subtraction is not associative. Hence, subtraction is not addition. If subtraction were addition, then subtraction would have to be associative, which it is not.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Yes, if subtraction were addition, then it would have to be associative, like addition. But, subtraction is not associative. For instance, (3 – 2) – 1 = 0 is not equal to

        3 – (2 – 1) = 2. Hence, subtraction is not addition.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        If subtraction were addition, then subtraction would be associative, like addition. But subtraction is not associative. For instance, (3 – 2) – 1 = 0, but
        3 – (2 – 1) = 2. So, subtraction is not addition.

      • If subtraction were addition, then subtraction would be associative, like addition. But, subtraction is not associative. For instance, (3 – 2) – 1 = 0, whereas,

        3 – (2 – 1) = 2, and 0 is not equal to 2. Hence, subtraction is not addition.

      • If subtraction were addition, then subtraction would be associative, like addition. But, (3 – 2) – 1 = 0,

        3 – (2 – 1) = 2 and 0 is not equal to 2. Hence, subtraction is not associative. Therefore, subtraction is not addition.

      • Don’t venture into mathematics. You have not got a clue about mathematics.

        You’re full of crap. Not all math can be considered addition. As I said, don’t venture into mathematics. You have not got a clue about mathematics.

        There are plenty of equations that have absolutely nothing to do with addition.

        Subtraction is most definitely not addition.

        You’re a bullshit artist.

      • You didn’t make me choose anything.

        Don’t venture into mathematics. You have not got a clue about what mathematicians put their labors into solving. They certainly don’t spend their time solving word problems, which even students are able to solve.

      • You’re very confused. Saying that someone is a bullshit artist is not saying that he talks about bullshit. It is saying that what he says about what he talks about is bullshit.

      • Nemisis

        so you admit your talking about bullshit making you a bullshit artist

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your logic is atrocious.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your statements. s

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • Your logic is atrocious. I admit no such thing.

      • You’re quite confused. Bullshit artists don’t talk about bullshit. What they have to say about what they are talking about is bullshit.

      • You’re quite confused. To say that someone is a bullshit artist is not to say that the things he talks about are bullshit. Rather, it is to say, that what he has to say about them is bullshit.

      • You’re very confused. The things that a bullshit artist talks about need not be bullshit. What he has to say about these things is bullshit. You’re hopelessly enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • Your logic is atrocious. You continually raise straw men. Raising straw men is a moronic activity.

      • Nemisis

        Why are you fixated on the erections of straw men?
        Penis envy?

      • mosquito

        You’re deeply confused. I’ve not said a thing about the “erections of straw men”. I’ve talked about erecting straw men. There’s quite a difference between those two things, moron.

      • Nemisis

        ” they involve the erection of straw men.”

        Clearly, you are fixated with the erection of straw men.

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. The fact that I point out the erection of straw men in no way, shape, or form implies that I am fixated with this procedure.

      • Nemisis

        I have never heard of the penis referred to as a “procedure”.
        I have heard of procedures preformed on penises.
        Did you have a procedure? Not likely, I think you preformed the procedure. Nothing wrong with that, to each their own.
        Have fun with that.

      • You’re a moron. Your reading comprehension is atrocious. Of course, that’s not surprising. After all, you’re a moron. I did not refer to a penis as a procedure. I referred to the erection of straw men as a procedure.

      • Nemisis

        “The fact that I point out the erection of straw men in no way, shape, or form implies that I am fixated with this procedure.”

        ” they involve the erection of straw men.”

        Clearly, you are fixated with the erection of straw men.

        Clearly you fail to realize that no matter what you say I can and will spin it. There is only one way for you to prevent this, yet I doubt you have the ability or the “no”ledge to carry out a task of such complexity.

      • mosquito

        You are hopelessly self deluded. You have not succeeded in successfully spinning anything. Your attempts always fall flat, because you’re too stupid to give a plausible spin.

      • No, clearly you are fixated with the erection of straw men. i dispensed with the discussion of this topic and you still want to talk about it.

      • Nemisis

        no strawman boner fiend that is you.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, clearly you are fixated with the erection of straw men. I
        dispensed with the discussion of this topic and you still want to talk
        about it.

        You cannot spin anything. You’re too dumb to give a plausible spin to anything.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, clearly you are fixated with the erection of straw men. I dispensed with the discussion of this topic and you still want to talk about it.

        You cannot spin anything. You’re too dumb to give a plausible spin to anything.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, it is very clear that you are fixated with the erection of straw men. I dispensed with the discussion of this topic and you still want to talk about it.

        You cannot spin anything. You’re too dumb to give a plausible spin to anything.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, it is very clear that you are fixated with the erection of straw men. I dispensed with the discussion of this topic and you still want to talk about it.

        You cannot spin anything. You’re too dumb to give a plausible spin to anything.

      • No, it’s very clear that you are fixated on the erection of straw men. I dispensed with the discussion of this topic and you still want to talk about it.

        You cannot spin anything. You’re too dumb to give a plausible spin to anything.

      • No, you are clearly fixated with the erection of straw men. I dispensed with the discussion of this topic and you still want to talk about it.

        You cannot spin anything. You’re too dumb to give a plausible spin to anything.

      • No, I’ve already proven that you are the one who is fixated with the erection of straw men, not me.

        You cannot spin anything that anyone says. You are too stupid to come up with a plausible spin.

      • Your silly. I never said the penis is a “procedure”. I said that the erection of a straw man is a procedure.

      • The fact that I speak about the erection of straw men in no way, shape, or form implies that I am fixated with this procedure.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your logic is atrocious. My talking about the erection of straw men in no way, shape, or form implies that I am fixated with the erection of straw men.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • I have already dispensed with this argument, proving that it is you who is fixated with the erection of straw men. So, that is an established fact.

      • mosquito

        Don’t venture into psychology. You have not got a clue about psychology.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        based upon your socially reprehensible — and socially inept– 0ct 1 2012 nudity expose I will timidly venture that you-indeed– know quite abit about ‘psychology’
        =================================
        shall I mention which TYPE of psychology; johnnie boy?

      • mosquito

        You’re quite the moron. With all the posts you have posted in response to me you have yet to contribute anything to this discussion.

      • You’ve got nothing, gian keys, and you know it.That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • Don’t venture into psychology. You have not got a clue about psychology.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Don’t venture into psychology. You don’t have a clue about psychology.

      • I have already dispensed with this straw man. I showed that you are the one fixated with the erections of straw men, not me. Don’t venture into psychology. You have not got a clue about psychology.

      • I’ve already shown that it is you that is fixated on the erections of straw men, not I. This is confirmed by the fact that you are still talking about them now. You just can’t get your mind off of them. Don’t venture into psychology. You have not got a clue about psychology.

      • Nemisis

        It is important to recognize that Mosquito verified that JDMA is using facts.

        “You interpret the facts you give.”

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. Given that JDMA is interpreting his facts and, moreover, interpreting them wrongly, it is completely irrelevant that JDMA is using facts. So, it cannot have any importance whatsoever to recognize that JDMA is using facts.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        any interpretation of facts– interpreted by YOU john Mccarthy– are mitigated by the FACT that you (n oct 2012) melted down mentally and socially by slamming yourself against windows and screaming incoherently and then getting naked and FINALLY being handcuffed and led away by POLICE . That type of “logical; assertive” behavior is always always always served to society by a NON logical moron who has severe ineluctable mental ( and spiritual) issues ; thus- that sad decomposing individual has no exegetical right to interpret anything,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, except MAYBE some useless mathematical book
        =====================================
        you are a loser john,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, losers do what U have done recently; losers do what U do now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, losers look as U do,,,,losers lose
        —————————————————————–
        and,,,,,dear johm Mccarthy- U lose all the time: that’s why U remain so happy and prove that by your purulent writings seen here daily.

      • You’ve got nothing, gian keys, and you know it.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions. Don’t give me your bullshit about facts. You don’t use facts. You make bald, unsubstantiated assertions about your facts.

      • It is irrelevant that JDM is using facts. He interprets these facts and his interpretations are false. So, his use of these facts is illegitimate.

      • Nemisis

        like you are

        illegitimate

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know for sure.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you surely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Guest

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate even a single one of your posts.

      • I am definitely legitimate. I have substantiated all of my posts with eminently logical reasoning.

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you very well know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your posts.

      • Guest

        I am thoroughly legitimate.

        You have absolutely nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • You believe in word magic, in the concept that by asserting something, you have established it.

      • It is irrelevant that gian keys has facts. His interpretation of these facts is false. Hence, his use of these facts is illegitimate.

      • Nemisis

        Nah, JDM…it is you who have “know” idea about debate.

      • mosquito

        You’re deeply confused. I am eminently gifted at debate.

      • Nemisis

        More facts not in evidence.
        Inversely there is strong evidence to conclude you have no skill in debate at all.

      • mosquito

        You’re hopelessly deluded. The fact that I am eminently gifted at debate is a fact that is in evidence. There is no evidence that I have no skill in debate at all. You are just moronically making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion to that effect.

      • Nemisis

        we have not seen any evidence that indicates your gifted at anything let alone debate all of your posts including your posts where you dont belittle people there are only two

      • That’s a bold faced lie. There is abundant evidence in my posts that I am gifted at logical reasoning and its application to debating. Calling a moron a moron is not belittling him.

      • Nemisis

        nope dont see any evidence all i see are grandiose claims with unsubstantiated statements used to confirm the unverifiable claims

        in debate those are called illogical fallacies and falls under the intellectually dishonest forms of debate and would cause you to lose the debate simply by being pointed out
        when you make a claim and the claim is challenged you are responsible to provide verifiable proof of which nothing you claim is verifiable
        my best friend socrates has told me your are an idiot for believing that just because you say something four hundred seventy six times does not make it the truth unless your are of course an idiot like paul ryan

        being a moron and calling another a moron and thinking that it is not belittling is moronic
        by the way socrates is not really my best friend it was wrong of me to claim so i dont really like him he just has the best chip dip and brings the best beer on sunday okay that was lie too it’s not the best beer but he’s buying so who am i to say otherwise

      • mosquito

        Your friend and you are both morons. I have substantiated everything I have asserted in this thread. This last post of yours is another string of bullshit. You’ve got nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • mosquito

        Your best friend and you are morons. I don’t believe that by repeating something it makes it true. I have never repeated anything in the hope that it would make it true. I have repeated things that have been previously established. That’s one of the reasons why you establish something, so that you can use it later on in your argument, moron.

      • mosquito

        You are truly a moron. You write: “used to confirm the unverifiable claims”. You cannot confirm unverifiable claims. It must be awfully difficult to function without a brain.

      • mosquito

        You write: “in debate those are called illogical fallacies and falls under the intellectually dishonest forms of debate”. You moronically went from the plural “those” to the singular “falls”. You are quite the moron.

      • Nemisis

        I don’t see it. Are you doing that thing again where you act like your quoting but change letters and words. Or, are you just seeing shit that ain’t there.
        Maybe both.

        I bet you are going to say something you think is witty.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. You don’t understand my explanation, which is altogether clear. Again, “those” is plural and “falls” is singular.

      • Nemisis

        falls?

      • You’re a pathological liar. People know what you did. I cut and pasted what I wrote. So, there was no mistake.

      • Nemisis

        You have no proof that you cut and pasted anything.
        You simply altered the text in your made up quote, in a pathetic attempt to discredit me. You don’t have the competence to cut and paste anything. That requires a high functioning brain, something that you are not in possession of.
        Only an idiot would reply to this post, and everyone knows it.
        Your lack of response is a “no-contest” statement.

      • I don’t need any proof.

        It’s an alternative explanation to yours.

        I previously proved that you are a liar. Hence, no one has to accept your version of the story.

        You’re an idiot. You believe in word magic. Only an idiot would believe in word magic.

      • You’ve got nothing. That is why you have never tried to substantiate your moronic assertions.

        You’re such a moron. Sure thing. You say that cutting and pasting “requires a high functioning brain”. Compared to your brain, I suppose that that might be true.

      • I don’t need any such proof.

        I have given an alternative explanation to yours.

        As I have previously proven, you are a liar. So nobody is obligated to accept your version of the story.

      • You’re an utter moron. None of your premises imply the corresponding conclusion.

      • I do not need proof.

        I’ve given an alternative explanation to yours.

        I have previously proven that you are a liar. Hence, nobody is obligated to accept your explanation.

      • I don’t need any proof.

        I gave an alternative explanation to yours.

        I proved that you are a liar. So nobody is obligated to accept your explanation.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I don’t need any proof.

        I have given an alternative explanation to yours.

        Since I have shown that you tell falsehoods, nobody is obligated to accept your explanation.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I don’t need a proof.

        I have an alternative explanation to yours.

        I have shown that you tell falsehoods. So, nobody is obligated to accept your version of the story.

      • I have no need to prove that I cut and pasted the excerpt in question. I have given an alternative explanation to yours. Since I have previously proven that you are a liar, no one is obligated to accept your version of the story.

      • mosquito

        Well, one of us should say something witty. And, it certainly isn’t going to be you. After all, as I have proven previously, you’re a moron. You think that saying that someone pulls his wank is witty. You’ve got the social development of an infant.

      • Nemisis

        See? I win the bet.

      • Your logic is atrocious. You never placed a bet, so you cannot have won it.

      • Nemisis

        Again, you demonstrate your lack of education.

      • You’re a pathological liar.

        I am eminently educated.

        You’ve got nothing and you know it. That is why you never make so much as a feeble attempt to substantiate your crap.

      • I am eminently educated.

        You’ve got nothing and you know it. That is why you never make so much as a feeble attempt to substantiate your crap.

      • I am eminently educated.

        You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate what you spew forth.

      • I am eminently educated.

        You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I am eminently educated.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I am eminently educated.

        You’ve got nothing, as you know very well.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Again, you demonstrate that you are in the chains of the superstition of word magic. I am eminently educated.

      • You’re quite confused. You cannot win a bet which you never placed.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never even attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I explained it very clearly. If you don’t see it, the problem lies in your intellect, not in my communication skills.

      • You’re seriously confused. You’re a danger to yourself and others.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. You raised another one of your straw men. Raising a straw man is a moronic activity, moron.

      • Nemisis

        You think it is easy raising straw men?
        I’m doing this entirely without government assistance.
        You on the other hand a raising a full crop of bullshit on a stick and are using a government grant to get the sticks.
        You’re a bad person. Mean, and…well stinky.
        You actually smell, what the hell have you been eating?

      • mosquito

        I imaging that for you it might be quite difficult to raise straw men. But, you’re a moron in raising that issue, since it is totally irrelevant to the issue at hand.

        You’re hopelessly addicted to making bald, unsubstantiated assertions. That’s how stupid you are.

      • Nemisis

        You do realize that…nah, no you don’t.
        Your not who you claim to be.
        You are not JDM.

      • You’ve got nothing for reasons previoiusly explained.

        I proved that I am JDM. So, it is an established fact that I am JDM, despite your moronic, empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertion to the contrary.

        You know that your assertions are bald. That is why you never attempt to substantiate them.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your garbage.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make so much as a feeble attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons which I have previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know for sure.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any one of your posts.

      • Once again, you’ve confirmed that you’re chained to the superstition of word magic.

      • I imagine for you it might be extremely difficult.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I imagine it could be very difficult for you.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • I am sure that it is quite difficult for you to raise a straw man. Anyone with half of a brain could do it in a few seconds or less.

        Once again, you’ve demonstrated definitively that you’re enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never even attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        If you truly don’t see the evidence, then you are completely devoid of discernment.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve demonstrated once again that you are mentally deficient. You’ve raised another straw man.

      • You’re quite a moron. You cannot “confirm the unverifiable claims”.

        Are illogical fallacies in contrast to logical fallacies?

        You’re full of crap. One does not lose a debate simply because he committed a logical fallacy.

        If your best friend Socrates said about me “your are an idiot …”, then your best friend Socrates is a moron like you.

        I don’t believe that by repeating something several times it makes it true. I have never acted as if I believed that. I have established something and then repeated it whenever it was useful to use it. After all, that is one of the reasons why one proves a statement; so that they can use it subsequently in subsequent arguments.

        Your statement about morons is totally irrelevant to me since I am not a moron. Rather, I am a man of an eminent reputation regarding my keen intellect.

      • This is nonsense. You have seen abundant evidence that I am eminently gifted in constructing irrefutable logical arguments.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        That’s nonsense. I have not used any facts not in invidence.

        There is no evidence to conclude that I have no skill in debate at all.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • The fact that my proofs are proofs is in evidence. Each of the proofs is evidence that it is a proof. A proof bears all the marks of a proof and nothing else does. My debating in this thread is abundant evidence that I am eminently skilled at debating.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • You have not got a clue about debate. You have not scored a point in this debate since all your assertions have been unsubstantiated. I, on the other hand, have proved all my assertions, scoring several points. So, you are not even close to me. I definitely have consummate control over debating.

      • You have scored zero points in this debate, since all of your assertions are unsubstantiated. I have proven all of my assertions and, hence, have scored several points. So, you’re not even close to me. This proves that I’m quite knowledgeable about debate. You’re enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        wrong again nude streaker–
        Im not debating; Im enjoying abusing you and your extremely limited vocabulary
        ====================================== and I willing to wager that U cannot solve my math baseball problem,,, even as U need these days to obfuscate enough 2 attempt to find the answer
        =======================================
        I made it up; it is ” eminently” accurate and NO ONE has ever solved it
        to quote baseball parlance………….
        ” JOHN,,,,,,,uuuuuuuuuur UP”!

      • mosquito

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I proved that you are debating. So, that’s an established fact, despite your bald, unsubstantiated assertion to the contrary.

        Like I said, you have no proof that I cannot solve your math baseball problem. Don’t hold your breath. I’m not going to attempt to solve it. I have no interest in it whatsoever.

      • Since, as I have proven, you are a moron, all of your posts are worthless. The opinions of a moron bear no weight whatsoever.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        they bear enough weight to have such a logical well rounded ( see: waistline) cretin such as U continue to respond with such vecordious querimonies.
        or,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, is this not transpiring on a seemingly minute-by-minute basis?

      • Your logic is atrocious. My responding to your posts does not imply, by any stretch of the imagination, that they have any weight whatsoever. Your obviously thinking that they have weight because of my responding to them demonstrates what a moron you are.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        actually ,,,it demonstrates what a moron YOU are
        =======================================
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, about your inability to conquer the baseball equation I presented to you—

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded. Everything which I have written in this thread demonstrates that I am eminently intelligent. Since you are a moron, a fraud, and a liar, as I have previously proven, your opinion to the contrary is worthless and untrustworthy. That’s an established fact, moron.

        You’re a moron. You have no proof that I am unable to conquer your baseball equation. All you have is a moronic, bald, unsubstantiated assertion that I am. In other words, all you have is nothing.

      • Nemisis

        now you are just recycling

        running out of new spew

      • mosquito

        Repetition is a well known pedagogical tool. And, when dealing with a moron like you, it may be necessary to repeat ad infinitum, which of course is impossible, but very likely necessary.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong, it is well known as Argumentum ad nauseam.
        Which is also commonly referred to as flawed reasoning or a logical fallacy, In the debating world it is called intellectually dishonest.

        Pedagogical, is a useful tool for teaching. IE: repetition learning.
        Your use of the word has no practical application in debate or in proving a fact.
        It’s most common use outside of a educational environment is as a “brain washing” technique.
        Since you are no longer allowed to teach or instruct, your obvious use is the latter. However you lack the skill to properly use the technique in any environment. Which may have directly led to your clothing optional lecture.

      • mosquito

        You should not venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic. According to you, repeating a chorus to a song is Argumentum ad nauseam. Or when a teacher repeats an equation several times in a lecture, he is involved in Argumentum ad nauseam. My God, it must be difficult trying to function without a brain.

        You’re a pathological liar. No restriction has been placed on me concerning teaching. You’re making this stuff up as you go along. Which makes you a bold faced liar.

      • Nemisis

        You are not signing.
        You are not teaching.
        You are not debating.
        You are pretending to debate.
        You are sucking at everything you claim to be great at.
        I am not convinced you are mccarthy.
        I am convinced you are someone near mccarthy.
        If you are mccarthy. Update your faculty page at MSU.
        Include a reference to disquss and your moniker.
        That will be more convincing than just being the guy that answers the phone at a university department.
        That is probably who you are. Just the schmuck answering the phones.

        The Little McCarthy’s Monkey. Forced to answer the phones and clean his socks. The very socks that nutter wore while flapping his pecker at the students ranting about chickens and how best to choke them.
        That’s you…ain’t it….That would make you a toady.
        Since you dance like a little monkey for me, that makes you a Monkey Toady. Or, a Toady Monkey. Either way, jump and dance.

      • You’ve got nothing for reasons previously explained.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You have got absolutely nothing, as you know, to your chagrin.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • Once again, you’ve proven that you are pathetically addicted to word magic.

      • Nemisis

        My father’s family name

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        optional clothing????
        Hmmmmm,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        faculty and police viewed it differently on oct 1 2012
        =========================================
        but I love your subtext above!!!!!
        stay tuned; this jihn McCarthy sans clothing is “special”…………….. do U like my avatar of his arrest?

      • Nemisis

        Clothing optional lecture is a milder version of maniacal penis wielding rant.

      • You’ve got nothing as previously explained.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • Once again, you’ve shown that your position is thoroughly bankrupt. All that you can do is wave your magic wand of word magic. The fact that you believe that that does something demonstrates that you’re certifiably insane.

      • mosquito

        There you go moronically constructing a straw man again.

        I was never arrested as is made clear by at least one of the on-line articles about my breakdown.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know. That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • This is nonsense. By your fallacious logic, singing the repeated chorus to a song is Argumentum ad nauseam. by your fallacious logic, repeating an equation over and over in a lecture where the equation is used several times is Argumentum ad nauseum. Don’t venture into mathematics. You have not got a clue what you are talking about.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your last post is stupid. According to you, repeating an equation in a lecture several times, one for each time that the equation is used, is committing Argumentum ad nauseam. That’s quite a stupid position you have.

      • This is complete nonsense. According to you, if an instructor uses an equation several times to solve several problems, then he is engaged in the error of Argumentum ad nauseum. So, you’re not logical; you’re just plain stupid.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know. That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate what you post.

      • Using an old argument for a new purpose is not recycling, any more than driving my car day after day is recycling.

      • Stephen Barlow

        Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.,,

      • Nemisis

        How much weight do they have?
        It has been suggested that the data on the internet has actual weight. Since data is made up of electrons and electrons have weight. I’ll bet a competent math magician could construct an equation that would give everyone an answer to; “How much weight does a response by Mosquito have?”

      • mosquito

        gian keys’ posts do not have any weight. Since he is a moron, like you, his posts are worthless.

        Don’t venture into mathematics. You don’t have a clue about mathematics. Equations don’t produce numbers.

      • Nemisis

        “Equations don’t produce numbers.”

        I’m the one with no idea about mathematics.

        Tell the world what do equations produce?

      • mosquito

        You’re incredibly arrogant. Do you really think that you’re going to contradict a renowned mathematician about a mathematical fact? Yes, you have no idea about mathematics. Equations don’t produce anything. Equations are statements. An equation is a statement that two things are equal. That’s why it is called an equation, it equates two things.

      • Nemisis

        a number is a thing
        a thing is an idea a concept an activity mob related but not limited to these constraints
        to be simplistic 2=1+1 is an equation and looky there pesky numbers
        we could use algebra and say a=((a*.5)+(a*.5)) or words and say two is equal to one plus one yet no matter how you describe this equation there are but two conclusions and one of them is that there are numbers
        equations are rarely word related as in port is not equal to dock but may be equal to dock plus dock yet port is equal to left while left does not always equal port and not all ports are ships though most ports are for docking
        like i said you have word problems
        I will contradict anyone who is as wrong as you are as i just did and i do not even have to call you a moron or an idiot as that conclusion is up to the reader i dare not due to arrogance i dare because you are simple and wrong two conditions you achieve quite often
        like having to parse grammar i bet not must be maddening
        your grasp of the conversation flow is ludicrous just because you claim to be a mathematician does not mean all the conversations are going to be about mathematics not all word problems are related to math that is your conceit clouding your ability to extrapolate meaning from context you being an unverified mathematical nudist is really of no matter to the fact that you have word problems

      • There is nothing in your mind but bullshit. This last post is more bullshit. You’re a bullshit artist. Stop treating us disrespectfully by trying to pass off your bullshit as something of substance.

        In particular, you are full of crap when you say that a certain equation has only two conclusions. That’s sheer bullshit from your brain full of bullshit. Any statement has infinitely many conclusions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        This is sheer nonsense. For instance, your claim that a certain equation has only two conclusions, is sheer nonsense. Any assertion has infinitely many conclusions. Your making your stuff up as you go along. That is why you never substantiate it.

      • This is sheer nonsense. For instance, your claim that a certain equation
        has only two conclusions, is sheer nonsense. Any assertion has
        infinitely many conclusions. You’re making your stuff up as you go along.
        That is why you never substantiate it.

      • This is sheer nonsense. You’re very ill mentally.

      • Equations don’t produce numbers. Equations are statements. Statements don’t produce anything.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Equations don’t produce anything. Equations are statements. They are statements that say that one thing is equal to another thing. So, like all statements, they don’t produce anything.

      • An equation is a statement, a statement that two things are equal. Hence, as with all statements, it does not produce anything.

        Yes, that’s right, you’re the one who has not got a clue about mathematics. You just spew forth whatever nonsense springs into your vacant mind and hope that no one notices that it’s complete and utter gibberish.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        duuuude,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        Im so marrying you!
        ===============================
        double pronged attack!

      • mosquito

        You don’t have a single pronged attack. Your attacks are moronic, they are prongless.

      • You don’t even have a single pronged attack. Your posts are prong-less.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know all too well.

        That is why you have never once substantiated one of your assertions in response to me.

      • You are an incredibly poor student. The answer to your question is a number. I’ve already taught you that equations don’t produce numbers. Yet, here you are talking about an equation that will produce a number. It’s hopeless for you. You’re doomed to failure. You’re too infatuated with your own moronic thoughts to become educated by the thoughts of people with intelligence.

      • You wrote: “really john? really??? having a tough time with humor today? really john???”

        You are truly a moron. You actually believe that that sort of transparent posturing advances your case. It doesn’t. It just demonstrates how pathetic is your position.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        would U logically concur that sitting naked while handcuffed in the hallway(s) of where U “work” and then getting photographed next to the police who handcuffed you constitute a pathetic position of ‘posturing’?
        ——————–or; is that socially and spiritually UPLIFITING in your myopic logical book of case advancement?
        ***********************************************************
        let u s know john,..,,,,,,, let us know

      • That’s a moronic question: “would U logically concur”.

        Whether something is logical or not has nothing whatsoever to do with what anyone would do. The fact that you obviously think it does, by this moronic question, demonstrates how moronic you are.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        u seriously have a tough time with the illogical concept of satire
        ======================================
        the good news? U can enjoy satire even when handcuffed–totally insane– in a MSU hallway with students taking photos of your ostensible breakdown
        >quite the dignified posture for a ” winner”; EH john?

      • Why do you continue to insist on proving that you are a moron? The construction of straw men is a moronic activity.

        Stating bald, unsubstantiated assertions is also a moronic activity.

        You keep repeating both of these moronic activities, thereby proving, over and over again, that you are a moron.

      • Nemisis

        I’ve been saying it all along. He has word problems.

      • mosquito

        Once again, you’ve proven that you’re a moron.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        he is amazing,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, truly– amazing!!
        =====================================
        have U kept up with his loose cannon dialogue with me?
        he is precious!
        =====================================
        and,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        >>>>>> ALL MINE <<<<<<<<

      • mosquito

        In all of your posts in response to me, you have yet to contribute anything to our discussion. Everything that you have written is banal and empty.

      • mosquito

        Sure, you’ve been saying it. But that’s not saying anything. Bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you clearly know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate your posts.

      • So what, you’ve said a lot of things. But all of it has been thrown in the trash bin, since it was all unsubstantiated. You’re addicted to word magic.

      • mosquito

        Satire is not illogical, moron. And I have no problem with satire. If you really believe that your drivel is satire, then you are more moronic than I thought you were.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        doing your fred Astaire dance away from the topic is very illogical john–
        now- shall we review your nude escapade for all to enjoy as much as you did??

      • mosquito

        You’re quite illogical. You’re addicted to raising straw men. Doing that is doing something illogical.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you clearly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You cannot place “love me being your fave moron” after donnnnchu?????/

        You’ve got nothing. Give it up. You’re wasting everyone’s time, including your own, by these banal posts of yours.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        actually, im wasting YOUR time
        ===============================
        which reminds me–
        looking at your turdiform shape in the photo of U handcuffed and naked at your job——–
        I must post:
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        ” a waist is a terrible thing to mind”
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        ….honoring your corpulent tummie of course…

      • Actually, you’re wasting the time of every reader of this thread.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        <<<<<<<>>>>>>>>
        ======================================
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, about your mathematical IN-ability to figure out my baseball query……….

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. The fact that I respond to your post does not in any way, shape, or form imply that you are not wasting my time. The fact that you think that it does demonstrates what a moron you are.

        You have no proof that I am unable to figure out your baseball query. All that you have is a moronic, empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertion that I am. In other words, you’ve got nothing.

      • Nemisis

        He already stated that he indeed is wasting your time.

        “The fact that I respond to your post does not in any way, shape, or form imply that you are not wasting my time.”

        Why are you arguing that which is stated?

        “except yours I see; based upon your inane proclivity to reply ” The subject is clearly the time wasted and clearly your time.

      • mosquito

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. gian keys was claiming that my time was not being wasted. I was challenging that assertion, moron.

      • Nemisis

        know JMNA directly said that he was wasting your time
        your challenge like your career fell flat

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious. gian keys was claiming that my
        time was not being wasted. I was challenging that assertion, moron.

      • mosquito

        “know JMNA directly said …” Were you attempting to contradict me? Note that you did not put know in quotes. So, don’t try to backpeddle you lying cheat.

        Nothing fell flat about my career or my challenge. What I said about gian keys is correct, despite your moronic, empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertion to the contrary.

      • Nemisis

        note that you think i was quoting youre grand fail of know and no
        that is a sign of conceit
        it does indicate due to your post that i have once again successfully baited a comment from your ass
        such an easy task to accomplish
        pity that the side game was closed i could have used that money to donate this weekend oh well i guess some kid gets used crutches instead of new ones

        funny though you mention nothing of other punctuation or capitalization ill chalk that up to an attempt to not be baited on it which is exactly what you were being baited on your inability to control yourself were grammar is involved

        i will rewrite a portion of the sentence.

        “Know, JMNA directly said that he was wasting your time…”

        Oh my that does change things still think I was referring to your know fail perhaps it is more clear now that I was informing you

      • mosquito

        You’re totally full of shit. You’re a pathological liar. This is just sheer shameless backpeddling on your part.

        You have not baited anyone. Saying you have is just your pathetic attempt to save face.

        Your logic is atrocious. My criticizing your moronic errors is no sign of my being baited. You are must making a moronic, empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertion that it is.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong. Your new nickname is Dr. Wrong.
        Your are an idiot if you think you are correct any person, with a complete brain would confirm this if you would just ask.

        Here, prove it to yourself.
        Walk up to any person and ask them if you are wrong.

        If they tell you that you are right, then you know they only have half a brain, and you should then ask another person.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons previously laid out.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You wrote: “Your are”. What the hell does that mean?”.

        You wrote: “Your are an idiot if you think you are correct any person,”. Could you butcher the English language a little more? You have not destroyed it yet.

      • Once again, you’ve established that you are hopelessly entangled in the superstition of word magic.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know for sure.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You wrote: “youre grand fail of know and no”. If you’re going to try to make someone look stupid, then make sure that your stupid isn’t showing: “youre”. There is no such word as “youre”.

        You wrote: “your inability to control yourself were grammar is involved”. What the hell does that mean?

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I have already explained why the fact that gian keys said elsewhere that he was wasting my time is irrelevant to my interchange with him about when he implied that he was not wasting my time. His being inconsistent does not imply that he did not do both of these things.

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded. I already dispensed with your comments about gian keys. Your reading comprehension is atrocious.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        gian keys definitely implied that he was not wasting my time when he argued that my responding to one of his posts demonstrated that my time was not being wasted. It is totally irrelevant whether he was inconsistent about this and said elsewhere that he was wasting my time. The fact that you think that that is relevant demonstrates what an atrocious hold you have upon logic.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • I have already dispensed with this straw man. The raising of a straw man is a moronic activity, a complete waste of time.

      • gian keys wrote: “except yours I see; based upon your inane proclivity to reply”. He was saying that my time was not being wasted because I replied. He apparently believe the nonsensical conclusion that if someone takes the time to reply, his time is not being wasted. That’s why I responded: “The fact that I respond to your post does not in any way, shape, or form imply that you are not wasting my time.” Whatever gian keys said elsewhere is irrelevant to this interchange.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        gian keys definitely implies that he was not wasting my time when he implied that my responding to him indicated that I was not wasting my time. The fact that he was inconsistent about this and elsewhere said that he was wasting my time is totally irrelevant. The fact that you think that it is relevant demonstrates what an abysmal hold you have upon logic.

      • I have already dispensed with this straw man. Your remarks here are totally irrelevant to my comments about gian keys.

      • I have already dispensed with this straw man. It has nothing whatsoever to do with my comments about gian keys.

      • Nemisis

        Dude can’t even complete his own equation.

      • mosquito

        Bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

      • Nemisis

        you said it toady mcmonkey

      • You’ve got nothing as previously explained.

      • Nemisis

        ive got sunshine on a cloudy day

      • mosquito

        No, you’ve got nothing, period. You’re totally bankrupt. You don’t even have sunshine on a cloudy day. Just because there is a piece of cake on a table, it doesn’t mean that you have it. Your logic is atrocious, moron.

      • No, you don’t have sunshine on a cloudy day. You’ve got nothing. Just because there is a sandwich on the table does not imply that it is yours.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You have not got sunshine on a cloudy day. You’ve got nothing. Just because there is a pie on the table, does not mean that it belongs to you.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • You have not got sunshine on a cloudy day.

        Just because there is a sandwich on the table does not mean that it is yours.

      • You’re a pathetically childish individual.

      • You’ve got nothing as you well know. That is why you never attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • You cannot prove that I can’t complete your equation. You are just mindlessly claiming that I can’t. Again, you’re addicted to word magic.

      • You have no proof that I can’t complete your equation. You are just mindlessly asserting that I can’t. You’re addicted to word magic.

      • Stephen Barlow

        Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.,,,,

      • Stephen Barlow

        Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion..,

      • Stephen Barlow

        ,.,Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.

      • Stephen Barlow

        ,.,.Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.

      • Stephen Barlow

        Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.,.,

      • You’ve got nothing for reasons previously explained.

      • You have no proof that I am unable to figure out your baseball query. You are just making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion that I am unable to do this. In other words, you have nothing.

      • Nemisis

        Not mine. Therefore your logic has failed you again.

      • mosquito

        No, your logic has failed you again. Oh, I’m sorry, strictly speaking that’s not correct. After all, you don’t have any logic. You’re a moron. You are definitely wasting your own time.

      • Nemisis

        No, you clearly stated JMNA was wasting my time.
        Are you saying that I have more time than others?
        That is a neat trick. If we allow for your logic to stand, that would make me a time lord. So either I am a time lord or you are wrong.
        Since I do not have a TARDIS, nor a robotic dog, I propose that I am not a time lord, and that you are incorrect to accuse me of this.

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. Saying that someone is wasting your time in no way implies that you have more time than others. The fact that you think that it does demonstrates what a moron you are.

      • Nemisis

        two people can not separately waste the same time

      • You’re a moron moronically constructing a straw man.

      • Guest

        You’re a moron moronically raising a straw man.

      • Nemisis

        wrong

      • mosquito

        Every single one of your posts in response to me has been wrong. All of my posts in response to you have been right. You lost this debate a long time ago. Don’t bother telling me you’re not debating. That’s bullshit.

      • Nemisis

        gnorW

      • mosquito

        Why are you so devoted to proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re hopelessly childish.

      • You’re hopelessly childish.

      • You’ve got nothing and you know it. That’s why you never even make a feeble attempt at substantiating your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • Once again, you’ve proven that you’re addicted to the superstition of word magic.

      • Nemisis

        hahahaha forget to sign in didja

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most undoubtedly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • You’re hopelessly childish.

      • Don’t venture into logic. You just raised a straw man. Raising a straw man is a moronic activity.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Nonsense, two people can definitely waste the same time. Let two people sit down on a couch from 12:00 p.m. until 1:00 p.m. today, doing nothing. Then, they will have both wasted the same time, the time from 12:00 p.m. until 1:00 p.m. today.

      • This is patently false. Let two people sit down on a bench from 11:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m., doing nothing. Then, by 12:00 p.m., they will have both wasted the same time, the time from 11:00 p.m. until 12:00 p.m.. You are one sick puppy. You can’t help but lie.

      • Your logic is atrocious. A implies B does not imply B implies A. Don’t venture into logic. You have not a clue about logic.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your argument is stupid. A implies B does not imply that B implies A.

      • Once again, you’ve proven yourself to be thoroughly illogical. Your premise does not imply your conclusion.

      • You are definitely wasting your time.

      • No, gian keys is definitely wasting your time. But that’s irrelevant to my claim. After all, you’re not a reader of this thread. It’s abundantly clear that you are not reading this thread. There’s no way that anyone could read this thread and come away so confused about what is written here as are you.

      • gian keys is also wasting your time. There’s nothing wrong with my logic.

      • Stephen Barlow

        Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.,,,

      • mosquito

        You write: “really john? really??? having a tough time with humor today? really john???” You’re quite the moron. You really believe that this transparent posturing represents a victory for you. All that it has done is give you an opportunity to prove that you are a jackass.

      • mosquito

        You realize that I’m not just saying that you are a moron. I proved that you are a moron. So, when I say that you are a moron, I’m saying something that is an established fact. Get it, moron.

      • That’s irrelevant.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you surely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your opinions.

      • This is irrelevant.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        This is irrelevant.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        This is irrelevant.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        That is irrelevant.

      • This is totally irrelevant to the issue at hand.

      • This is irrelevant.

      • This post is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

      • Nemisis

        Now we “No” you do not love being your favorite moron.
        That is your first part of your argument. Therefore the most important. Your second statement is demon-strative that you feel you are below moron status.
        I think you are too hard on yourself.
        Certainly you have attained moron status.

        Why do you not love being your favorite moron?
        I think you are a very capable moron worthy of being anyone’s favorite.

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. Saying that I am not even a moron does not imply that I am below moron status. It is a well known rhetorical way of emphasizing that I am not a moron. For example, “don’t even think of eating that last piece of cake” does not mean that you’re supposed to eat less than that piece of cake. It just means that you’re not supposed to eat that piece of cake.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong, it means; “Do not think about eating the cake.”
        One could eat the cake without thinking about eating the cake and still fall within the guidelines set by the statement.

        You are not good at this.

        Your statement was ambiguous. As the reader I chose the meaning of your statement. You should be more concise. This lack of discipline on your part is troublesome. You may want to seek medical advice. I am sensing dementia in your comments.

      • mosquito

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I did not say what “don’t think of eating that last piece of cake” means. I said what it does not mean. And, what I said that it does not mean, it most definitely does not mean.

        It must be very difficult to function without a brain.

        I am very good at this. You, on the other hand, have not got a clue about how to construct a valid argument. You have proven this fact repeatedly in this thread.

        You’ve got nothing, for reasons previously laid out.

      • Nemisis

        no you did not say what it does not mean you left the interpretation to the reader i chose to derive that the cake may be eaten if one simply chooses to not think about eating the cake

        “I said what it does not mean. And, what I said that it does not mean, it most definitely does not mean.” is this your best example of a valid argument a flawed statement about a flawed example of directive meaning

        you did not it does not you failed to exclude open interpretation therefore it was open for interpretation this is all on you your poor use of language your poor ability to convey your ideas such as they are is indicative of your fail

      • You reading comprehension is atrocious, moron. I explicitly said what it does not mean: “For example, “don’t even think of eating that last piece of cake” does
        not mean that you’re supposed to eat less than that piece of cake.”

        You’re full of crap. The statement you quote is not a flawed statement. It is a valid statement.

        You’ve got nothing for reasons previously explained.

      • Nemisis

        Where do you get “less than” from?
        If one were to eat “less than the last piece” of cake there would still be cake left. You have AADD?

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. You’ve once again played the moronic game of raising a straw man. My God, you are pathetically bereft of a functioning brain.

        You’re the one that said the statement in question implied something about less than, not me, moron.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite the moron. I don’t need to get less than from anywhere. Nothing is less than a piece of cake. I don’t need to go anywhere to get nothing. I can just wait for your next post.

      • Nothing is less than the last piece of cake. I don’t need to get nothing. I can just wait for your next post.

      • mosquito

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious, moron. I explicitly said what it does not mean: “For example, “don’t even think of eating that last piece of cake” does
        not mean that you’re supposed to eat less than that piece of cake.”

        You’re full of crap. The statement you quote is not a flawed statement. It is a valid statement.

        You’ve got nothing for reasons previously explained.

      • Nemisis

        how many times are you going to reply to the same comment

        you fail to understand that if someone does not think about eating the last piece of cake they could actually eat the last piece and still be in compliance any competent logician would agree that any further rebuttal would only be made by an idiot
        try to follow along here it is really just a state of mind do you think about every breath you take no you do not unless your running out of air then saying something like do not even think about taking the last breath of air would conceivably cause someone to think about that last breath and inadvertently take the breath or deliberately take the breath just live only slightly longer cake on the other hand is not as critical a need as air and eating can be done while not concentrating greatly upon the act of eating which has led to some fairly tasty delicacies so one could consume the cake and not think about it at all since the instruction was to not even think about eating the cake the compliance is held intact had you said do not eat the last piece of cake do not even think about eating the last piece of cake you would still have your last piece of cake you did not say that and the result is you do not have your last piece of theoretical cake i however have rather enjoyed in theory the last piece of cake and since i do not care to adhere to instruction set forth by you i pondered what the best way to eat the last piece of cake would be i envision a single microscopic robot carefully atom by atom dismantling the cake and reconstructing the cake atoms upon a fork when the reassembled cake atoms reach approximately one third of a gram i like mixing my units of measure it is infinitely more fun the fork being made to levitate by magic gifted to me by my father satan then escorts the one third gram of cake to my mouth where i then consume the last piece of cake expressly forbade to think about eating the process repeats to the last bite is taken leaving only the icing standing in a strange cakeless manner which i then melt with a laser and inhale the fumes
        thereby completing the task of eating the last piece of cake and its icing if i was in a truly malicious mood i would eat only the icing and put the cake in a microwave for a full minute on high and the just leave it for you to consume trouble there is i like cake and i already told you what i am doing i do without malice and if i did then so what butter cup do you need a tissue do you know what a waa is do you know how to make a waa a waa is made by waa fucking waa do you know what a waambulance is do you need one i think you do

        now lets look at your statement

        dont even think about eating that last piece of cake does not mean youre supposed to eat less than that piece of cake
        to that i say how fucking retarded are you
        how does one eat less than that piece of cake
        when did cake get an appetite
        what do cakes eat
        how much do cakes eat on average
        is that cake on a diet or a binge
        do other pieces think that piece eats too much or too little
        is that piece of cake from a bakery or is it homemade
        there are just so many variables
        perhaps you could explain to us using mathematics how a piece of cake would consume more than a person being a mathematical fucking genius you should be able to whip up a formula that could explain it should be a piece of cake to do so pardon the pun perhaps you would like a piece of pi to start you off come on cartographer you can do this

      • mosquito

        Once again, you have proven that you are a moron by raising a straw man.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        Everyone knows only an idiot would reply to this post.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Everyone of even modest intelligence knows that only an idiot would post “Everyone knows only an idiot would reply to this post.”. This, for instance, is an intelligent response to that idiotic post.

      • This is a patently false statement. There are plenty of people who know nothing at all about this post. So, those people could not possibly know that only an idiot would reply to it. You’re a bullshit artist.

      • No, I definitely explicitly said what it does not mean.

      • You entirely missed my point. I did not say what “Do not think about eating the cake.” means. I said what it does not mean. I said that it does not mean that you should eat less cake, as you suggested it means.

      • I’ve already dispensed with this straw man. The issue is not about what the statement means. The issue is about what the statement does not mean.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        duuuude,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, that’s so priceless that his majesty has not replied!!
        ==================================
        “im not even a moron”

      • Nemisis

        Wait for it.
        He is about to get real special treatment.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, which you definitely know. That is why you have not even once attempted to substantiate your moronic posts.

      • Nemisis

        wrong

      • You’ve got nothing, which you definitely know. That is why you have not even once attempted to substantiate your moronic posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never substantiated your posts.

      • You write: “I’m not even a moron” as if that is something ridiculous. From the context, it clearly is intended to communicate: “I’m not even a moron, never mind my favorite moron.” Your reading comprehension is atrocious.

      • Your logic is atrocious. Your premises never imply your conclusions.

      • Nemisis

        Steve, I am often in the state of not being blindfolded. I can not remember the last time I was blindfolded. That may or may not be due to drug induced memory loss.
        Anyway, my question is; How do you know?

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        glenn beck and rush limp-baugh told him…………….. they did an expose on this using VERY willing ( see: no sexual partners) Anne Coulter and Michelle “no tits & hates life” Malkin
        =====================================
        but– whom was blindfolded in that menagerie?

      • mosquito

        Thanks for saving me the trouble of proving that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        what do YOU call a paid college ( Michigan state university) teacher who goes berserk by screaming and smashing himself against windows(ETC) and then strips NUDE in front of his students and is eventually incarcerated (see: handcuffed by POLICE) and photographed NUDE in a campus hallway ; then led away by police to a hospital for a much needed observation?
        (a) logical
        (b) eminent
        (c) assertive ( I like this one)
        (d) delusional
        (e) socially bereft of any skills -socially-
        (f) jiohn Mccarthy on October 1 2012
        (g) one serious party animal!!
        (h) NOT a MORON
        ****************************************************
        vote now for a free 2nd cup of coffee!

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Steve Brains

        BDSM

      • Steve Brains

        YOur vision problems are obvious to the blind.

      • Nemisis

        What’s poker got to do with this?

        Nvm, just kidding. Smile. No really smile.
        Okay stop smiling that shit is creepy.

      • mosquito

        Your position is bankrupt, which you obviously know. That’s why you have never made even a feeble attempt at substantiating the nonsense which you spew forth.

  • RBurton

    Every day in the USA, an average of 289 people get shot by a gun and 86 of those die. Where’s the outrage about that?

    • And nearly 0% of them even swap spit. I agree.

    • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

      that’s because its very ”American” to die from gunfire- especially an AMERICAN gun ( see: john wayne / clint eastwood/ Charles Bronson / etc) whereas EBOLA not only isn’t American,,,,,,,its not even European: its AFRICAN!!!

      • mosquito

        You may have changed your moniker, but you’re still Steve Shit-for-brains.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        i though U might be flattered with the name and photo!!!
        all in your ” honor” of course–
        ,,,,,and YES: I will be letting EVVVVVVERYONE know the story and how to find all the “logically legal” details-ONLINE– including that nice pic of your somewhat smallish yet OVERWEIGHT nude self being entertained by police while U warming those shiny handcuffs….. and those cute socks
        ========================================
        lets continue; shall we?? “logically” of course—

      • it’s good to see you revealing yourself to be the ignorant bigot that you are.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing as you obviously know. That is why you have never, not even once, attempted to substantiate your drivel.

      • Nemisis

        Mosquito’s take on Mosquito.

        “mosquito

        mosquito

        8 days ago

        Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic as is
        demonstrated by your repeated failure with logic in this thread. You
        have yet to write a conditional statement in which the premise implies
        the conclusion. It really is quite a pathetic thing to watch, you trying
        to construct a logical argument.”

      • mosquito

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. Everyone following this thread knows that I was addressing you in the above quote from me, not me. I could not possibly be addressing me, since my logic in this thread has been impeccable.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        star treks MR SPOCK just vanished from this existence after attempting the VULCAN ” mind meld” with the occasionally publicly NUDE John Mccarthy
        ===========================================
        im now bring in MR DATA

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, for reasons previously explained.

      • Guest

        Assuming that Spock ever exists, he won’t be alive until the 22nd century. Hence, your story is impossible.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons previously laid out.

      • Vulcans are averse to performing mind melds with an unwilling partner. So, this story is clearly fabricated.

      • mosquito

        This quote from me was posted to my account but was obviously not addressed to me. It cannot be addressed to me since my posts in this thread have all been eminently logical, as any competent logician will confirm.

      • Nemisis

        Don’t worry buttercup I screen shot that shitty little post so you can debate it with everyone else as for myself I don’t need to be convinced.
        I know your a babbling idiot.

        Still you try to claim facts not in evidence as proof of your imaginary status. You still have not proven a single competent logician would agree with you.

      • The screen shot and the neighboring posts confirms what I said. You lost that argument, moron.

        I have not claimed any facts not in evidence. You have nothing for reasons previously described.

        I don’t need to bring forth a single competent logician. I have substantiated my claims regarding my proofs by making a correct claim that competent logicians will confirm that my arguments are proofs. If you want to refute this correct claim, just try, you cowardly sleezeball.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong. Again you fail. The screenshot shows you clearly talking to yourself. All of your claims are facts not in evidence. Your very claim that you have made a proof by claiming is exactly what facts not in evidence are. Like many of your other problems, those “facts” are figments of a deranged mind. There, refuted butter cup.
        Everyone knows only a total incompetent sloppy idoit would reply to this post.

      • Your logic is atrocious. The screen shot shows that the post was posted to my account. It does not imply that I am talking to myself. The fact that you think that it implies that demonstrates what a moron you are.

        The fact that my proof is a proof is in evidence, moron. The proof itself is evidence that it is a proof. A proof bears all the markings of a proof and nothing but a proof does. So, you are full of crap up to the top of your head.

        You believe in word magic. This implies that you are a moron.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        If you’re going to call someone a babbling idiot, then try to make sure that your stupid isn’t showing: “your a babbling idiot”.

      • It is clear from the flow of the thread that I was not addressing me in this post. You’re being quite childish.

    • Nemisis

      I would argue that 289 people are shot by someone else using a gun.

      There is plenty of outrage for that very topic.
      Just not in this outrage for Ebola.
      I am for shooting people that violate an Ebola quarantine.

  • Avatar

    Does anyone remember Fox News in W. Bush years? They practically demanded that Americans must trust in government and their handling of crisis. I’ve seen other article about today’s Fox News’ former operatives, they said the HQ in New York is filled with absolute hostile atmosphere, purely sexist toward women (ladies are banned from wearing pants), and officials are protecting low level workers who harass and using vulgar languages toward non-whites and ladies.

    • GenerallyConfused

      Otherwise you were anti-american..cause Republican president.

    • Steve Brains

      Those ARE some scary archives!!!

    • You wrote: “who harass and using vulgar languages..”. That breaks down into two clauses: “who harass” and “who using vulgar languages”. Man, that’s moronic.

      • Avatar

        Huh? Are you concerning more about my English than what is happening in real world? Now that is real moronic.

      • You’re quite the moron. Your English is happening in the real world. Only a moron, with no appreciation for the beauty of the English language, would regard the paying of attention to matters of the English language as unimportant.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        please pick all that describe thee:
        ********************************************************
        (a) steatopygous
        (b) alopecial
        (c) onanistic ( on a quotidian basis)
        (d) lachrymose
        (e) napiform
        (f) yirning
        (g) smarmy
        (h) >>>>>>>>>>> MY NEW HERO<<<<<<

      • Please pick all that describe you:

        (a) moronic
        (b) infantile
        (c) prurient
        (d) asinine
        (e) an intellectual pygmy
        (f) a blowhard
        (g) a loser
        (h) learning disabled

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        (d)
        TOTALLY!!!

      • You’re a moron. You failed miserably. All of the descriptions apply to you, asshole.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        well; at least U know the descriptions of what you wrote–
        U certainly need help in assimilating my keen observations of you–
        >> may I recommend the bastinado or defenestration to help jar your resipiscence?

      • mosquito

        You are clearly a moron. You actually think that knowing a lot of words is a sign of intelligence. That’s like the people that think that contestants on Jeopardy are super smart. Do you know that there are morons who can multiply two eight digit numbers in a matter of seconds? None of this is any indication whatsoever of intelligence. You’re not intelligent. You’re a loser.

      • Nemisis

        Sorry, he picked up b, d, e, g, and h while failing against me.

      • Why
        are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self
        respect?

      • Nemisis

        Why are you an ass?

      • Why
        are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self
        respect?

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for obvious cut-and-paste, since the troll has nothing else to say*

      • Why
        are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self
        respect?

        Your logic is atrocious. Your premise does not imply your conclusion.

      • Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

        Your logic is atrocious. Your premises do not imply your conclusions.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being a troll who doesn’t realize I don’t give a shit about its “logic” *

      • You’re quite illogical. There is nothing in what I have written in this thread that implies that I don’t realize that you don’t give a shit about logic. (That’s what my logic is, it’s just straightforward logic. Basically, it’s common sense.) You are quite narcissistic. It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether you give a shit about logic. The only thing to be gained from the knowledge that you don’t give a shit about this is that you are an intellectual pygmy, a pathetic excuse for a human being.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being a pathetic trollish twerp*

      • As I have already observed, you’ve got nothing. Does it entertain you to do nothing? If it does, then that speaks volumes about your intelligence.

      • BB-Mystic

        Your nothing entertains me immensely.

        *flagged for being a pompous trollish nothing*

      • mosquito

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious.

      • BB-Mystic

        And?

        *flagged for being an atrocious trollish nothing*

      • You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • As I have previously observed, you have nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • Nemisis

        Oh, wow! Did you just get told you posted that comment before?
        clever little monkey. grab and suck some more.

      • mosquito

        No, I did not just get told that. Why are you so slavishly devoted to proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • Nemisis

        “No, I did not just get told that.”

        Sure.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t ever substantiate any of your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, I did not just get told that.

        You’ve got zero, as you surely know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • Avatar

        I’d bet these guest up votes are from this (moron-as-his-favorite-word) mosquito’s own computer.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        sometimes I upvote trolls just to annoy them
        ======================================
        this guy is just another regressive crybaby troll who thinks sex is “for other people”

      • Give it up, gian keys. You’ve got nothing. For bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to just that, nothing. Why
        are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self
        respect?

      • Please pick all that describe gian keys:
        (a) partisan
        (b) bigot
        (c) moron
        (d) childish
        (e) prurient
        (f) ignorant
        (g) white trash
        (h) illogical

      • Avatar

        Wow, you’re using justification of “perfect English” to make yourself feeling dominate over anyone who doesn’t speak it well. Yeah sure. I’d bet you think you’re having bigger dick than everyone in the same room.

      • mosquito

        The word dominate is a verb. So, how the hell does one end up “feeling dominate”. That’s like saying he was feeling run. Boy, you sure are a moron.

      • Avatar

        Flagged for being ‘moron’.

      • Give it up, Avatar. You’ve got nothing. For bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to just that, nothing. Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        RUN is also a noun
        ==================================
        ” oooops”

      • You’re a moron. You’ve just raised a straw man. Raising a straw man is one of the most basic logical errors. It’s not surprising that you raised one. After all, you’re a moron. It does not matter a hill of beans that run is also a noun. I was obviously using the verb form of run. The noun form of run is totally irrelevant to my post.

      • Nemisis

        How do you “no” ?

      • I know because I’m literate, unlike you.

      • Nemisis

        Watch

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your assertions.

      • I don’t feel dominant over anyone. I’m correcting people for their English errors. The English language is a beautiful thing. We should all be concerned when it is being butchered. If you are not so concerned, that indicates that you are sadly lacking in taste and discernment.

      • Avatar

        English is my friggin third language and I only learned it when I was 9 years old. Oh man, I really don’t care about what you say. Perfect English doesn’t make you the better person than anyone else.

      • Avatar

        LMFAO! I just took short look at your comment history and apparently you LOVED to throw “moron” around on other commenters. I knew it, you love to believe you are having bigger dick than everyone in same room. You’re so delusional and I was beginning to appreciate you but I wouldn’t want to stoop myself to low level of humanity like you, dickhead.

      • mosquito

        No, I don’t love to believe that I have a bigger dick than everyone in the same room. I’m not fixated on the male member like you obviously are. And I am certainly not delusional or a dickhead. You are obviously big on making bald, unsubstantiated assertions. Since you do this, you are obviously not intelligent enough to know that doing this is a complete waste of time for everyone who reads these assertions, including yourself. All such assertions are illegitimate and excluded from any intelligent conversation. Why is that? Because, if we allow people to make such assertions, then anyone can assert anything, which inevitably leads to moronic conversations, the kind of conversations you prefer.

      • Avatar

        ‘Inevitable’ is too big for a word for ‘moron’ like you.

      • Give it up, Avatar. Your position is totally bankrupt. You have absolutely nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing. Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        are U alopecial? U seem to have an ongoing torrid love affair with “BALD”
        ========================================

      • mosquito

        You’re quite illogical. Nothing which I have written in this thread could possibly lead you to such an impression.

      • Would you please butcher the English language a bit more? You have not yet destroyed it.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        the GREAT–and late– William F Buckley once noted that within any expostulation ANY participant IN that symposium who is seen using the SAME word over & over (SEE: assertions/assert) in a short time is not only apogenous as a ‘speaker’/writer but his argument(Q.V.) is a contraindicated showcasing of dittography —-
        I remain on YOUR side here as U are NOT delusional:
        “delusional” would fiercely imply spontaneity of sapid and lucid thought-

      • You’re full of crap. It doesn’t matter a hill of beans what William F. Buckley said.

      • Nemisis

        Nope, you are wrong again. Buckley is very germane, not so much in what he said but how he said what he said.

        I am a bit amused by Buckley being quoted in this comment forum.

        Good show GK.

      • No, Buckly is irrelevant to this discussion. If you don’t understand that, then I have to conclude that you don’t know what the term irrelevant means with regards to a logical discussion. That would not be surprising. After all, you’re a moron. You’re also clearly a partisan bigot.

      • Nemisis

        Nope, Buckley remains. Your comments are proof enough that he should remain. Have you “Know” idea why?

      • You’re quite the moron. My comments prove no such thing. Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • Nemisis

        Your comments prove nothing except your aptitude for grabbing the big one and sucking hard.

      • mosquito

        No, my comments prove that I am eminently logical and you have not got a clue about logic.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        The depth of your childishness knows no bottom.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        duuuuude————– I love having you ( and others ) castrating this impotent ultracrepidarian!!

      • You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong on all counts, again.

      • No, I’ve have been right about every assertion which I have made in this thread, as verified by my proofs of these assertions.

      • Nemisis

        I checked the records, and they clearly reflect your wrongness.

      • mosquito

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. The records confirm that I have proven you to be wrong in every single one of your responses to me.

      • Nemisis

        How would you know? You did not check the records. The records all clearly state you suck, you’re wrong, and you’re not McCarthy.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t ever substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re making this stuff up as you go along.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • You’re a pathological liar. You did no such thing and the record proves that my arguments are all proofs.

      • Your position is bankrupt. You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • Nemisis

        See, that’s just it. You are still wrong.

      • mosquito

        No, I am right as I have been throughout this entire thread. As I have explained repeatedly, you’ve got nothing. Give it up. You’re wasting the time of everyone following this thread, including the time of yourself.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        “repeatedly”
        Hmmmmmm,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, shall I list the sophomoric ( and limited) words U have memorized?
        I like MORON beeeeeeeeeeecauz im a moron!
        =======================================
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, about your napiform shape–

      • Nemisis

        How I choose to spend my time is of no concern of yours.
        I decide when and what I do with my time.
        No one has been forced to read this thread, it is a choice they make.
        If they are following this thread then they have decided that the time spent is not wasted.

        That you feel discussing anything with you is a waste of time says more about how you feel about yourself than it does about how I feel about my time. I have often felt that you are a waste of time, skin, and matter.
        Then I remember that you really are just reaching out pleading for help.
        Mostly likely do to your oral fixation with Equus africanus asinus genitalia.

        I bet you looked that up.
        You did. You can’t help it.

        DLM

      • mosquito

        As is true of every single one of your posts in response to me, you’ve got nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        Your assertion is patently false. Since you’re, in particular, wasting my time by your banal posts in this thread, it is most definitely my concern how you are spending your time on this thread.

        Your logic is atrocious. No logic implies that because someone is reading this thread they decided that reading your mental diarrhea is not a waste of time.

      • Nemisis

        Since you are so concerned with my time;

        I spent the last two days making contributions to St. Jude, opening a deli, closing a bar, fishing, and gathering leaves.
        The latter was not my idea.
        I have had very poor results training trees to go in a box.

        My predictions for this post.
        You will have “know” idea what I said about a tree and a box.

        You will use the word moron or some form of it.

        This will piss you off. You will start to post and then change it.
        Things, you don’t “no” about will be put off to bald assertions.
        Logic in it’s true form eludes you.
        Because trucks walk away from you.

        Hint: Bait is used for fishing. Right Chum?

      • You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Since you are wasting my time, how you choose to spend your time is definitely a concern of mine.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know for a fact.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • You obviously are a moron when it comes to logic.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        ahhhhhh,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but nothing to you means so much to “we”!!!
        =======================================
        because……………..
        >>>>>>>>>>>>>WE LOVE YA<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

      • mosquito

        It does not matter a hill of beans if anything means so much to you. Since you are a moron, your opinion about anything is worthless.

      • It doesn’t matter a hill of beans what it means to anybody. The fact is that such assertions amount to nothing, no matter what anybody thinks.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        delightfully ( and underhandedly) I made the late Mr Buckley part of MY conversation with you–
        ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, your reply was……
        ,………………………was…………………….was……………
        ( what exactly WAS your reply????)

      • mosquito

        Buckley is irrelevant to this discussion. You did not make him part of our conversation. Inserting him in the middle of our conversation is not, as you moronically claim, making him part of our conversation.

      • Buckley is irrelevant to our discussion. That’s a hard, cold, logical fact.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        thank U sir!!! this multi-legged insect is a perfect place to dump obscure yet ubiquitous verbosity on; dontchu agree?
        ********************************************************
        after all; we ”morons” deserve his warmth and ‘non bald’ assertiveness!

      • That’s nonsense. You don’t know what relevant means if you think that Buckley’s remarks are relevant to our discussion.

      • Nemisis

        He claims to be John D. McCarthy Phd. of Michigan State University.
        The very funny thing here is JDM was removed as a teacher/ instructor/professor because he decided to mobilize his lecture throughout the MSU campus while wearing only his socks. Let that sink in a moment.
        His lecture in calculus apparently included a nude rant about Obama, taxes and chickens.

        Just google it.

      • You’re a liar. I was never removed as a teacher/instructor/professor at Michigan State University. If some internet article says that I was, that article is wrong. I have remained a Full Professor of Mathematics at Michigan State University since my promotion to that position if 1998. You’re also a liar about my talking about Obama, taxes and chickens. You’re making this stuff up as you go along or you’ve found at least one article that wrongly reported the nature of my breakdown.

        In any case, the matter of my breakdown is totally irrelevant to the issue at hand. The fact that you think that it is relevant demonstrates what an utter moron you are.

      • Nemisis

        You are correct. YOU were never removed, McCarthy was. You are not McCarthy.
        Evidence that McCarthy was removed is readily available on the internet, a nice video on you tube, an apology from McCarthy, a statement from the university, the fact that he was removed from teaching, the fact that he has no classes according to the MSU website.

        Your behavior here is the exact reason why I want you to finish the equation and remove any doubts as to you being McCarthy. If you are, then it is my duty to make sure you get the help you need.
        If you are not, then your just another troll using the unfortunate events surrounding McCarthy as some sort of stupid callous prank.

      • Once again, you’ve proven yourself to be a moron.

        First of all, I have proven definitively that I am John D. McCarthy. Your opinion to the contrary is worthless and untrustworthy, as I have previously explained. The fact that you either cannot or will not concede this fact demonstrates that you are a moron.

        There is no evidence that I was removed from my position. If you have a statement from the internet that I was, then that statement is totally fallacious and not worth anything.

        You’re a moron. My apology to my class proves absolutely nothing in support of your false claim that I was removed from my university.

        I was not removed from teaching. The fact that my involvement in the teaching mission of my department does not appear on a certain roster of teaching assignments has to do with the peculiar nature of my teaching assignment. Unlike most teaching assignments, my teaching assignment has to do with an online instructional system.

        You’re a moron. The MSU website does not state that I have no classes. Not listing my assignment on the MSU website does not amount to stating that I have no such assignment. Your logic is atrocious.

        What did I tell you about your utterly moronic test?

        There are no doubts about my being McCarthy. I proved that I am John D. McCarthy. That dispelled all doubts. You are just childishly refusing to concede that I proved that I am John D. McCarthy.

      • Nemisis

        Nope. No. No you haven’t. I will not conced to facts that are not in evidence. You have been given ample opportunity to provide actual proof. Since that proof is blatantly not anywhere in your posts. You remain a little monkey. Dance to the street organ little monkey.

      • mosquito

        No, I have definitely proven that I am John D. McCarthy as any competent logician will confirm. Since you are a moron, a fraud, and a liar, your opinion on this matter is worthless and untrustworthy.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I have used no facts that are not in evidence.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        Nah, McCarthy’s breakdown is irrelevant. You are not McCarthy.
        You are a grotesque little monkey impersonating someone with an obvious unstable mental condition for your own sick personal gain.

      • You’re the one that raised the issue of McCarthy’s breakdown. You’re quite a pathetic individual.

        I am John D. McCarthy as I proved with an irrefutable argument. So, you’re full of crap.

        I do not have “an obvious unstable mental condition”. You have absolutely no knowledge of my present mental condition. You’re just making things up as you go along, like the liar that you are.

      • Nemisis

        Your not, you’ve only proven your a big dick. Give it up. You are not McCarthy.

      • mosquito

        If you don’t understand that I proved that I am John D. McCarthy, then it is because you are learning disabled. Any competent logician will confirm that I proved this.

      • Nemisis

        Any competent logician is asking, “What the hell do you think logic is?”
        Then they are laughing at you. They are showing your bullshit to their friends. Among those friends are farmers. Those farmers are showing their bulls your comments. The bulls are denying it is their shit.
        So you have a special kind of mystery bullshit, because “Know”-body or “Know”-bull can recognize it. So it must squirt past your ears on it’s way out of your ass.

      • You’re full of crap. Several competent logicians have looked at my proofs, been impressed with them, and recommended them for publication in some of the best academic journals in the world.

        You’re pathetically prurient and infantile.

      • Nemisis

        Really, several? Got any proof? Or, should we just take your word for that as well. Everyone. Little Monkey says lot’s of logicians are applauding him and demanding he publish these.

        Publish them little monkey, right there in the MSU newspaper.
        Front page stuff this is. Publish away little monkey.

      • mosquito

        I have several publications. To get each one published, it has to be refereed by a competent logician to see that the proofs are valid and then the referee has to recommend it for publication before the journal in question will publish it.

        Since the journals in question are among the best academic journals in the world, this proves that my proofs are not bullshit, as you state in your moronic, empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertion.

      • Nemisis

        And yet all this hard work, with “proven” results, and “proven” concentration levels that would stagger a normal mortal and you can’t finish one fucking equation.

      • Once again, you have proven yourself bereft of a brain. You have no proof that I cannot finish your moronic equation.

        What did I tell you about your imbecilic equation?

      • Nemisis

        Have you finished the equation? No.
        It is not a matter of will not, it is can not.
        Can not, because you are not.
        You are not, yet claim to be.
        If you were, you would.
        You aren’t, so can’t.
        Therefore you suck.
        You suck so much even the donkey doesn’t want you.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as previously explained.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • You’ve got no proof that I cannot finish your equation. You are just mindlessly asserting that I cannot. Again, you’re enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • You have no proof that I can’t finish your equation. You just mindlessly assert that I can’t. You’re addicted to word magic.

      • mosquito

        You write: “Monkey says lot’s of logicians…” which means “Monkey says lot is of logicians…”. What the hell does that mean?

        You’re a pathological liar. I never said anyone was demanding that I publish “these”.

        Your sentence has a “these” in it with no antecedent. You really are quite the moron.

      • Nemisis

        You “no” when you’ve been baited. Yet you still have to reply. You need an intervention.

      • You’re not baiting anyone. You’re hopelessly self deluded in thinking that you are baiting someone.

      • Nemisis

        I just baited you. Not “someone” , just you. Very specific baiting actually. Had some random person taken the bait….but “Know” it was you.

      • mosquito

        You’re not baiting anyone. You’re hopelessly self deluded in thinking that you are baiting someone.

      • You’re a moron. I am someone. So it is impossible that you baited me but “Not “someone””. My God, you’re so pathetically stupid.

      • No, you did not bait anyone. You are too stupid to be able to bait anyone.

      • You haven’t baited anyone. You’re too stupid to be able to do that.

      • Stephen Barlow

        ,,Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.

      • The papers they applauded have all been published. I told you how to get a list of them.

      • I showed you where to get a list of publications of mine. Every one of those publications was refereed by an eminently qualified logician.

      • Stephen Barlow

        .Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, of which you are fully aware.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your assertions.

      • I proved that I am John D. McCarthy. You know this. So, you are lying through your teeth.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        then u know I just called his MICH st work number 517-353-7996 and left a long message, (a) whats is my name (b) what is my number (hint- I live in broward country FL) (c) what time did I call (E.S.T.)?
        ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, wanna bet U “fail” here?

      • mosquito

        Oh really, you left “whats is” your name? I’m not familiar with this word “whats”.

        That’s amazing. There are countries in Florida? Actually, I think that you are hopelessly confused about that.

        I will return your call as soon as possible. I am not at my office right now.

        I proved that I am John D. McCarthy. Any competent logician can confirm that my argument about this is a proof.

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. How would I know that you just called my Michigan State work number? I’m not at my office. Is my hearing supposed to be so good that I hear phone calls from ten miles away? My God, you’re a moron.

      • mosquito

        I will return your call as soon as possible. I am not at my office right now.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        hey schmuck— I also sent him an email at his [email protected] math.msu.e*U
        ===================================
        FUNNY how I haven’t gotten a reply from that—–
        OR: are u too far away from your computer to get that also???
        remember the show ” my favorite martian”?
        well……….im ” your favorite moron ” now–
        ****************************************************
        note– to prove to all of us who are sooooo enthralled with your perfect logic (see: sarcasm) perhaps U can enlighten all of us proletariat types as 2 what “special” word-code I have IN THAT EMAIL??
        HINT: it is written in flawed English!!
        **************************************************
        stay tuned everyone!

      • jamesfitzgerald

        My email address ends in “.edu” for education, not “.e*u”.

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, of which you are aware.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Well, that confirms that I am John D. McCarthy, as I previously proved. And, it also confirms that you are a “putz”, in your own words. You cannot recount the course of events without misrepresenting it. That demonstrates that you are a pathological liar.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        yes U are!!! my apology for doubt! NOW– lets share the truncated conversation we had this morning:
        we agreed u would go 1st– U did; I did NOT interrupt and when U were finished ( in more ways than one) I asked if I may speak; speak without interruption.
        you agreed————–
        I began by paraphrasing my INITIAL comment(post) to you and I didn’t even finish that when U not only INNNN-terupted; but needed to RAISE thy near feminine voice ( that’s needed by those who know they aren’t going to “win”) and did NOT let me even finish my first-and only– reply
        ======================================
        I am pleased to have briefly spoken with the ”human” who was incarcerated ( handcuffed) and brought 2 the local hospital after he stripped down to his matching socks ( see: nude/nudity) in the middle of “TEACHING” his college student populated class.
        Fortunately the schools counseling center ” reached out to offer support to any/all students who witnessed this event”
        police got the call at 1:07 PM on October 2nd
        ====================================
        just a couple of observations here–
        (a) its nice that thru an email U took (dubious) credit for your act and apologized to some students
        (b) based upon the superb photo of u sitting naked against the wall -handcuffed; adorned in those splendid matching socks( sans any other clothing- )– you REALLY need 2 stop eating complex carbs and get in a gym so U may drop that ” William taft” manatee sized stomach that you are burdening your knees & ankles with
        (c) Ive GOTTA party with YOU; man!!
        ====================================
        ever done lysergic acid diethylamide? I bet u would be more fun than the silver surfer on a “drop” of that!
        ===================================
        blog pundits: we should be quite appreciative of Mr McCarthy’s resurrection of arthur Eden’s (tom Wilkinson portrayal) infamous socio-breakdown — replete with nudity DOWN TO HIS SOCKS- in the fabulous and academy award-winning “MICHAEL CLAYTON” movie.
        In your honor I will be having made several Tshirts emossed not only with that delightful hallway photo of U practicing freedom of ( nude) speech,,,,,,but highlighted (OF COURSE) with your name and professional M.S.U. status easily read upon these shirts!
        ,,,,,would u like one? size XXXX tummie large?
        ****************************************************
        now; john– edify us all; who is YOUR “favorite moron” NOW on these threads; eh?
        >>>>> widdle ol’ meeeee? <<<<<

      • You’re a pathological liar. I did not agree to listen to you without interrupting. I explicitly said that I would try to listen. When you started lying, I found it altogether foolish to continue to listen to you without interrupting you to stop you from lying. You’re a totally untrustworthy person. As I told you on the phone, I was not about to just let your unfactual statements (i.e. lies) go by without challenge.

        My mental breakdown is totally irrelevant to our interchange. You are only bringing it up now because you are a pathetic bigot who believes that it puts me in a bad light.

        You have demonstrated yourself to be thoroughly moronic and despicable. It is ignorant people like you who are the reason why mental illness still has a stigma attached to it. You’re human vermin.

      • me

      • You’re a pathological liar. I did not agree to listen to you without interrupting. I explicitly said that I would try to listen. When you started lying, I found it altogether foolish to continue to listen to you without interrupting you to stop you from lying. You’re a totally untrustworthy person. As I told you on the phone, I was not about to just let your unfactual statements (i.e. lies) go by without challenge.

        My mental breakdown is totally irrelevant to our interchange. You are only bringing it up now because you are a pathetic bigot who believes that it puts me in a bad light.

        You have demonstrated yourself to be thoroughly moronic and despicable. It is ignorant people like you who are the reason why mental illness still has a stigma attached to it. You’re human vermin.

      • mosquito

        Me

      • mosquito

        Your account of our conversation is fallacious. I did not agree to let you speak uninterrupted. I specifically said that I would try to listen. But when you started lying, I found it to be totally unwise to let you continue to lie without challenging you.

        Your claim that I was incarcerated is one of your lies.

        You’re a pathetically ignorant bigot. People like you are the reason why mental illness still has a stigma attached to it.

      • mosquito

        Your account of our conversation is fallacious. I never agreed to let you speak without interruption. I specifically said that I would try to listen. But, when you began to lie, I decided that it was foolish to let you continue lying without challenge.

        Your statement that I was incarcerated is one of your lies.

        You are a thoroughly despicable bigot. People like you are the reason why mental illness still has a stigma attached to it.

      • mosquito

        Your account of our conversation is fallacious. I never agreed that I would let you talk uninterrupted. I specifically said that I would try to listen. But, once you started lying, I decided it was not wise to let you continue lying unchallenged.

        Your statement that I was incarcerated is one of your lies.

        You are a pathetic bigot. People like you are the reason why mental illness still has a stigma attached to it.

      • mosquito

        Your account of our conversation is fallacious. I never agreed to allow you to speak without interruption. I specifically stated that I would try to listen. But, when you started lying, I decided that it was unwise to let you continue lying unchallenged.

        Your statement that I was incarcerated is one of your lies.

        You are a pathetic bigot. People like you are the reason why mental illness still has a stigma attached to it.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        I taped the conversation( easy 2 do; im certain U know this) and Im willing to wager my 50K (cash) against your 5K ( cash) that what I wrote above is infallible and what U wrote ( above) is a typical lie engendered by cretins who know that all these internet sites can hide fabulists–and fabulisms– without penalty
        ===================================
        care to call me and listen2 the recording? its actually quite clear- from your introduction a s” mosquito” to your speaking first to your agreeing to NOT interrupt as I agreed- and held said agreement– to do
        =======================================
        the “FUN” part? U interrupted 13 seconds into my verbal delivery of my INITIAL message to you upon this thread. THIRTEEN seconds!! That was during when I said I actually wrote how I thought that WHEN U STAY ON TOPIC U WRITE WELL; and U disrupted/hindered my attempt to finish as well as your increasing your verbal sounds to TRYtryTRY 2 drown me out.
        Dontcha jes’ HATE technology???
        =====================================
        ” mental illness still has a stigma…….”
        Read all of your one dimensional posts to everyone here———– and how your mental state shows why –in your case- mental ” illness’ is so stigmatized
        or,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, are all of us wrong: and mr “socks only teacher” is the benevolent purveyor of good will and cheerful disposition?

      • You’re a liar. I specifically said that I would try to listen. I did not say that I agreed to letting you speak without interruption. I never said any such thing.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • mosquito

        Your account of our conversation is fallacious.

        I never agreed to let you speak without interruption. I specifically stated that I would try to listen. But, then, when you started to make false statements, I decided that it was not wise to let you continue to do this unchallenged.

        Your statement that I was incarcerated is one of your false statements.

        You are a pathetic bigot. People like you are the reason why mental illness still has a stigma attached to it.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, you’ve got nothing. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions add up to, nothing at all.

      • How could I have known yesterday, when you posted your last post above that you had called my Michigan State work number when I was not even at my office? Am I supposed to be able to hear a phone call from ten miles away? My God, you’re a moron.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        I just called the REAL prof mccarthys work number 517-353-7996 and left a message,,,,,i also emailed him but will not release his email- I sent mine from one at a gym I use so no one knows who I am
        ======================================
        in the mean time,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, back to feeding the mosquito!!

      • Here is a message from gian keys that I received yesterday: “then u know I just called his MICH st work number 517-353-7996
        and left a long message, (a) whats is my name (b) what is
        my number (hint- I live in broward country FL) (c) what time
        did I call (E.S.T.)?
        ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, wanna bet U “fail” here?”

        He left a phone message on my office phone yesterday evening. I returned his call this morning and confirmed for him that mosquito is John D. McCarthy.

        So, gian keys had the guts to do what you have avoided in a cowardly fashion for some time now.

      • Nemisis

        Fucking awesome. GK is that legit?

      • I’m mosquito, not gian keys. See a specialist.

      • Nemisis

        You dumb ass, I was asking GK if what you said was legit. Or, do you think only you and I are reading these posts?
        Fucking conceited little monkey. Just dance, no need to squeal.

      • mosquito

        Here is my subsequent interchange with gian keys, in which he acknowledges that I confirmed for him that mosquito and John D. McCarthy are the same person and apologized for having doubted this.

        mosquito

        gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        2 days ago

        Well, that confirms that I am John D. McCarthy, as I previously proved. And, it also confirms that you are a “putz”, in your own words. As demonstrated in our phone conversation this morning, it is clear
        that you cannot recount the course of events without misrepresenting it. That demonstrates that you are a pathological liar. In addition, you
        demonstrated what a bigot you are as you made snide comments about my breakdown of a couple of years ago, a breakdown from which I am fully
        recovered, despite your moronic, empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertion.

        Reply

        Share ›

        gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        mosquito

        2 days ago

        yes U are!!! my apology for doubt!

        You can find these posts under the topic:

        Enough with the Ebola Hysteria: A Few Facts About the Virus that Fox News Doesn’t Want Americans to Believe

      • mosquito

        If you’re addressing gian keys, then post to him, not me. I’m not particularly interested in your conversation with him.

      • Nemisis

        I don’t really care what your interests are.
        GK, I mean JDMNA is not the first person to whom I have directed comments to whilst replying to you. There are perhaps a dozen others.
        Some are blatant, some are very subtle and only the person directed to would actually catch it. It’s a method of communication in a public forum, goes back maybe a few thousand decades.

      • Your method of communication goes back to your infancy. It’s called babbling.

      • Nemisis

        You have nothing…blah blah blah… you “no” the rest.

      • mosquito

        You have nothing as previously explained, moron. That’s not babbling. That’s saying something which is altogether clear.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most assuredly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • No, you have nothing, as I have previously explained.

        Once again, you’ve given unmistakeable proof that you are addicted to the superstition of word magic.

      • You are so narcissistic. It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether you care what my interests are. Stop addressing gian keys via my account. I’m sure that this forum does not look lightly upon that kind of abuse of someone’s personal account, moron.

      • Nemisis

        “Narcissistic”? Why of course I love myself. I’m despicable, remember?
        It is a secondary trait. Followed closely by my malicious pursuit of happiness. What makes me happy is making you dance and jump.

        Do the Toady Dance, little monkey.

      • mosquito

        How could I forget that you are despicable? You wear it as a badge of honor.

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. You’re not making me do anything. I’m the one that is on top of our discussion, not you. You’ve done absolutely nothing during our whole discussion. How could you be on top of our discussion?

      • mosquito

        How could I forget that you are despicable? You wear it as a badge of honor.

        You are not making me do anything. I am the one who is on top of our discussion, not you. You have contributed absolutely nothing to our discussion. So, how could you be on top of our discussion?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as anyone reading your posts knows, including yourself.

        That is why you never try to substantiate your posts.

      • Once again, you’ve proven that you have no hold upon logic. Your premise does not imply your conclusion.

      • You are pathetically childish. Leave this forum. It’s purpose is for adults to carry on an intelligent conversation, not for childish morons to spew forth their mental diarrhea.

      • You’re hopelessly childish. Leave this forum. It is designed for mature adults to have an intelligent conversation not for childish morons to spew forth their mental diarrhea.

      • Nemisis

        “Stop addressing gian keys via my account. I’m sure that this forum does
        not look lightly upon that kind of abuse of someone’s personal account,
        moron.”

        I’m sure you have never read the TOS for Disqus.
        You do “No” that there is a “moron” clause?
        It reads:

        “Excessive use of the word “moron” will be dealt with harshly.
        Disqus reserves the right to surgically attach the lips of any person who uses the word “moron” excessively, to their own rectum. Excessive use will be determined by average use per post. A rate of 30% or more will be deemed as excessive.”

        I suggest some chap-stick be on your shopping list.

      • mosquito

        You’re a pathological liar, moron.

        There is absolutely nothing censurable in exposing fraudulent blowhards, by pointing out, whenever the occasion arises, that they are morons.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You have nothing, as you very well know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate what you assert.

      • You’re a pathological liar.

      • You are so narcissistic. It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether you care what my interests are. Stop using my account to send posts to gian keys. I’m sure that Disqus will not take lightly your abusing my account in that way.

      • Stephen Barlow

        ,,,Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion.

      • Stop posting your communications with gian keys on my account. I have no interest in those communications. I’m sure that Disqus frowns upon such abuse of someone’s account.

      • It’s so tragic. Here is an adult who is bound up inextricably in practicing a superstition, the superstition of word magic.

      • Stephen Barlow

        Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion. .

      • mosquito

        I’m not gian keys. I’m mosquito. If you want to address gian keys, then post to him, not me. I’m not particularly interested in your conversation with him.

      • Nemisis

        Cowardice has nothing to do with any of it.
        Verifying the identity of you without dragging some poor innocent into the path of the impending shit storm.

        If verified by GK, then I will absolutely begin.

      • That’s a load of crap. Cowardice has everything to do with it.

        You can’t put the screws to anyone. Every single one of your posts is moronic, filled with empty, moronic, bald, unsubstantiated assertions. You’ve got nothing.

      • That’s a load of crap. Cowardice has everything to do with it.

        You cannot put the screws to anyone. Your posts are filled with empty, moronic, bald, unsubstantiated assertions. You’ve got nothing.

      • mosquito

        That’s nonsense. Cowardice has everything to do with it.

      • Nemisis

        I think if you had the balls to prove anything you would finish the equation.
        Since you rely on others to prove things for you;
        Take an ad out in the MSU paper declaring who you are.
        You may just want to update McCarthy’s personal website at MSU as well.
        That has not been done since 2012.

        There is all this evidence against you being McCarthy.
        Since it is your claim. it is up to you to prove it.

        Next you will say, I’m a liar, and bald assertion this, and moron that.

      • I have proven everything that I have needed to prove, up to this point. I don’t rely on anyone to prove things for me. I am excellent at proving things.

        I have already proven that I am John D. McCarthy. That’s an established fact. Your statement to the contrary is worthless.

        There is no evidence against me being McCarthy. You are just making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion that there is. Such assertions are empty.

      • Nemisis

        Established in the mind of a gnat. Maybe but not in the real world.

      • mosquito

        Keep telling yourself that, you pathetic twerp. Any competent logician can confirm that all of my arguments in this thread are proofs.

      • Nemisis

        If any logician disagrees with you, they would be considered incompetent by your criteria.
        Therefore your statement is again facts not in evidence and a logical fallacy, which makes you a logically challenged individual.

      • Once again, you’ve proven yourself to be a moron. Of all the many conditional statements which you’ve made in this thread, in response to me, not one of them has a premise which implies its conclusion.

        By your moronic argument, no one could ever claim that they were correct without committing a logical fallacy. So much for your moronic argument, its moronic.

        I am an eminently logical person. One of my colleagues, an internationally renowned mathematician, who once gave a seminal address at the International Congress of Mathematicians, said that I was the most logical person that he had ever met. So, you’re full of crap.

      • Nemisis

        Based strictly on my analyses of your writing style and context you don’t even understand the crap you write. That means you do not have the ability to understand the crap I write.
        Which means you are not qualified to offer an opinion on either your own comments or mine.
        The fact that you can not grasp, or wrap your neural core around the concept is self evident. The fact that you are going to flip your boogers over neural core and wrapping is the very point I am making.
        You simply can not conceive of thought beyond rudimentary context.
        It shows in your writings, and in the grammar you choose.

        Conversational language is a more advanced form of communication than written language is. People have been talking a great many years beyond that of writing so it is a more natural and therefore more advanced method.
        People who have been exposed to each other for a period of time can convey a vast quantity of information by a simple look.
        Words, written or spoken would be redundant and wasteful of energy.

        Since there are simple beasts, such as yourself, we real people must remember that the lowly do not understand unless given exacting and verbose written instruction.
        So while I could stick my tongue out, or flip a finger, or say “Go fuck yourself.” Instead, to you, I would have to explain what those mean.
        Because you are an idiot. That is not your fault, poor genetics, or incest could be the culprit. Or, there might simply be extensive exposure to heavy metals. Not Heavy Metal, that would be a good thing.

        As for your statement. Facts not in evidence. As you continue to claim unverifiable prominence you continue to degrade your position.
        Unsubstantiated facts backed up with more unsubstantiated facts backed up with more unverifiable claims are still bullshit in a blender.
        That is the worth of your comments. Less than a pound of bullshit was used in the making of all the garbage you have pulled directly from your ass and placed on the internet.
        That is quite the efficient use of manure. People normally use it to fertilize. You use it to disguise your weaknesses.

      • That is sheer bullshit. You don’t have a higher form of communication. You just spew forth nonsense. You’ve got absolutely nothing for reasons already explained.

      • That is sheer bullshit. You don’t have a higher form of communication.
        You just spew forth nonsense. You’ve got absolutely nothing for reasons
        already explained.

      • You’re a bullshit artist. You just spew forth whatever occurs to your moronic mind, hoping that we will all fall for your posturing. Your last post is sheer bullshit. You don’t have a higher form of communication. You just spew forth nonsense. You’ve got absolutely nothing for reasons already explained.

      • You’re a bullshit artist. You just spew forth whatever occurs to your
        moronic mind, hoping that we will all fall for your posturing. Your last
        post is sheer bullshit. You don’t have a higher form of communication.
        You just spew forth nonsense. You’ve got absolutely nothing for reasons
        already explained.

      • You’re a bullshit artist. You just spew forth whatever occurs to your
        moronic mind, hoping that we will all fall for your posturing. Your last
        post is sheer bullshit. You don’t have a higher form of communication.
        You just spew forth nonsense. You’ve got absolutely nothing for reasons
        already explained.

      • mosquito

        You’re a bullshit artist. You just spew forth whatever occurs to your
        moronic mind, hoping that we will all fall for your posturing. Your last
        post is sheer bullshit. You don’t have a higher form of communication.
        You just spew forth nonsense. You’ve got absolutely nothing for reasons
        already explained.

      • Nemisis

        artist well that is something of a point of view wouldnt you agree
        there is no posturing here simply accurate observation of the truth as it evolves and contorts through time i never claimed i have a higher form of communication i was discussion communication in and its evolution through our history that you feel written word is a higher form is not my problem i would be happy to discuss this in greater detail if you were to adopt a more civil attitude who knows you may even learn something that you do not know or profess to know that could help you later in life i am not convinced of that possibility yet it is still plausible your reasons fall short of being explanations as they contain no merit they lack substance and accuracy i have all that i want all that i need perhaps your anger and frustration is due to your lacking that thing that everyone else has well most everyone else
        i do enjoy a nice long post free of punctuation it leaves much to the imagination and much to the chagrin of grammatical zealots very fun

      • mosquito

        There is no accurate observation coming from you. Everything you write is bullshit.

        You most definitely claimed to have a higher form of communication. You’re so stupid you don’t even remember your own statements.

        I am not angry or frustrated. How could I be angry or frustrated when you make it extremely easy for me to refute you with your stupid posts.

        As my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in their mouth.

        You’re a bullshit artist.

      • Nemisis

        Perhaps you could cite that statement there Dr. Wrong.

        Your anger and frustration is clearly evident.
        Even your mother is telling you to calm down.

      • mosquito

        “Conversational language is a more advanced form of communication than written language is”

        You’ve got nothing for reasons previously explained.

      • Nemisis

        I see nothing about how that form of communication is mine.
        I laid no claim to it. In fact, it is public domain.
        Anyone may use it, though you will have difficulty.

      • If I drink water from my faucet, it’s my water even though it’s coming from the public domain. Your logic is atrocious.

      • Nemisis

        It’s not your water. It is water you simply have right now. You will return it eventually. Something in the public domain is there for everyone and everything no one person may own it. They just use it till they are done.
        You are a very dumb person to think that you own anything.
        Everyone knows that only a full-on idiot would reply to this post.

      • You’re a blathering idiot. Of course, it’s my water. I purchase it from the Board of Water and Light.

        You have absolutely no regard for the truth. You’ll say anything if you believe that it supports your cause.

      • Of course it is my water. I paid the Board of Water and Light for it.

        You have no regard for the truth. You will say anything if you believe that it will support your case.

      • Of course, it’s my water. I paid the Board of Water and Light for it.

        You have no regard for the truth. You will say anything if you believe it supports your case.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Nonsense, it is definitely my water. I paid the Board of Water and Light for it.

        You have no regard for the truth. You will say anything if you believe that it will support your position.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        It is definitely my water. I paid the Board of Water and Light for it.

      • It is obviously my water. I paid the Board of Water and Light for it.

        Again, you’re painfully obviously enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • The fact that water is in the public domain does not imply that the water which I use in my house is not mine. So, your “logic” is not logic, it’s just plain stupid.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You said that conversational English is more advanced than written English.

        Your “logic” in support of this was that conversational English is older than written English and is, therefore, more advanced. That’s a very stupid argument. That argument implies that a ninety year old mental deficient has a more advanced intellect than Stephen Hawking. That is to say, it’s not logical, it’s just stupid.

        You fabricate your statements. There is nothing in what I have written in this thread that suggests I am angry or frustrated.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • You said that conversational English is more advanced than written English.

        Your argument for this is quite stupid. You assert that because conversational English is older than written English, then it is more advanced. By that moronic argument, a 90 year old mental deficient is more advanced mentally than Stephen Hawking.

      • mosquito

        No, it’s an objective fact. You’re a bullshit artist. The proof is your body of posts in response to me. There is not a single one of these posts which is not sheer bullshit. It’s really quite amazing. You would have better success saying something valid if you pulled statements out of a bag of statements and posted them here.

      • Nemisis

        you stole that from me you garden slug get back to your own line of bullshit truth you cant handle the truth you cant even fold a fucking map without pissing yourself

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing as you clearly know. That is why you have not even once made so much as a feeble attempt to substantiate your idiotic statements.

      • mosquito

        That may be so. But, when you said it, it was a lie. When I said it, it was true.

      • Nemisis

        Hmmm, you do have a pointy head there.
        Possibly the reason you are wrong, or just one more reason.
        I have already entered into evidence the fact that you are indeed a liar.
        Everything you say is a lie, therefore you are lying about not stealing.
        Now you are a liar and a thief and if you are JDM then you are also a nutcase who should be locked up behind bars so you can not expose yourself to the populace. When I say expose yourself I directly mean stripping down to socks and committing criminal acts. Such as;
        lewd and lascivious behavior with public indecency and disturbing the public. To complicate the entire situation, if you are JDM, then you should be forced to refund the money people wasted getting a useless education from you. Your math is flawed, your brain is addled, you can barely fold a map. You have the attention span of a wet match, the demeanor of a badger getting dental work done, a beard that you think makes you look smarter yet only catches crumbs from your lunch, bad breath, the pinched look of someone who just sharted, the accompanying odor, and you owe money to the library.

        Since you are not JDM, your just the bivot in JDM’s sharted in skivvies.

      • You have not entered that assertion into evidence. You cannot enter that assertion into evidence, because it’s a lie.

        I committed no criminal act. Read one of the online article. It specifically says that I would not be charged with any crime. That’s because my action was caused by a disease, not by criminal intent.

        A number of my students testified over the years that I was the best teacher that they ever had. My students definitely got their money’s worth out of me.

        My math is excellent. That is why I have been published in some of the best mathematical journals in the world. You’ve got nothing for reasons previously explained.

        You know this. That is why you never attempt to substantiate your lies.

      • Nemisis

        ” Read one of the online article”
        That is senseless.

        I never claimed you were charged. I stated the criminal acts committed by JDM. He should have been charged. However, because he was crying like a little puss people felt sorry for him. Showed him compassion. Personally, I would have treated him like everyone else would have been treated. Paraded his ass out to a patrol car, arrested him and put his ass in jail. There he would have mad lots of new friends.

        You have published nothing but the continuous stream of ass vomit you call constructive commentary.

        You are not McCarthy.
        McCarthy’s students are to tired from being forced to listen to the garbage he spews at them. Most of it is not even math related.

        McCarthy does not have a disease.
        He is just a self-winding spring of bat-shit crazy.

        You are simple.

      • You’re ridiculous. Typographical errors are not “senseless”.

        You’re ridiculous. If you are not charged with a criminal act, then it’s not criminal. To say that something is criminal is to say that it is a crime. A crime is an act that makes the actor liable to punishment. My act did not make me liable to punishment because it was done as a consequence of my illness. The reason why I was not charged was because I was not liable to be charged. That’s the law.

        You’re a liar. You’re making up your story as you go along. I was never crying like a little puss.

        You’re a liar. You made up the story about my students.

        You are a pathological liar.

        You’ve got nothing for reasons already given.

        You know this to be true. That is why you never try to substantiate your lies.

        That’s interesting. You have a string of adjective. My God, you’re a moron.

      • In order for my act to be criminal it has to be a crime. In order to be a crime, I would have to have been liable to punishment for it. But, I was not liable to punishment for it, because it was done as a result of my illness, not by way of criminal intent. I was not charged for the act, because I could not be charged for the act, because I was not liable, because the act was done as a result of my illness. That’s the law.

        You’re a pathological liar. You’re making your story up as you go along. I was never “crying like a little puss”. You fabricated that story out of thin air.

        You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never substantiate what you spew forth.

      • A typographical error is not “senseless”.

        In order for my act to be criminal, it has to be a crime. In order for it to be a crime, I have to have been liable to punishment. But, I was not liable to punishment, since my act was the result of my illness, not the result of criminal intent. So, my act was not a crime; my act was not criminal. That’s the law.

        You’re a pathological liar. I never “was crying like a little puss”. You made this up out of thin air.

        You’ve got nothing, which you know. That is why you never attempt to substantiate your lies.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        A typographical error is not “senseless”.

        You’ve got nothing, as you surely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        A typographical error is not “senseless”.

      • You’re silly. A typographical error is not senseless.

        You definitely claimed that I was charged. You claim that I was arrested. That involves a charge. You cannot arrest someone without charging them.

        Again, you’re hopelessly addicted to the superstition of word magic.

      • This post demonstrates thoroughly that you are a complete ignoramus. It says nothing about me, but volumes about you. You’ve made a complete ass out of yourself.

      • Nemisis

        No, princess, I have done nothing. I have not even made an ass out of you. You saved me the trouble.
        Only a fucking illiterate socially repugnant rectal wort would reply to this comment and everyone knows this to be true.

      • This post demonstrates thoroughly that you are a complete ignoramus. It
        says nothing about me, but volumes about you. You’ve made a complete ass
        out of yourself.

      • This post demonstrates thoroughly that you are a complete ignoramus. It
        says nothing about me, but volumes about you. You’ve made a complete ass
        out of yourself.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your fabrications.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never attempt to substantiate what you post.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons I previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you very well know for sure.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’re pathetically addicted to the superstition of word magic.

      • Once again, you have shown, in a decisive manner, that you are hopelessly enslaved to the superstition of word magic. You are quite a pathetic individual.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your logic is atrocious. The fact that I said the same thing as you does not imply that I stole that thing from you. Actually, they are not the same thing. When you said your thing, you were speaking a falsehood. When I said my thing, I was speaking the truth. That proves that the two things are different.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your logic is atrocious. If I say “hello” after you say “hello”, it does not follow that I stole “hello” from you. In my discipline, there are numerous examples where two different mathematicians, proved the same result at about the same time, totally independent of one another. Nobody says, like you moronically say, “you stole that result from me”. They don’t say it because they are logical and they know that it doesn’t follow. You have not got a clue about what follows from what. That is why you continually make conditional statements with a premise that doesn’t imply the corresponding conclusion.

      • You’re quite illogical. According to your moronic “logic”, if I say hello after you say hello, then I stole hello from you. In my discipline, it frequently happens that two mathematicians prove the same result at the same time. Neither of these two mathematicians accuses the other of stealing his result because they know that that does not follow. They are not as illogical as you, nowhere nears as moronically illogical as you.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, of which you are altogether aware.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        You can’t even decided who the fuck you are.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You moronically went from present, “can’t”, to past, “decided”.

        Your logic is atrocious. I don’t need to “decided” who the fuck I am. I know who the fuck I am.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Wow, my English isn’t that advanced. How do you do that trick of switching tenses in midstream, from the present, “can’t”, to the past, “decided”?

      • You’ve got nothing, as you very well know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate your posts.

      • You’re a moron. You moronically went from the present “can’t” to the past “decided”.

      • You moronically went from the present, “can’t”, to the past, “decided”.

      • You’ve moronically gone from the present “can’t” to the past “decided”.

      • You most definitely claimed that you had a higher form of communication.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, of which you are keenly aware.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re a bullshit artist. You made no such analysis. You make this stuff up as you go along.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • You’re a bullshit artist. You made no such analysis. You’re lying through your teeth.

        Your logic is atrocious. By your logic about a greater number of years implying more advancement, a ninety year old mental deficient is more advanced intellectually than Stephen Hawking. In other words, your argument is not logical. It’s just plain stupid.

        All the facts to which I have appealed are in evidence. Again, you’re a bullshit artist. You’re lying through your teeth.

      • You’re a pathological liar. You never did an analysis of my writing style.

      • You’re not only logically challenged, you are completely incompetent with logic. The fact that my proof is a proof is definitely in evidence. The proof is evidence that it is a proof. A proof bears all the marks of a proof and nothing but a proof does.

      • You’ve got nothing. I’ve got the entire community of competent logicians. You lost.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong, you fail. Again.

        No logician would attach their name in actual support of your statements. In fact; Your statements have been voted as the all time “Worst Ass Phlegm Ever” by all logicians, including those you claim to support you. That is the extent of their support for you. You can see what the award looks like by peering into any septic tank just prior to it being drained.

      • mosquito

        That’s utter nonsense. You’ve got nothing. You continue to moronically make bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which is an asinine activity.

        Any logician would attach their name in support of my statements. They would be more than happy to do this.

        You’re a pathological liar.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Any competent logician would gladly confirm that my arguments are proofs.

      • It’s quite pathetic watching you take another “fix” of word magic.

      • Your response is an empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertion. That is, it is nothing.

      • Any competent logician will readily confirm that my argument is a proof. You’ve got nothing, but lame, empty assertions. You belong to the cult of word magic worshippers.

      • Stephen Barlow

        ..Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion. .

      • mosquito

        Cowardice has everything to do with it.

        It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether or not you acknowledge that I am John D. McCarthy. Since you are a moron, a fraud, and a liar, your opinion about anything, including me, is worthless and untrustworthy.

      • Nemisis

        You make me so sad.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, of which you are definitely aware.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you surely know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Cowardice has everything to do with it.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Cowardice definitely has something to do with it, coward.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        I just lookd it up– its true and I also hav his work Ph# and email address; I sent him NICE ( seriously) messages letting him know that some small dicked LOSER ( mosquito micropenileus) was claiming to be him,,,,,
        stay tuned tomorrow — I will have complete details
        ========================================
        in the meantime,,,,,,,,back 2 destroying this splendid moron mosquito!!!

      • BB-Mystic

        PLEASE let us know what happens!

      • BB-Mystic

        Just ignore it and keep flagging its idiotic comments. That’s what I’m doing. Hopefully the moderator will wake up and ban/delete its stupid logician ass.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        then he will just crawl into another regressive troll ‘profile’,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, so I actually encourage them to play with me— it seems they have neither the moxie or intellect to stay with me ( or whoever else castrates them with FACTS)

      • You’ve got nothing, gian keys. For bald, unsubstantiated assertions
        amounts to nothing. So, by your post, you’ve contributed absolutely
        nothing to this thread.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        hey kreskin—————-
        I BEGGED you to TRYtryTRY 2 come up with some new insults
        ========================================
        creativity; it seems walks hand in hand with your history of females adorning your anatomically flawed ‘physique’
        ========================================
        oh; and I have added much to this thread– I have forced you to ( a) look up delightful ENGLISH words which U didn’t know (b) allowed you the dubious luxury of RE-USING the same droll phrasing you are anchored by (c) kept U stuck here — not against your ‘will’— by actually wasting time responding to me (note: im not alone in that querimony)
        ===================================
        write back soon; and take comfort in the fact that today it was 78 degrees here with a placid ‘verde’ colored ocean nestled beneath a cloudless susurrant sky in 45% humidity!!! OCTOBER in SE florida??? ATARAXIA !!!!!!!

      • mosquito

        Why are you so infatuated with proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, you’ve got nothing, not a thing. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • You’ve got nothing, BB-Mystic. For bald, unsubstantiated assertions amounts to nothing. So, by your post, you’ve contributed absolutely nothing to this thread.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being a mindlessly repeating pompous ass*

      • As my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in their mouth. My posts have been eminently intelligent. They are neither mindless nor pompous.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being a mindlessly repeating unintelligent pompous ass*

      • As my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in their mouth. My
        posts have been eminently intelligent. They are neither mindless nor
        pompous.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being a pitiful pompous ass who is taking refuge in its mother’s skirts*

      • You’ve got nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing. Do you find yourself entertained by doing nothing? If you do, that speaks volumes about your intelligence.

      • BB-Mystic

        Well, dudelet, if you would shut up and go away, we wouldn’t be entertained by you any more, would we?

        *flagged for being a bald unsubstantiated pompous ass*

      • You’ve raised a straw man. Raising a straw man is one of the most basic of logical errors.

      • BB-Mystic

        So? Dudelet, I have no interest in your kind of “logical.” You should know that by now.

        *flagged for being a pompous trollish straw person*

      • mosquito

        We’ve already gone over this. Your reading comprehension is atrocious. It does not matter a hill of beans whether you are interested in logic.

      • BB-Mystic

        Just like it does not matter a hill of beans what you say.

        *flagged for being a pompous hill of beans* 😀

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, you’ve got nothing, nothing at all. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, you’ve got nothing at all. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • Like I said, you’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • BB-Mystic

        Dudelet, no matter how many times you repeat it, that doesn’t make it true.

        *flagged for being a bald unsubstantiated pompous ass*

      • mosquito

        You just showed how illogical you are by raising a straw man. Raising a straw man is one of the most basic logical errors.

        No, repeating something does not make it true. But the statement in question, whose truth you are apparently questioning, is one of the first principles of logic and, hence, is undoubtedly true.

      • BB-Mystic

        Dudelet! We already know I’m an illogical moron! So? Expand your vocabulary! You’re supposed to be the “logician,” aren’t you? Let’s generate some better insults here!

        *flagged for being a pompous logician ass*

      • mosquito

        Why are you so devoted to proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect? Logicians are not English professors.

      • BB-Mystic

        Dudelet! We’ve already settled that! Let’s move on to the next ridiculous insult!

        I have all the self-respect I need, and your wasting so much of your time on me is only adding to it.

        Is the word “professor” anywhere in my comment? You don’t need to be a professor to expand your vocabulary. Expanding one’s vocabulary is a worthy goal in and of itself.

        *flagged for being a pompous LOGICIAN ass*

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. You don’t even remember your own statements. You suggested that because I was a logician (a certain type of professor), then I should be able to come up with other insults, as if I was a professor of English. That’s the point, moron.

      • BB-Mystic

        “There’s no more faith in thee than in a stewed prune.”

        ~Henry V

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, you’ve got nothing. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions add up to, nothing.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, you’ve got nothing. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing at all.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, you’ve got nothing. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • As I said, you’ve got nothing. That’s what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • As I said, you’ve got nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        he does have the biggest dick–
        ………..it is RUDELY infected; thus his paucity of human sexual partners
        =======================================
        quotidian post prandial onanism is his dogma

      • GenerallyConfused

        Thank you oh so much for the mental picture I really didn’t need before bed.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts, not even a feeble attempt to do so.

      • Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you assuredly know.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts, not even a feeble attempt to do so.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts, not even a feeble attempt to do so.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        wanna wager me a whole ” dolla” that his social skills are mirrored by his paucity of aesthetic physical qualities? ( see: ”sans female company”)

      • Nemisis

        Careful, Gnat doesn’t think people actually bet against him.

      • You’re deeply confused. I don’t just think that you’re not betting about my posts. I know that you’re not doing this. Your whole purpose in carrying on your charade about doing this is to wage a pathetic attempt to save your face. It’s failing miserably.

      • Nemisis

        Still more wrong. Did you finish the equation monkey boy?
        No you did not. Reason: You can not. Result: Your a fraud.

      • No, I’m right.

        What did I tell you about your moronic test?

        Your logic is atrocious. Your premises do not imply your conclusions. Give it up. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic.

      • Nemisis

        Here is what you have told me.

        You can not complete the equation.

        You are not McCarthy and that is why.

      • mosquito

        You’re a pathological liar. I’ve told you no such thing.

        You are also pathetically illogical. Your premises never imply your conclusions.

      • Nemisis

        Did you complete the equation in your last post, or any post?
        No.
        Therefore you’ve told me you can not. Remember, this is not a debate as you are ill-suited for debate. Your posts are being recommended to the NFL as examples of what not to do.

        You can not prove and have not proven any claim you have made.
        You have proven through lack of ability and through lack of any real “No”ledge the very opposite of what you claim.

        I told you before you lack a very specific thing that prevents you from being successful at pretty much anything, have you figured that out yet?
        Are you still stuck on this word problem?
        Have you any idea of what you are being told?
        You really have a feeble understanding of communication.

        Just dance little monkey.

      • You’ve got nothing. For that is what all bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • You’ve once again proven that you are a moron. Your premise does not imply your conclusion. Why do you keep doing this? It’s a moronic activity.

        Any competent logician can confirm that I have proven everything I claimed to have proven. Your contrary opinion is worthless, since you are a moron. You’ve got nothing. I’ve got the entire community of competent logicians.

        I am excellent at communication. You, on the other hand, babble.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you definitely know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

        It doesn’t matter what you told me before. Every single thing that you wrote before has been removed from our debate since it is unsubstantiated. So, effectively, you have yet to have said a single thing.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate any of your posts.

      • No, everything which I have said in this thread is correct.

        Your logic is atrocious. Your premises never imply your conclusions.

      • Nemisis

        Nothing in this thread you have said has anything to do with logic. None of your arguments are logic based. Nothing you say is true.
        Nothing you claim to have proved is valid because it has not been proven. Everything you post is complete bullshit designed to distract from the real issue and that issue is you are one gigantic human itch mite.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, absolutely nothing. When are you going to learn that bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t ever even try to substantiate your posts.

      • My social skills are just fine. I’m known as a person with a healthy sense of humor and one who is very compassionate. The staff and faculty in my department all like me very much. You’re full of crap. You’ve got nothing.

      • Avatar

        Yet another moron word from you!

      • mosquito

        As the saying goes, I believe in calling a spade a spade, especially when the object of my calling someone a moron is a fraudulent blowhard.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being a redundant logic-troll*

      • You’re a moron. Calling someone a moron on several occassions for different reasons does not amount to redundancy. And I am no troll. You are just making a moronic bald, unsubstantiated assertion that I am, which amounts to nothing. So, with your post, you’ve contributed absolutely nothing to this conversation.

      • BB-Mystic

        Dudelet, the conversation was going just fine until you came along, and if you would just Shut Up and Go Away, it would return to normal.

        Believe me, we won’t miss you.

        This is why I am flagging Every. Single. Comment. You. Make. Hopefully the mods will wake up and ban your trollish ass.

      • I think that it’s abundantly clear that the conversation was not going just fine, unless you count moronic conversations as being conversations that go just fine.

        As the Scriptures declare, fools despise correction.

      • BB-Mystic

        The conversation was going just fine because you were absent from it.

        And you still haven’t answered my question. Who appointed you the thread police?

        At any rate, I just tweeted to Allen Clifton about you. He’s responded to a tweet from me regarding another troll (who was subsequently deleted) so let’s see what he does about you.

        *still flagged*

      • No, it’s obvious that the conversation was not going just fine. For instance, people were posting bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which is a moronic activity. That’s not my opinion. That’s a cold, hard, logical fact.

      • BB-Mystic

        Again, who appointed you the thread police? It’s not your job to correct anybody. We’re not your fucking students (if you even have any–I don’t know how you can conduct your “classes” and spend so much time on this site).

        Also, who gives a shit if anyone posts “bald unsubstantiated assertions”?

        *flagged for being a cold hard pompous ass*

      • It’s my job to expose fraudulent blowhards. I am doing a service to everyone who reads this thread, by exposing such people.

        The Scripture says to rebuke one another. So, it is every Christian’s job to correct others.

        It does not matter a hill of beans whether you are my students. Fraud hurts everyone. Someone should do something about this. I’m doing something about it.

        Anyone of any intelligence gives a shit about people posting bald, unsubstantiated assertions. Do you think that it’s some sort of advantage to have a forum look the other way when people are being illogical? If you do, that speaks volumes about your intelligence.

      • BB-Mystic

        Oh, bullshit. This is not your site. We don’t need or want your “service;” we don’t need or want your “logic,” (such as it is) and we don’t need or want you here. It is the height of arrogance and stupidity to keep inserting yourself where you’re not wanted.

        Since this is a progressive site, not a Christian one, it doesn’t matter a “hill of beans” what Scripture says. Also, not everyone here is a Christian. You are not my God, and you have no business policing either this site or my faith.

        It’s certainly an advantage to have a forum not be interrupted by a stupid arrogant troll. And I can worry about my own intelligence, or lack thereof, and my own logic, or lack thereof. Neither your deluded “opinions” or your fake “facts” mean anything to me.

        *flagged for still being a pompous ass*

      • mosquito

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. You’re quite narcissistic. It doesn’t matter a hill of beans what you think.

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I never said that I was providing you with a service. I said that I was providing the readership of this thread with the service of exposing people like you for being the frauds and the blowhards that you are.

        You’re quite an intellectual pygmy. Everyone needs logic. You cannot drive to work without using logic.

        It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether you need or want me here. That is totally insignificant. Since you are a moron, none of your opinions have any significance whatsoever.

        Your very big on bald, unsubstantiated assertions. They amount to nothing. That is a fact of reality. You cannot escape it. You can ignore it to your own peril, but you cannot escape it.

        Your comments about Christianity and God are one big straw man. Constructing straw men is a basic logical error. That again is a fact of reality. You cannot escape it. You can ignore it to your own peril, but you cannot escape it.

        I am not a stupid arrogant troll. I am not stupid. I am not arrogant. And, I am not a troll. Your assertion that I am is just another one of your empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertions. You’ve not contributed anything to this thread with all of your empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertions.

        I have every right to critique anything anyone posts on this thread. Your assertion that I don’t is just another one of your empty, bald, unsubstantiated assertions.

        Apparently, you are doing a terrible job of taking care of your own intelligence and logic. You need to go back to school and get a decent education.

        My opinions are not deluded. I proved that all of them are true. I did the same for my facts. So, you’re full of crap up to the top of your head.

      • BB-Mystic

        Y’know, dudelet, with the amount of time you waste refuting me, you could grade ten or twelve of your supposed “student’s” papers.

        Not that it matters a hill of beans what you think or say.

        Also, the “readership of this thread”–and the owner of this site–never asked you to provide anything. That being so, once again you’re sticking your nose where it doesn’t belong.

        So I’m exposed! Oooh! I’m so scared!

        Since you are a logician moron, none of your opinions have any significance whatsoever.

        I am not a stupid arrogant troll. I am not stupid. I am not arrogant. And, I am not a troll.

        Methinks thou doth protest too much!

        Critiquing and policing are two different things, dudelet. Or are you one of the moderators? If you are, why haven’t you already banned me? And Nemesis and Giankeys and anyone else who dares tell you you’re full of shit?

        I sure as hell would have banned you by now. You must know your atrocious behavior would have gotten you tossed out on your ass long ago at most sites.

        Your deluded “opinions” and your fake “facts” still don’t mean anything to me. Just as your stating you “proved” something doesn’t make it so.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        perhaps he ( mosquito) is ” critiquing his own policing”?
        naaaah,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, that might be a bald unsubstantiated assertion by a moron which doesn’t amount to a hill of beans
        ( ” jim bean “??????)

      • BB-Mystic

        Nah, I don’t think this is a Jim Bean sockpuppet. Jim Bean is far more sensible and articulate than this creep.

      • mosquito

        As my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in their mouth.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        was your mommies “taste” magnified in the matching socks that U were superbly adorned in when U were siting upright– handcuffed; NUUUUDE and disoriented – in the hallway of the Michigan state university that U “teach” at?
        OR— did u pick those widdle footwarmers all by thyself?
        ( they were so CUUUUTE!!,,,,,,,little puppies and kittens wanted to unravel them; but the armed police didn’t allow those quadriped ‘fans’ of yours near you)
        ,,,,at least the police were keeping THEIR wits ; eh?

      • mosquito

        Thanks for making it so unmistakeable that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you knew the minute you wrote your post.s

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know now.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        There’s hope for you, gian keys. You’re finally beginning to catch on. Maybe you’ll finally stop posting bald, unsubstantiated assertions which don’t amount to a hill of beans.

      • mosquito

        Thanks for making life easy for me by proving, all by yourself, that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        What I say on this thread most definitely matters a hill of beans? It is all the consequence of sound reasoning. That makes it significant.

        Your quite big on bald, unsubstantiated assertions. It doesn’t matter whether the owner of this site asked me to provide anything. The owner of this site gave me the privilege of posting on this site. I have every right to make my posts be about making a critique of other posts on this site. So, I am most definitely not sticking my nose where it doesn’t belong.

        It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether you care that your exposed. All that matters is that the readers of this thread know that your a fraudulent blowhard.

        You write “Methinks…”. You’re quite confused. You don’t think. You just react in a moronic fashion.

        Your comment about critiquing and policing is one big straw man. It’s not surprising that you raise a straw man. After all, you’re a moron.

        I have no deluded opinions or fake facts. You’re just letting your stupid show by claiming that I do.

        Your last sentence is another straw man. I never claimed that stating I proved something makes it so. The reason why it is true that I proved something is contained in my proofs. Any competent logician can confirm that I proved everything that I claim to have proven. Since you are a moron, your opinion to the contrary is worthless.

      • BB-Mystic

        Dudelet! You’re still repeating yourself, and it still matters not a whit. This is the exact same thing you’ve said dozens of times before. Don’t you get tired of typing the same things over and over, and realizing that nothing’s changed?

        So the readers of the thread know I’m a fraudulent blowhard. So what? They’re still talking to me, and I’m still talking to them, and nobody’s said anything about it except you!

        Therefore one might conclude that…gasp, horror!…we like it this way!

        Yes, Mr. Logic-Troll! We thoroughly enjoy being illogical morons, and we love tossing about bald unsubstantiated assertion! It makes our day to tangle with stupid arrogant trolls who barge onto our threads and argue endlessly with us just for the dubious pleasure of proving himself “right,” at least in his own rarefied academic mind!

        Which makes absolutely no difference in the real world! Life will go on, I’ll still be an illogical moron throwing around my bald unsubstantiated assertions, and no one will give a shit about it except you! Which, since you’re not my boss, professor or a person having anything at all to do with me, amounts to nothing more than white noise humming in the background!

        Are you really telling me you don’t recognize the source of my quote? I didn’t pull that “methinks” out of my ass, you know. If you did recognize it, why didn’t you say so?

        HAMLET

        Madam, how like you this play?

        GERTRUDE

        The lady protests too much, methinks.

        HAMLET

        Oh, but she’ll keep her word

        220 CLAUDIUS

        Have you heard the argument? Is there no offense in ’t?

        HAMLET

        No, no, they do but jest. Poison in jest. No offense i’ th’ world.

        “Poison in jest,” indeed.

        You might also try this quote on for size, seeing as you’re still struggling with that vocabulary expansion. (From Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 5.)

        Out, out, brief candle!
        Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player
        That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
        And then is heard no more: it is a tale
        Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
        Signifying nothing.

        Toodles, Mr. Logic-Troll. Have a fine meaningless day!

      • You’re hopelessly confused. Saying the same thing in a different context for a different reason is not repeating oneself.

        You wrote: “So the readers of the thread know I’m a fraudulent blowhard. So what?
        They’re still talking to me, and I’m still talking to them, and nobody’s
        said anything about it except you!” You’re a pathological liar. Your fraudulent blowhard friends are still talking to you. So what?

        It doesn’t matter a hill of beans if you like it this way. It will come back upon your heads for sure.

        You are thoroughly moronic. You actually believe that when you make bald, unsubstantiated assertions you’re making a point. For instance, you think that when you say “Which makes absolutely no difference in the real world!” that that statement has any significance whatsoever. It’s really quite pathetic to watch you beat your chest like a moronic ape.

        Or, for another example of your banality, how about this empty assertion of yours: “Which, since you’re not my boss, professor or a person having anything
        at all to do with me, amounts to nothing more than white noise humming
        in the background!”. It’s really pathetic. You’re accomplishing absolutely nothing with these empty assertions and you’re patting yourself on the back for it.

        Like I said, you’re hopelessly confused in using your Shakespearean quote. You don’t think at all. All you do is react in a moronic fashion.

      • You’re truly a moron. You’re trying to apply Shakespeare’s words about an idiot full of sound and fury to a person stressing the importance of logic. Shakespeare would give you a good smack for dragging his good name through the muck of your ignorant idiocy.

      • BB-Mystic

        Well, good, dudelet. I’m glad we know where we stand.

        I’m done with your worthless, pointless, meaningless ass. Just know that I’ll still be on these threads, and I’ll still be my badass illogical moronic self, and there’s not a fucking thing you can do about it.

        If you try to talk to me again, all you’ll get in reply are Shakespeare quotes. If you want to argue with a dead man, go right ahead. Enjoy your 400-year-old circle jerk. That’s all you and your “arguments” are worth.

        Out, out, brief candle!
        Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player
        That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
        And then is heard no more: it is a tale
        Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
        Signifying nothing.

      • mosquito

        BB-Mystic, you’re obstinately incorrigible. You’re so enamored of your own thoughts that you are resistant to correction. It’s likely that you will never learn that your bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

        There is nothing worthless, pointless, or meaningless about me. The fact that you think there is says volumes about you, nothing about me.

        My arguments are worth quite a bit, even if you just consider what they could teach someone about constructing an irrefutable logical argument. One of my colleagues, a world renowned mathematician, once told me that I was the most logical person he had ever met. So, my logical arguments are quite significant. Again, speaking about people like you, my mother would say that some people’s taste is all in their mouth.

        You’re truly a moron. You’re trying to apply Shakespeare’s words about an idiot full of sound and fury to a person stressing the importance of logic. Shakespeare would give you a good smack for dragging his good name through the muck of your ignorant idiocy. Shakespeare was a learned man, not a know nothing fraudulent blowhard like you.

        All that your talk about what you don’t care about does is reveal what an ignoramus you are. It demonstrates that you are lacking in taste and discernment. You say that what I talk about has nothing to do with the real world. You have not got a clue about what is the real world. You think that the real world is whatever your small mind can comprehend. My God, that’s a pretty small real world in which you live.

      • mosquito

        BB-Mystic, you’re obstinately incorrigible. You’re so enamored of your own thoughts that you are resistant to correction. It’s likely that you will never learn that your bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

        There is nothing worthless, pointless, or meaningless about me. The fact that you think there is says volumes about you, nothing about me.

        My arguments are worth quite a bit, even if you just consider what they could teach someone about constructing an irrefutable logical argument. One of my colleagues, a world renowned mathematician, once told me that I was the most logical person he had ever met. So, my logical arguments are quite significant. Again, speaking about people like you, my mother would say that some people’s taste is all in their mouth.

        You’re truly a moron. You’re trying to apply Shakespeare’s words about an idiot full of sound and fury to a person stressing the importance of logic. Shakespeare would give you a good smack for dragging his good name through the muck of your ignorant idiocy. Shakespeare was a learned man, not a know nothing fraudulent blowhard like you.

        All that your talk about what you don’t care about does is reveal what an ignoramus you are. It demonstrates that you are lacking in taste and discernment. You say that what I talk about has nothing to do with the real world. You have not got a clue about what is the real world. You think that the real world is whatever your small mind can comprehend. My God, that’s a pretty small real world in which you live.

      • BB-Mystic

        “Thou art a flesh-monger, a fool and a coward.”
        ~Measure for Measure

      • mosquito

        As is always true with your posts, you have got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls them fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • BB-Mystic

        “Thou clay-brained guts, thou knotty-pated fool, thou whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch!”

        ~Henry IV Part 1

      • mosquito

        As is always true with your posts, you have not got anything. For bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls them fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        You’re obstinately incorrigible. You are so enamored of your own thoughts that you are resistant to correction. It is likely that you will never learn that your bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

        There is nothing worthless, pointless, or meaningless about me. The fact that you think that there is speaks volumes about you, nothing about me.

        You’re truly a moron. You’re trying to apply Shakespeare’s words about an idiot full of sound and fury to a person stressing the importance of
        logic. Shakespeare would give you a good smack for dragging his good name through the muck of your ignorant idiocy. Shakespeare was a learned man, not a know nothing fraudulent blowhard like you.

      • BB-Mystic

        “Thou art like a toad; ugly and venomous.”
        ~As You Like It

      • mosquito

        As is always the case with your posts, you have got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        The Scriptures describe people like you. It calls them fools. Fools never come to a knowledge of the truth.

      • BB-Mystic

        “Methink’st thou art a general offence and every man should beat thee.”

        ~All’s Well That Ends Well

      • mosquito

        There you go again with nothing, with a bald, unsubstantiated assertion. And, again, you don’t think. You just moronically react.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know without any uncertainty.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never make even a weak attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        There is nothing worthless, pointless, or meaningless about me. My posts in this thread have been eminently intelligent and consummately logical.

        There is nothing new here. Just more of your worthless, pointless, meaningless, empty, moronic, bald, unsubstantiated assertions.

      • mosquito

        I am not worthless, pointless, or meaningless. You’ve got nothing. You’re just making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion, which amounts to nothing.

        Your attempt to use a passage to describe me shows your ignorance. Shakespeare would smack you in the head for dragging his good name through the muck of your moronic ignorance. Shakespeare was an educated man. He certainly understood the significance of logic.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • BB-Mystic

        “A most notable coward, an infinite and endless liar, an hourly promise breaker, the owner of no one good quality.”
        ~All’s Well That Ends Well

      • mosquito

        As always, you’ve got absolutely nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • BB-Mystic

        “Thy tongue outvenoms all the worms of Nile.”

        ~Cymbeline

      • mosquito

        This is nothing new. After all, bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know without any reservation.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        Like all of your posts, without exception, you’ve got nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • mosquito

        As with all of your posts, without exception, you’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • mosquito

        Well, there’s nothing new here. Just a bald, unsubstantiated assertion which amounts to nothing.

      • mosquito

        There is nothing new here. Just another bald, unsubstantiated assertion, which amounts to nothing.

      • mosquito

        This is not surprising. Just more of the same, bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know for sure.

        That is why you never make an attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • GenerallyConfused

        I’m still trying to figure out why the assertions have no covering or hair.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite childish. An assertion being bare has absolutely nothing to do with head coverings.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        So, why do you waste your time writing stuff that has no significance whatsoever?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. What I am writing is most definitely significant. You’ve been served. You just are blissfully ignorant of this fact.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Stop carrying on. What you’ve written is a string of nothing.

      • mosquito

        You wrote: “Since this is a progressive site, not a Christian one, it doesn’t matter a “hill of beans” what Scripture says.” You are quite illogical and, hence, moronic. Your premise does not imply your conclusion.

      • BB-Mystic

        Dudelet! You’re still repeating yourself, and thus spinning your wheels! We’ve already established that. Tell me something I don’t know! I’m not going to change what I say or how I say it just because you hurl boring meaningless white-noise insults at me. How’s that vocabulary expansion coming along?

        By the way, have you called or e-mailed Giankeys yet, Mr. Unproven Logician? We wait for proof of your actual academic existence with bated breath!

      • You’re deeply confused. Saying the same thing in a different context for a different reason is not repeating oneself. I am doing no spinning of wheels. My posts in this thread have been eminently intelligent and carefully crafted.
        Any competent logician and professor of English can confirm this fact.

        You have not established anything. Making bald, unsubstantiated assertions and erecting straw men establishes absolutely nothing. And that is all that you have done in response to me.

        If you believe that what I am saying is meaningless, then that demonstrates what a moron you are. As my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in their mouth.

        Yes, I called gian keys this morning and confirmed for him that mosquito and John D. McCarthy are the same person.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Forget talking. You’re not saying anything.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        It doesn’t matter a hill of beans whether you need or want my service or my logic. I’m not serving blowhards like you. I’m serving those who will see, by my posts, that people like you are blowhards.

        You are very big on bald, unsubstantiated assertions. They amount to nothing. You’re accomplishing absolutely nothing by making them.

        You’re obviously not doing a good job of taking care of your intelligence.

        I have no deluded opinions or fack facts. And, all that you have, is empty, bald, unsubstantiated opinions. That is to say, all that you have is nothing.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        would that be ‘scripture’ from a book fraught with contradictions and dripping with misogynistic references; whilst TRYING to tell us about some land locked old buzzard who almost immediately went to antartica/Australia/ north AND south America/ artic circle and collected (peaceably) all the animals ,,,,,and after having them stink up his boats and NOT eat each other this NOAH flock now WENT BACK TO ALL THOSE LANDS and safely re-deposited the homesick animals and plants?
        ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, that BOOK?
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, about that JONAH fishfood guy–

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing. Give it up. You could not construct a valid logical argument if your life depended upon it. Your illogic is also revealed by the fact that you have erected a straw man. Erecting straw men is one of the most basic logical mistakes. Give it up. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        OOOOOPS—
        u didn’t answer the inquiry I placed above
        __________________________________________
        besides; Im more of a tin man anyway-
        as u are the cowardly “lyin”

      • mosquito

        You’re hopelessly deluded. There is nothing cowardly about going up against a coterie of morons who attack me at every opportunity. Try it some time and see how you like it. And there is nothing lyin’ about eminently logical reasoning.

        And, you’re very confused. I responded to your inquiry. I pointed out that it is a straw man. Hence, there is absolutely no need for me to answer the questions in this inquiry. Perhaps, you are too moronic to understand that basic fact of logic.

      • mosquito

        Thanks for proving, definitively, that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        There is nothing cowardly about standing up to two prime examples of white trash. And, I cannot have lied about anything which I have posted in this thread, since I proved everything which I posted in this thread.

      • mosquito

        Thanks for making life easy for me and going right ahead and proving, all by yourself, that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never substantiate anything you post.

      • GenerallyConfused

        If the only thing you have to say against someone is how they are using words in a sentence, that says more about you than the original poster. I find it interesting that while you attack his word usage, you say nothing about the content in said post.

        I wonder why it is that you are only attacking the only thing you can.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        easy 2 answer- lemme ‘ help ya:
        MOSQUITO’s are boneless (spineless) suckers of bodily fluids. They are useless other than being food for zoophytes.
        I do hope that my impeccable description will help us all understand HIS personal esteem issues
        ======================================
        please feel free 2 find and read my comments to the encephalitis carrier in which U inquired of above.

      • GenerallyConfused

        I was going for the kill ‘Em with kindness approach. Seems to work for most of the perpetually angry crowd.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        a mix of that and un-reproachable intellect usually silences them after their short intermission of diminishing recalcitrance—

      • You’re severely learning disabled. The period after a short intermission of diminishing recalcitrance would be, perhaps, the worst time to expect to silence “them”.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        according to whom? some loser cretin mental case who runs around the campus he teaches at to the point he is arrested for that “logical” act of self humiliation? oct 2012 michigan state university john mccarthy nude run and handcuffed arrest
        ======================================

      • mosquito

        That judgment is according to an internationally renowned Professor of Mathematics with published proofs of his original mathematical theorems, published in some of the best mathematical journals in the world, of whom one of his colleagues, an internationally renowned mathematician, who once gave a seminal address at the World Council of Mathematicians, said that I was the most logical person he had ever met. A mental breakdown from which I am recovered detracts in no way from that stellar reputation, despite your bigoted opinion.

      • That judgment is according to an internationally renowned Professor of Mathematics with published proofs of his original mathematical theorems, published in some of the best mathematical journals in the world, of whom one of his colleagues, an internationally renowned mathematician, who once gave a seminal address at the International Congress of Mathematicians, said that I was the most logical person he had ever met. A mental
        breakdown from which I am recovered detracts in no way from that stellar reputation, despite your bigoted opinion.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        would that “renowned” professor be also RENOWNED for going beserk in this classroom full of students and underscoring his logical actions by running fully NUDE ( C’ept those matching argyle socks) so logically that he was handcuffed and taken to a “hospital” because he was so “renowned” that they had to make certain he didn’t blow another logical fuse and start hurting himself–or others???
        would that “renowned” idiot be the smallish yet fat stomached loser in the photo which “graces” my profile?
        I like the self titled ” recovered” from your Michael clayton ‘Arthur edens’ nudity rampage —
        here is a logical premise worthy of your ( limited to) mathematical stellar reputation:
        ..anyone who starts screaming and slamming his hands and head into a CLOSED window whilst accompanying that “lucidity” with undressing in a HUGE school fraught with aghast students most certainly does NOT have the LOGICAL ability to claim recovery from such an inept display of an atrabilious social presage ( towards further acts of verifiable insanity)
        your quotidian logomachies here upon these threads offer sterling logical proof that U indeed are insane.
        =======================================
        and,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,if U are so “gifted ” at math/numbers/ ET HOC GENUS OMNE then I give U this riddle:
        tell me how this can be accomplished:
        ( NOTE- its a baseball pitchers line in a boxscore)
        ********************************************************
        IP,,,,,,,,,H,,,,,,,,,R,,,,,,,,,ER,,,,,,,,,
        1/3…….7……….0……….0………..
        ^^^^^^ EXPLAIN HOW THIS ABOVE IS POSSIBLE^^^^^
        UNTIL u CAN EXPLAIN THIS– and it IS possible; I do not consider U ” recovered”
        (NOTE2: my most recent sentence IS totally illogical; but FUN!!)

      • You’re totally illogical. Your premises never imply your conclusions.

        Also, you’re totally illogical, because you raised a straw man.

        These are two of the most basic logical errors. So, you are totally inept at logic. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic.

        By the way, I am not the one who determined that I have recovered. My doctors determined that.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        (a) funny how U repied strenuously to a ” strawman” topic– isn’t that similar to swatting at a spectre?
        (b) the doctors who U PAID?? Hmmmmmm,,,,,
        (c) U didn’t show me your mathematical ‘brilliance” by conquering the baseball problem ( box score) presented,,,,,,,
        I will show some mercy here by saying this—
        NO ONE has ever gotten it; even so-called experts I have given it to
        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
        so– I will give U a hint ( not much; but needed)
        here is the hint below—
        *
        _______________________________________
        an asterisk isn’t much of a hint but when I tell u how it is possible even u will crack a shortlived smile and place said baseball funfact in thy repertoire!!!
        contrary to our crazed posts 2 each other,,,,,,,,,im kinda on your side!!

      • mosquito

        (a) No, it’s not like swatting at a spectre. It’s refuting your argument definitively.

        (b) Thanks for proving that you are a sleezeball.

        (c) This is irrelevant to our discussion.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        again misspelled sleazeball
        ==================================
        and evidently cannot figure the riddle out; thus showing a paucity of intellect
        ===================================
        I enjoy mangling you– it allows the others on this thread to laugh at you ( logically of course)

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Urban Dictionary: sleezeball

        Your logic is atrocious. My not posting a solution to your riddle says absolutely nothing about whether I can solve the riddle. Yet, you, like the moron that you are, claim that I evidently cannot figure the riddle out. Dad hasn’t mowed the lawn for the last few weeks. He evidently doesn’t know how to mow the lawn. My God, are you stupid.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve demonstrated that you are a slimy sleezeball.

      • Nemisis

        Not that gnat.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you so clearly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you clearly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’re a pathetic individual gian keys. Mocking me accomplishes absolutely nothing but to give you an opportunity to prove what an asshole you are. Scripturally speaking, the mocker is one of the most vile of persons on this earth. That fits you quite well.

      • You’ve made my life a lot easier by proving, all by yourself, that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • mosquito

        You’re thoroughly illogical. You have no proof that I am “only attacking the only thing” I can. You are just mindlessly making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion that I am doing that. Such assertions amount to nothing. So, you’ve contributed nothing to this conversation by that assertion.

        Criticizing someone’s use of the English language is highly significant. Only a moron who has know regard for the beauty of the English language would find it insignificant or even petty for someone to criticize someone who butchers the English language. Certainly my doing this says a lot about me. It says that I am a man of eminent discernment. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people like you, of whom my mother would say, some people’s taste is all in their mouth.

      • BB-Mystic

        *flagged for being an egomanical logic-troll who thinks its opinion matters*

      • You’ve got nothing, BB-Mystic. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • BB-Mystic

        And?

        *flagged for being a pompous ass who trolls while wearing nothing but socks*

      • Why are you so enamored of proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • BB-Mystic

        The only thing that’s being “proven” here is that you are a pompous, trollish ass.

        You also never answered my question. Did Allen Clifton give you permission to troll here? If not, who appointed you the thread police?

        *flagged for being an idiot*

      • You’re hopelessly self-deluded. I have proven every single statement that I have made in this thread. Any competent logician can confirm this fact.

        I am not trolling. I am exposing fraudulent blowhards, like yourself.

      • GenerallyConfused

        Actually, the English language is a bastardization of latin, spanish, german, and greek. Obviously my pointing out, in a rather polite way, that if that is the only thing you had to say why say it struck a nerve with you.

        We as the English speakers of this country seem to think that other languages are beneath us, even though there are much prettier and easier languages to learn and conjugate. French, spanish, heck – even Japanese, are all much prettier languages to learn and speak. But you are free to think what you wish to think.

        I’m wondering, though, exactly where is any of my post illogical? I was simply pointing out something about your post and continuing what you posted. Are people not allowed to point such things out?

      • Nemisis

        Dude doesn’t know the difference between “Know” and “No” and gives you shit for “poor” English while demonstrating his own poor English.

        Irony and Karma all at once.

      • GenerallyConfused

        Well, knowing the history of English as a language is beneficial for anyone that actually thinks it is beautiful… but that is with anything.

      • Nemisis

        Agreed.

      • Since I have previously proven that you are a moron, a fraud and a liar, your opinion on anything is worthless and untrustworthy.

      • Nemisis

        The only thing you have proven is that you like the word moron.
        It appears in most of your posts. That much fixation on a single word implies that you want to either marry the word or just have carnal knowledge, excuse me, “Noledge” with the word. Freud would say that is due to your penis envy of your mother, the Gibbon from the Zoo.

      • You’ve accomplished absolutely nothing by this post accept to prove that you are an utterly despicable person. Thanks for saving me the trouble of doing this myself.

      • Nemisis

        I have never claimed to be anything beyond that. What is your point? Oh, yeah your head. Face it. You blew it. You trolled hard and sucked harder.

      • mosquito

        You are so incredibly narcissistic. It does not matter a hill of beans what you claimed. Since you are a moron, a fraud, and a liar, your opinion about anything is worthless and untrustworthy. Why are you asking me what is my point? I made my point exceedingly clear.

      • Nemisis

        So my not claiming anything doesn’t matter.
        Finally we agree on that. Now, what we are, and have been, discussing is your claims and lack of proof.

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious. Your statement that “I have never claimed anything beyond that.” speaks about claiming something, not just about not claiming something. You don’t even understand your own statements. That’s how stupid you are.

        Your hopelessly confused. We have not been discussing my lack of proof. I don’t have any lack of proof to discuss.

      • Nemisis

        Are you really that fucking dense?
        Don’t answer that, it was rhetorical.
        Word problems….such a waste.

      • mosquito

        Apparently, your reading comprehension is abysmal. What is it that you don’t understand about my post?

      • How pitiable a state in which you find yourself, addicted to the superstition of word magic.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your post does not just involve not claiming something, it also involves claiming something.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know without a doubt.

        That is why you never even make the smallest attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I’ve already made my point.

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your assertions.

      • You obviously don’t know anything about psychology or the human anatomy. Every time you venture into a subject to show us all that you know something about it you prove that you have not got a clue about it. That is why it is most definitely true that you are a fraudulent blowhard.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Don’t venture into psychology. You have not got a clue about psychology. After all, your assertions about it are gibberish.

        You’ve got nothing, as you know without any doubt.

        That is why you never even make the smallest attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        I donnnnn’ see anyone on this thread who will agree with your ” assertion” that U have proven that anyone ( sans mosquito) is a moron
        ======================================
        then again,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the fact that U overuse words ( battology par excellence) 2 such a degree does give credence to your remarkable ( egregious?) consistency
        =====================================
        ” please continue; governor”

      • mosquito

        You’re quite illogical. Once again, you raise a straw man. Whether an argument is a proof is not decided by polling an audience. Any competent logician can confirm that all of my arguments in this thread have been proofs.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your logic is abysmal. One does not determine the validity of a proof by taking a poll.

      • You’re deeply confused. Whether English is beautiful is not a subjective issue. It is an objective issue. Anyone who disagrees with the statement that English is beautiful has all their taste in their mouth.

      • You’re full of crap. My English is eminently intelligent as any teacher of English will confirm. I got straight A’s in my English classes. You are just moronically making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion, which amounts to nothing. So, you’ve got nothing.

      • Nemisis

        Meanwhile, you continue to use facts not in evidence as proof. Yeah, I think the entire debating world is laughing it’s collective asses off.

      • You’re a pathological liar. I have not used a single fact in my proofs which is outside the knowledge of those involved in this thread. You’re a complete loser. You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • Nemisis

        “You’re a pathological liar. I have not used a single fact in my proofs ”
        That is the most accurate thing you have ever stated. The rest of your comment is pure bullshit wrapped in more bullshit.

      • You’ve once again proven that you’re a liar. Your quote from me is a complete misrepresentation of what I actually said: “I have not used a single fact in my proofs which is outside the knowledge of those involved in this thread.”.

      • Nemisis

        I did no such thing, I merely stated for the record that that portion of your statement was the only factual part of your entire statement.
        Congrats on your pro suck expansion pak.

      • mosquito

        You’re truly learning disabled. The first ten words of a twenty-one word sentence are not, as you put it, “part of” the “entire statement”. You can’t select out words from a statement and claim that you’ve taken part of that statement.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        The first few words in a long sentence are not “part of the entire statement”. That’s like saying that “I’m never going to go” is part of the statement “I’m never going to go to England.” Obviously, we don’t expect the speaker to deliver on the first sentence, whereas we have no trouble believing the second.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        The first few words of a sentence are not part of the sentence. That’s like saying that “I cannot relieve myself” is part of the sentence “I cannot relieve myself of my duties at work.” The former statement might lead us to give the speaker a laxative. The second would not suggest such a solution to the speakers dilemma.

      • mosquito

        Oh, is that right? The entire debating world is laughing it is collective asses off. What the hell does that mean?

      • Nemisis

        You said you were smart. Having word problems?

      • Like I said, what does this mean: “The entire debating world is laughing it is collective asses off.” That’s what you wrote.

      • Nemisis

        I explained, you fail to understand. Not my problem. Suffer in pain and misery. Maybe I should try some satanic ritual stuff to see if I can get a herd of cattle to pee in your daily grind.

      • mosquito

        Oh, I understand your explanations. They are all bullshit.

      • Nemisis

        “Like I said, what does this mean”

        You stated your ignorance. Own it.

      • mosquito

        Nemisis, you’re hopelessly self-deluded.

        Asking what does this mean about gibberish is not stating one’s ignorance. It’s obviously a rhetorical question, moron.

      • Nemisis

        Rhetorical is not one of your writing traits. My conclusion stands.
        You’re wrong again, on both counts.

      • mosquito

        This is more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • Nemisis

        “Not a single one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands.”

        Indicating the following:
        Collectively, all of my conclusions in all of my replies to you in this thread stand.
        Any single conclusion in this thread posted in reply to others stand.

        Thanks for the clarity.

        Additionally:
        You’re wrong.
        Still wrong.

        You are correct, you have not been wrong just a single time.

        You have been wrong every time.
        You are wrong again.

        Four wrongs do not make a right.
        Neither do four lefts.

      • mosquito

        Like I said, moron, not a single one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands.

        On the other hand, every single one of my responses to you in this thread stands.

        Any competent logician will readily confirm these facts, moron.

      • Nemisis

        these are not facts they are just bad fiction
        ed wood would be saying shit like that is just garbage
        nothing about you stands
        you sit
        in your
        socks handcuffed
        hands covering
        your dividend
        you sob
        you plead
        too late
        you exceed
        your capacity
        to think
        is on
        the brink
        odd or
        even we
        are not
        believing your
        a pale
        shade of
        once mediocre
        now slumped
        and plumped
        universally dumped
        your wit is less
        troubled at best
        wronger than
        wrong
        perhaps
        wrong to
        the
        tenth
        tenth
        tenth
        tenth

        That’s also known as a shit load of wrong ‘cuz you taint rite.

      • mosquito

        Your position is bankrupt.

        You know this is true. That’s why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate what you say.

        You’ve got nothing for reasons which I have previously given.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most undoubtedly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • Thanks for proving that you are a despicable partisan bigot. That saves me some trouble.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most assuredly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • You’re hopelessly confused. You cannot possible have won this debate, since you never substantiated any of your posts. That means that you scored zero points in this debate. I, on the other hand, proved all of my assertions, accumulating several points. It follows that you lost soundly, and I won with flying colors.

      • Nemisis

        Incorrect

      • mosquito

        Not at all. This is more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single
        one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m
        not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in
        this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • mosquito

        No, it’s correct. This is more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single
        one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m
        not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in
        this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • Nemisis

        so what you are saying is any conclusion in this thread that is not a response to you stands as a solid fact

        Hey JMNA you see that nutter mctoady admitted he is a idiot

        Can you see the bait?

      • You’re a moron. A implies B does not imply that not A implies not B. Your logic is atrocious.

      • Nemisis

        A, like B, implies you suck. You are less than nothing, you are anti-something.

      • You’re a moron. A does not imply anything. B does not imply anything. antimatter and matter are not ordered. So, anti-something is not less than nothing. Don’t venture into mathematics or physics. You have not got clue about either.

      • A implies nothing. B implies nothing. Anti-matter and matter are not ordered. So, anti-something is not less than nothing. Nor is nothing less than anti-something.

        Don’t venture into mathematics or physics. You have not got a clue about either.

      • A implies nothing. B implies nothing.

        Anti-matter and matter are not ordered. So, anti-something is not less than nothing. Nor is nothing less than anti-something.

        Don’t venture into mathematics or physics. You don’t have a clue about either.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        A implies nothing. B implies nothing. Anti-matter and matter are not ordered. So, anti-something is not less than nothing, and nothing is not less that anti-something.

        You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        A implies nothing. B implies nothing. Anti-matter and matter are not ordered. So, anti-something is not less than nothing and nothing is not less than anti-something.

        You’ve got nothing, as you very well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’re seriously confused. A implies nothing. B implies nothing. Anti-matter and matter are not ordered. So, anti-something is not less than something, nor is something less than anti-something. You just assert whatever comes into your vacant mind, with no concern for how asinine it is.

      • Your first sentence demonstrates how utterly illogical you are.

        You’ve proven again that you are enslaved to the superstition of word magic. You’re addicted to it. You practice it in just about every, if not every, one of your posts.

        There is no bait to see. Don’t flatter yourself. You are not baiting anyone. You’re too stupid to do that.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing. That is why you have not once in this entire thread, in response to me, tried to substantiate your drivel.

      • Nemisis

        lies

      • You’ve got nothing. That is why you have not once in this entire thread, in response to me, tried to substantiate your drivel.

      • Nemisis

        Ha, predictible little monkey toad. I made you say drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing for reasons previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never try to substantiate your statements.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never try to substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You did not make me say anything, you narcissistic twerp.

      • Once again, you’ve proven yourself to be hopelessly addicted to the superstition of word magic. I don’t lie. I have a sterling reputation of being a man of honesty. This is totally unlike you, a pathological liar.

      • Nemisis

        Follow me all you want , tatter. Just remember that the grown ups are talking. So shut the fuck up. Brat.

      • You’ve got nothing. That is why you have not once in this entire thread, in response to me, tried to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing. That is why you have not once in this entire thread, in response to me, tried to substantiate your drivel.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons which I previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undeniably know.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you very well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’re hopelessly enslaved to the superstition of word magic, to the idea that all it takes to establish an assertion is to assert it.

      • This is more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single
        one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m
        not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in
        this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • Nemisis

        You’ve been wrong every time, not just a single time.

      • This is just more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single
        one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m
        not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in
        this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • This is just more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single
        one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m
        not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in
        this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons that I previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know for sure.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know certainly.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you substantiate not a single one of your posts.

      • Nemisis

        WOOOOOA. Back the bus up.

        You claim to be Mosquito, guest, James D. McCarthy, and jamesfitzgerald.

        Mosquito is a plague carrion blood sucker.
        an unknown guest is typically a not invited and therefore unwanted person.
        James D. McCarthy is a sock only lecturing mathematics professor from MSU.
        James Fitzgerald is a dead mathematics professor formerly of MSU.

        I think I am beginning to see a pattern here…

        Ah yes. There it is. You’re an idiot.
        Everyone knows that your are an idiot.
        Everyone also knows that by you replying to anyone in any manner you are merely confirming that you are an idiot.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As always, you’ve got nothing. That’s why you don’t substantiate your drivel.

        I don’t know of anyone named James D. McCarthy.

        Your logic is atrocious. Being uninvited does not imply that one is unwanted. For instance, uninvited people show up frequently at parties, to the delight of the host that didn’t even know that the uninvited person was in the area.

        I am pretty sure that I am not that dead professor who was formerly at MSU.

        If you’re going to call someone an idiot, then make sure that you’re stupid isn’t showing: “your are an idiot”.

        Your logic is atrocious. Replying to someone in some manner does not confirm that I am an idiot. On the other hand, your replies confirm that you are an idiot, because your replies are idiotic. That’s correct logic, unlike your specious logic.

      • If you are going to call someone an idiot, then make sure that your stupid isn’t showing: “that your are an idiot.”.

        Don’t give me your bullshit about baiting. This has nothing to do with baiting. It’s all due to your stupidity.

        Your last two sentences are patently false, for reasons similar to those I gave in a previous post.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • I made no such claim. You’re making this stuff up as you go along.

        Your illogical. Not being invited does not imply being unwanted. There are plenty of times when an uninvited guest shows up to a party to the delight of the host who never even knew that this uninvited guest was in the area.

        Your last two sentences are patently false. There are any plenty of people who don’t know anything about me. Hence, they certainly don’t believe that I’m an idiot, which I’m not, and they certainly don’t know that by my replying to anyone in any manner I am merely confirming that I am an idiot, which I’m not.

        You believe in word magic, in the idea that by just saying something, you’ve established that it is true. This makes you certifiably insane.

      • You believe in word magic, in the idea that if you assert something, then you have established it.

      • No, I have been right every single time in this thread and you have been wrong every single time in this thread.

      • Nemisis

        You’re mistaken.

      • This is more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single
        one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m
        not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in
        this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • This is more of your bullshit. You’re a pathological liar. Not a single
        one of your conclusions in this thread, in response to me, stands. I’m
        not wrong again. I’m right again. I have not been wrong a single time in
        this thread. That’s an incontrovertible fact.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you have yet to substantiate anything you have posted.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons which are previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most assuredly know.

        That is why you don’t ever try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • No, as I have always been in this thread, I am right. You, as always in this thread, are wrong.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, it’s definitely correct.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • Once again, you’ve shown, in a way that cannot be denied, that you are hopelessly chained to word magic.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, rhetorical is not one of my writing traits. Indeed, it’s not anybody’s trait. Indeed, it’s not a trait. Why not? Because, a trait is a noun, and rhetorical is an adjective.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, rhetorical is not one of my writing traits. Indeed, it’s not anyone’s writing traits. Indeed, it’s not a trait. Why not? Because, a trait is a noun, and rhetorical is an adjective.

        So, you’re wrong again. You’ve got a perfect record for being wrong. We can go back through the record and check that you’ve said something wrong on every single one of your posts in response to me.

      • Your stupid is showing. My question is clearly rhetorical, as plain as the palm of your hand. Your conclusion falls in no uncertain terms.

      • You’re right. Rhetorical is not one of my writing traits. Indeed, it is not anybody’s writing trait. Indeed, it’s not a trait. Why not? Because, trait is a noun and rhetorical is an adjective.

        You’re wrong again, on all counts, as you have been with every single one of your posts in this thread in response to me.

      • Rhetorical is definitely not one of my writing traits. Indeed, it is not anyone’s writing traits. Indeed, it’s not a writing trait. Indeed, it is not a trait. Why not? Because, trait is a noun and rhetorical is an adjective.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re confused. I did not state my ignorance. Asking “What does this mean?” about gibberish is not stating one’s ignorance. It is a rhetorical question, with an obvious answer; namely, it doesn’t mean anything, it’s gibberish.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re confused. Saying “what does it mean” about gibberish is not stating one’s ignorance.

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Your logic is atrocious. Pointing out gibberish is not stating one’s ignorance. Saying “What does this mean?” in that context is clearly rhetorical.

      • Your logic is atrocious. Asking “What does this mean?” about gibberish is not stating one’s ignorance. It is clearly a rhetorical question pointing to the fact that the gibberish is gibberish.

      • Exposing gibberish, via a rhetorical question: “What does this mean?”, is not stating one’s ignorance.

      • I have not failed to understand anything. I have merely pointed out your gibberish. Pointing out someone’s gibberish is not failing to understand.

      • Nemisis

        You clearly asked a question, you were not pointing at anything.
        Unless you truly are mccarthy, then your were pointing at the ground.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. Questions can point out things. For instance, the question “What’s that over there?” points out that there is something “over there”. My question drew attention to your gibberish. That is to say, it pointed out your gibberish.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I have not failed to understand anything. I have merely pointed out your
        stupid gibberish. Pointing out someone’s gibberish is not failing to
        understand.

      • The question was clearly rhetorical. And you know it. You’re just throwing a childish temper tantrum, because you’ve been totally “skunked” in this debate.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Like I said, what does this statement mean: “The entire debating world is laughing it is collective asses off.” That’s what you wrote.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I fully understood what you wrote. I was merely pointing out that it was gibberish.

      • I understood very well what you said. It’s just that it is gibberish, as I made clear when I made reference to your error.

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded. Anyone who is malicious has a definite problem, a very serious problem. You’ll find out soon enough what a problem you have because you’ve been malicious towards me. Your explanation is sheer fantasy, there is not a word of truth in it.

      • My posts in this thread make it abundantly clear that I am extremely smart. You’re addicted to word magic, which makes you quite dumb.

      • Stephen Barlow

        Hey Rubber stamp Fitzgerald!! You type the same garbage to EVERYBODY!!! Yada yada nada! What’s painful is being humiliated in the only safe place you thought you had. You only have ONE response to EVERYTHING. You psychopathetic genderless robot.

        You’ve obviously got nothing. Post after post, you give a string of bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which amount to nothing. Such assertions are inadmissible, since you did not substantiate them. So, you have yet to contribute anything to the discussion….

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        straight A’s in ‘english’…………….straight A’s in attendance ,,,,,, straight A’s in penmanship,,,, straight A’s in mathematics………….. straight A’s in literature,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        =========================================
        then,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, his mommie looked at his corpulent/napiform yet ectomorphic physique and the “F” he achieved (??) gym class.
        Thus,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, his spreading his immutable personal angst outward to the rest of humanity.
        =====================================
        even the daily begging( see: prayer) to the long dead homosexual jewish carpenter/fisherman JEEEESUS could NOT overcome the DNA-lacking inferior genetics spawned and confirmed by his “birth” certificate.

        His keen observation of and cerebral mirroring towards gracile macromastial women further infused his long held “scripturally” dogma (Q.V.) that he , indeed, has never had and never WILL taste the sweet succulence of a TRULY anatomically pleasing woman.
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        Thelyphthoricly bereft he remains ; ad infinitum !

      • mosquito

        Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

        You’ve got absolutely nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

        You write “”scripturally” dogma”. My God, you are a moron. The word “scripturally” is an adverb, as our words ending in “ly”. So, it modifies verbs, not nouns, like dogma. Don’t venture into English. You have not got a clue about English. Memorizing words does not constitute understanding English.

      • mosquito

        Gym was an extracurricular activity. Grades were strictly for courses which were part of the curriculum, not for extracurricular activities. So, my mother could not have been looking at my gym grade, since there was no such thing. You’re making this stuff up as you go along. That’s not surprising, since you are a pathological liar.

        You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        wrong answer eimstein: GYM class does get graded in both private schools and public school at LEAST until the 8th grade,,,,,and here in FLORIDA ( S.E. FLORIDA/ BROWRD COUNTRY) GYM got graded every quarter
        ======================================
        and,,, as we have seen your corpulent yet painfully ectomorphic “physique” in the photo of U NUDE whiule arrested in MSU school campus we can logically assume that U sucked at anything outdoors.

      • You’re quite the moron. I doubt very much that you were in school when I was. And it certainly doesn’t matter at all how things are done there in Florida.

        Your logic is atrocious. There is absolutely no reason to think that my physique, while I was in school, was anything like it is now. You are truly a moron. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about how to construct a logical argument.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        we were both in high school in the early / mid 70’s
        so– U erred ( again) logically of course
        *****************************************************
        (A) prove to me that gym was NOT a graded course in the state U polluted while in high school
        (B)

      • You have not got a clue about logic. There was no logic involved in my assumption that you were still wet behind the years. It was a fully reasonable assumption on which to proceed, given your childish behavior.

        Don’t issue ultimatums to me, you twerp.

        I ran track as a freshman and played tennis my senior year of high school and freshman year of college. My nickname, mosquito, was given to me in junior high because of how fast I ran.

        You’re a complete moron about logic. There is nothing logical about a picture. A picture has nothing whatsoever to do with logic. The fact that you think that it does demonstrates that you are a moron when it comes to logic.

        You’re totally self deluded. My energy on this thread is not at all gravitated towards you.

        You’re totally self deluded. You have never raised my ire at all. I am and have been perfectly content throughout my participation in this thread.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite confused. I did not err. Saying that I doubt very much that you were in school when I was is not an error. It’s a true statement. I did doubt this very much. You’re dumb as a doorknob.

        I ran track as a freshman in high school. I played tennis as a senior in high school and a freshman in undergraduate college. My nickname, mosquito, was given to me in junior high because of how fast I was.

        You’re quite confused. Logic has absolutely nothing to do with a photo. The fact that you think that it does demonstrates that you are a moron when it comes to logic.

        All my energy here is not gravitated towards you. Your statement that it is just reveals how narcissistic you are.

        You have never raised my ire during my participation in this thread. I have been perfectly o content throughout my participation in this thread.

      • mosquito

        You have not got a clue about logic. There was no logic involved in my assumption that you were still wet behind the ears. It was a fully reasonable assumption on which to proceed, given your childish behavior.

        Don’t issue ultimatums to me, you twerp.

        I ran track as a freshman and played tennis my senior year of high school and freshman year of college. My nickname, mosquito, was given to me in junior high because of how fast I ran.

        You’re a complete moron about logic. There is nothing logical about a picture. A picture has
        nothing whatsoever to do with logic. The fact that you think that it does demonstrates that you are a moron when it comes to logic.

        You’re totally self deluded. My energy on this thread is not at all gravitated towards you.

        You’re totally self deluded. You have never raised my ire at all throughout my participation in this thread. I am and have been perfectly content throughout my participation in this thread.

      • Your logic is abysmal. I said that I doubt very much that

        you were in school when I was. That’s not an error. That’s a true statement. I did doubt that.

        I ran track as a freshman in high school. I played on the tennis team when I was a senior in high school and a freshman in undergraduate college.

        Photos have absolutely nothing to do with logic.

        I am not spending all my energy here on you.

        You have not raised my ire on this thread at all. I have been perfectly content throughout my participation in this thread.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        excellent!!! then we continue to keep thy logical content VISAVIS your participation?
        ======================================
        tennis anyone???

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. The fact that I did not prove that gym was not a graded class when I was in school does not follow from logic at all. The fact that you think that it does demonstrates that you are a moron.

        Your logic is atrocious. Your photo is not logical proof that insanity is my MAGNA CARTA. Your photo does not even prove that I was ever insane. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic.

        That’s correct. Photos have nothing to do with logic. Anyone can doctor a photo. You cannot doctor a logical argument.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite illogical. The fact that I did not provide proof that gym was not a graded class when I was in high school does not follow from any logical argument.

        You’re quite illogical. Your photo is not logical proof that insanity is my MAGNA CARTA. It isn’t even logical proof that I was ever insane.

        That’s correct. Photos have nothing to do with logic. Anyone can doctor a photo. You cannot doctor a logical argument.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        do U dare imply that the “chap” seated by those uniformed police in that photo is ( a) not you ( b) a ‘doctored’ photo???
        +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
        bytheway————– your limited attacks upon all the inhabitants of these threads does NOT help show that U are sane
        ===================================
        c’ept me of course; cause I luv ya!

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know undoubtedly.

        That is why you never even make the smallest attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite illogical. The fact that I did not provide a proof that gym was not a graded class when I was in high school is not proven by any logical argument.

        You’re quite illogical. Your photo is not logical proof that insanity is my Magna Carta. It is not even proof that I was ever insane.

        That’s correct. Photos have nothing to do with proofs. Anyone can doctor a photo. You cannot doctor a proof.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know for sure.

        That is why you never even make the smallest attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate any one of your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your logic is atrocious. The fact that I wrote “Know” instead of “No” or “No” instead of “Know”, in no way, shape, or form implies that I don’t know the difference between “Know” and “No”. Your arguing that it does demonstrates that your hold upon logic is abysmal.

      • Nonsense, the English language is not a “bastardization” of anything.

        Your pointing that out demonstrates that your discernment is sadly lacking. This did not strike a nerve with me. It simply gave me further fodder for demonstrating that you are an intellectual pygmy.

        The fact that there are prettier languages than English is totally irrelevant to my statement about English. The fact that you think that this is relevant to that statement demonstrates that you have an abysmal hold upon logic.

        Why are you asking where your post is illogical? I told you where it is illogical. Here is my explanation again: “You’re thoroughly illogical. You have no proof that I am “only attacking the only thing” I can. You are just mindlessly making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion that I am doing that. Such assertions amount to nothing. So, you’ve contributed nothing to this conversation by that
        assertion.”

        Making a bald, unsubstantiated assertion is illogical. It is a violation of one of the most basic rules of logic and is, hence, illogical (i.e. contrary to logic).

      • Nemisis

        Actually….there is your entire history of posts available for all to see.

        Come one. Come all. See the little monkey dance.
        Click on the name, see the posts.

        What a fine little troll he makes.

      • Yes, and what this history proves is that you are a moron, a fraud and a liar and I am an eminently intelligent, consummately logical person.

      • Nemisis

        It proves your a trollish little monkey.

      • What was it you were trying to say about my a trollish little monkey (i.e. your a trollish little monkey)?

      • Nemisis

        See. Baited again. You can’t help it.
        Your are a completely predictable little monkey.

        and

      • mosquito

        You’re not baiting me and you’re not predicting my responses. You are just saying that you are doing that in a futile attempt to save your face. It’s not working.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re not baiting anyone. You’re too stupid to be able to bait anyone.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • No, it proves no such thing. Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • Nemisis

        Why are you a complete idiot?

      • mosquito

        You are hopelessly self deluded. I am an eminently intelligent man.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got zero, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you don’t ever substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        It proves you suck donkey nuggets pole first.

      • mosquito

        No, it definitely proves that you are a moron, a fraud and a liar and I am an eminently intelligent, consummately logical person.

      • Nemisis

        I’m going with the donkey theory on this one.
        I’m thinking of getting PETA involved since you insist on castrating donkeys orally.

      • Why are you so intent on proving that you are a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your embarrassingly childish. Your response to me is at the level of a child who tells his classmate, who did better than him on a test, that he has “poopy pants”.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you surely know.

        That is why you never substantiate what you post.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        This is the sort of philistine pig ignorance i’ve come to expect from you non-creative garbage.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • GenerallyConfused

        Really? Please tell me where the English language comes from, then. And as far as my “bald” assertions, what does my assertions not having covering or hair have to do with anything?

        You are avoiding my question, though. Where, exactly, is my post to you illogical? Please point the illogical points.

      • mosquito

        Where the English language comes from is irrelevant to the question of whether or not it is a “bastardization”. So, your attempt to best me on this one is a straw man. Erecting a straw man is illogical. So, you’re illogical.

        You’re childish. An assertion being bald has absolutely nothing to do with hair or any other covering of the head.

        I did not avoid your question. I was quite specific about where you were illogical.

      • GenerallyConfused

        First, while I am very glad you think I was trying to best you, I was doing no such thing. Second, I simply looked up the meaning of bald and found that it in no way was a word used for how you have been inclined to use it, repeatedly.

        Second, speaking the something over and over doesn’t make it true. Your usage of specific phrases in all of your posts I have seen on this thread have been repetitive and, quite frankly, tiresome. You may want to come up with better, more cognizant replies.

        If you truly believe that English is the most beautiful language ever used by a human, perhaps you should know the history of it. And perhaps you should realize

      • mosquito

        Your first paragraph indicates that your reading comprehension is abysmal. I am using the phrase bald assertion precisely as it is defined. If you looked up the word bald, then you’re obviously a moron. An assertion is not called bald because it has something to do with standard usages of the term bald.

        You’re quite illogical. You’ve raised a straw man, the doing of which is one of the most basic of logical errors. I never claimed that repeating something over and over made it true. My claim about my arguments has been consistent throughout this thread. That is, any competent logician can confirm that my arguments are proofs.

        You’re a moron. I never said anything that comes even close to saying that English is the most beautiful language ever used by a human. Your suggesting that I said such a thing or believe such a thing demonstrates that you are a liar, with no regard for the truth.

        You are obstinately incorrigible. The English language is most definitely not a “bastardization” of other languages.

        You are entirely wrong. I was very specific about where you were illogical. If you missed it, that’s not due to my explanation. It’s due to your abysmal reading comprehension.

        Your logic is abysmal. Nothing which I have written in this thread implies that I am trying to get any reaction out of you. Yet, you “conclude” that I am. This shows that you have an abysmal hold upon logic.

      • GenerallyConfused

        If you say so. You still need to learn your English language history.
        And again, I still have not called you any names.

      • mosquito

        You’re obstinately incorrigible. I’ve never claimed that my assertions are true because I say so. My argument about my proofs has been consistent. Namely, any competent logician can confirm that my arguments are proof. If you disagree with this, then go right ahead and refute my arguments. Your bald assertion that my arguments are not proofs is empty, as are all bald assertions.

        I don’t need to learn my English language history. Your bald, unsubstantiated assertion that English is a bastardization of other languages is worthless, as are all bald, unsubstantiated assertions.

        Again, I have not involved myself in the childish game of name calling. If I prove that someone is a moron and then say that he is a moron, that is not playing the childish game of name calling. That is just appealing to an established fact.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re quite childish with your “If you say so.” It’s about as mature as putting your fingers in your ears and saying “I can’t hear you.”. I need know English language history lessons. You’re making your English history up out of thin air. I also have not played the childish game of name calling, as I have explained earlier.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Well, you did not look very far. My usage of bald assertion appears in the fourth definition of bald, in an example sentence.

        I have never acted as if speaking something over and over again makes it true. I have established an assertion and then used it subsequently. That is one of the reasons for establishing an assertion, so that you can use it later on in arguments.

        You’re obstinately incorrigible. English is definitely not a bastardization of other languages. Perhaps, you simply don’t know what it means to say that something is a bastardization of other things.

        You’re absolutely wrong. I was definitely specific about where you were illogical. It went like this. I said that you were illogical. And then I immediately described something that you did that was illogical.

        You’re quite illogical. I have never tried to get any reaction out of you. I really don’t care a tinker’s cuss what is your reaction to what I’m writing. Your reaction to my argument is totally irrelevant to my argument.

      • GenerallyConfused

        By the way, you haven’t answered any question posed to you from my initial response. Shall I not hold my breath?

        Please, don’t worry yourself with answering. I have already figured it out for myself. Cheers.

      • mosquito

        You’re seriously confused. I responded to all your questions. If any of your questions involved a straw man, I pointed that out and am, hence, under no obligation to respond to those questions as they are wrapped up in illogic.

      • GenerallyConfused

        Again, If you say so. Then again, you keep resorting to name calling, which I have not done. Cheers.

        May you get all the happiness you deserve.

      • mosquito

        You’re quite illogical. Something isn’t true because I say it is true. I’ve never claimed that something is true because I say it is true. I have proven my assertions, as any competent logician can confirm. You’re being quite childish to mock me with “if you say so”. If you disagree that I have proven my assertions, then go right ahead and refute my arguments. Your bald assertion that I have not proven my assertions is empty, as are all bald assertions.

        You’re quite confused. I have never involved myself in the childish game of name calling. If I have proven that someone is a moron and then say that he is a moron, that is not playing the childish game of name calling.

      • GenerallyConfused

        Not name calling? You have no proven anything by calling every single person who dared day something to you childish, a moron and (quite ineptly, so) illogical. There is no proof of such except they dared to disagree with you and call you on it. You can keep calling me and every other person those things, but if you are going to do that you have to follow up with some iota of proof. Sorry, but you have yet to do that, no matter what your little mind tells you. If everyone around you is a problem, perhaps it isn’t them.

        Again, and I’m going to take a wild stab in the dark here, but I’m childish and illogical and a moron….right? Whatever. This was funny to watch you keep failing to prove your little point but now you’re just being repetitive.

        One more time, may you get all the happiness you deserve. Have a great life. Cheers.

      • mosquito

        I have already explained that I have not been involved in the childish game of name calling. Is there something that you don’t understand about my explanation?

        My position on my proofs has been consistent. Namely, any competent logician can confirm that my arguments are proof. If you do not agree with this, then go right ahead and try to refute my arguments.

        I did not just say that people were being illogical. I proved that they were being illogical by pointing out there illogical behavior. For instance, I repeatedly pointed out that they were making bald, unsubstantiated assertions, which is one of the most basic of logical areas. The fact that they did this is obvious from the fact that they simply asserted their assertions without making even a feeble attempt at substantiating these assertions.

        I have followed up with much more that an iota of proof. Again, if you disagree with this, then go right ahead and try to refute my arguments.

        You’re hopelessly self deluded. I have succeeded in proving my assertions. Again, if you disagree with this, then go right ahead and try to refute my arguments.

      • GenerallyConfused

        No, you haven’t and calling me deluded and every other word in your small arsenal of a vocabulary doesn’t make that true either.

        Have a great life.

      • mosquito

        I have previously explained that I have not been involved in the childish
        game of name calling. Is there something that you don’t understand about
        my explanation?

        My position on my proofs has been consistent. Namely, any competent
        logician can confirm that my arguments are proof. If you do not agree
        with this, then go right ahead and try to refute my arguments.

        I did not just say that people were being illogical. I proved that
        they were being illogical by pointing out their illogical behavior. For
        instance, I repeatedly pointed out that they were making bald,
        unsubstantiated assertions, which is one of the most basic of logical
        errors. The fact that they did this is obvious from the fact that they
        simply asserted their assertions without making even a feeble attempt at
        substantiating these assertions.

        I have followed up with much
        more than an iota of proof. Again, if you disagree with this, then go
        right ahead and try to refute my arguments.

        You’re hopelessly self
        deluded. I have succeeded in proving my assertions. Again, if you
        disagree with this, then go right ahead and try to refute my arguments.

      • mosquito

        Give it up, GenerallyConfused. You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing. You could not construct a valid logical argument if your life depended upon it. You’ve lost this argument a long time ago. That’s an objective fact that any competent logician can confirm. If you disagree with it, then go right ahead and try to refute my arguments. I’ve issued this challenge to you several times and you’ve evaded it. That’s because, as I said, you’ve got nothing. You’re a mealy mouthed coward.

      • GenerallyConfused

        It is BOLD not BALD. Jeeze, take a bloody English class. You sound like a bloody broken record.

      • mosquito

        The reason why I am repeating “bald, unsubstantiated assertions” is because you and others in this thread never learn from your mistakes. You just keep making bald, unsubstantiated assertions over and over again.

        There is no such thing as infinitesimally limited existence. Infinitesimals don’t limit anything.

        I never claimed to have a remarkable vocabulary. You are making stuff up as you go along.

        I am not trying to get the last word in. I am just exercising my right to defend myself against spurious charges.

      • GenerallyConfused

        Are you going to keep going on, trying to defend your stance of something here? Considering that you and I could keep going on and on with this subject and get absolutely nowhere, you aren’t going to see anything from my side. You are one of those people that can’t stand to be proven wrong and will argue until he is blue in the face even when he is wrong.

        Anyone that has read these entries can, in fact, tell that by reading your egregious replies. They can even see, in your own words, the unsubstantiated assertions that you, yourself, repeat on a consistent basis. Perhaps of you had more of an comprehensible reply, perhaps more people would understand your point.

        One last time, have a good life. May you obtain all the happiness and joy you deserve. I bear you no ill will, nor do I wish you any harm in this life. Cheers.

      • mosquito

        There is nothing to see from your side. Strings of bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

        I am not at all one of those type of people. I have a strong reputation of being one of the first people to admit I’m wrong when I’m wrong. But, I am not wrong here and cannot be wrong here because I proved my assertions. That makes me right. Indeed, that makes me irrefutably right. Any competent logician can confirm that my arguments are proofs. Your opinion to the contrary is worthless since it is just a bald, unsubstantiated assertion. If you disagree that my arguments are proofs, then go ahead and refute them. I’ve issued this challenge to you several times and you just evade it. There is an obvious reason why you’re doing that.

        I have made no unsubstantiated assertions. Pick one of my assertions out and I’ll explain how I substantiated it.

        My replies are eminently understandable. If you don’t understand my replies, it’s not because of anything lacking in my replies. It has to do with the state of your intellect.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re quite confused. I did not just try to defend myself. I gave an irrefutable defense of myself. You lost. I won.

        There is nothing from your side. Bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing. That’s all you’ve got, nothing.

        I have not made any unsubstantiated assertions. Anyone going over my posts can easily see that I have substantiated everything I have asserted.

      • mosquito

        You’re confused.

        “Bald – Merriam-Webster’s Learner’s Dictionary

        Definition of bald written for English Language Learners from the Merriam-Webster … She repeated her bald assertion that her son was not guilty of the crime.”

        A bold assertion is something quite different from a bald assertion. The latter has something to do with being unsubstantiated, which is precisely what I have been talking about. You should have been able to figure that out just from the use of the two words, bold and bald.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re very confused.

        Merriam-Webster: “She repeated her bald assertion that her son was not guilty of the crime.”

        A bold assertion is something quite different than a bald assertion. The latter has to do with being unsubstantiated, which is about what I have been talking.

        I’m not trying to get in the last word. I’m simply exercising my right to defend myself against your spurious accusations.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re hopelessly confused. I have never just asserted something. I have proven all my assertions. So, you’re being deluded is an established fact, not some bald, unsubstantiated assertion.

      • mosquito

        You write: “There is no proof of such except they dared to disagree with you and call you on it.” That’s really quite strange. I didn’t know that that was a proof. If you say so.

      • GenerallyConfused

        Oh my goodness, you are hilarious. Have you thought about doing stand up comedy? I’m about to fall over I’m laughing so hard.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, just a further display of childish behavior.

      • GenerallyConfused

        And there you go again with your hilarity.

      • mosquito

        As I said, you’ve got nothing, just a further display of childish behavior.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        I–and many others— prefer the ‘ adult’ behavior of running around screaming while NUDE — and being arrested for that– as a teacher at michigan state university on oct 2012
        ======================================
        it was a logical move worthy of Mr Spocks reverance.

      • Your account is fallacious. I was never arrested for anything. Being put in handcuffs does not constitute being arrested. In order to be arrested you have to be charged with a crime and imprisoned until bail is paid. I was never charged with a crime. One on-line article confirms that I was never arrested: “MSU police placed McCarthy in protected custody and transported him to a
        local hospital. He will not be charged with a crime, according to
        police.”

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        wrong answer– “professor”
        the definition(s) of ARRESTED are many- here are a few which fit U like those cute socks in the above photo
        (a) to seize by legal authority or warrant; take into custody ( you oct 2012)
        (b) the taking into custody as by officers of an institution ( you again; oct 2012)
        (c) the act of stopping or the state of BEING stopped ( you being STOPPED for public nudity)
        =====================================
        U admitted U were taken into custody by MSU police——— ( SEE: above definitions)
        ****************************************************
        shall we discuss which beans make up the most quaint ( metaphorically) hill ?

      • You’re a sleezeball. Custody, in the first two definitions, refers to imprisonment. So, your first and second definitions agree with mine.

        The third definition is completely irrelevant to what you were talking about when you said that I was arrested. For you to even bring it up demonstrates that you are a pathological liar and an utter sleezeball.

        You raised a straw man. Raising a straw man is a basic logical mistake. Protective custody is not the same thing as custody, which refers to imprisonment.

      • mosquito

        You’re a sleezeball. Custody, in the first two definitions, refers to imprisonment. So, your first and second definitions agree with mine.

        The third definition is completely irrelevant to what you were talking about when you said that I was arrested. For you to even bring it up demonstrates that you are a pathological liar and an utter sleezeball.

        You raised a straw man. Raising a straw man is a basic logical mistake. Protective custody is not the same thing as custody, which refers to imprisonment.

        Everyone reading your post knows exactly what you were claiming. You were claiming that I was charged with a crime and imprisoned for it. This is clear when you wrote that I was incarcerated: “I am pleased to have briefly spoken with the ”human” who was incarcerated”.

        So, what you are doing now is just shameless backpeddling, demonstrating that you are a lying sleezeball.

      • mosquito

        mosquito

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        u were arrested as U were cuffed,,,,,,,,,,they took U away which is CUSTODY…U were NOT charged with a Crime
        you were incarcerated ( definition: to shut in; to confine)
        ======================================
        U really are fun to destroy with logical facts,,,,,,,,,,,
        unless; of course U can PROVE that ONLINE definitions ( see: FREE DICTIONARY / DICTIONARY .COM and WIKIPEDIA ) are all WRONG and U are correct
        ====================================
        ALSO– the CORRECT spelling (of which U err frequently) is SLEAZEBALL; the URBAN ”spelling ” is sleezeball———–please make a note of this
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        your move grandmaster

      • You’re a sleezeball. Custody, in the first two definitions, refers to
        imprisonment. So, your first and second definitions agree with mine.

        The
        third definition is completely irrelevant to what you were talking
        about when you said that I was arrested. For you to even bring it up
        demonstrates that you are a pathological liar and an utter sleezeball.

        You
        raised a straw man. Raising a straw man is a basic logical mistake.
        Protective custody is not the same thing as custody, which refers to
        imprisonment.

        Everyone reading your post knows exactly what you
        were claiming. You were claiming that I was charged with a crime and
        imprisoned for it. This is clear when you wrote that I was incarcerated:
        “I am pleased to have briefly spoken with the ”human” who was
        incarcerated”.

        So, what you are doing now is just shameless backpeddling, demonstrating that you are a lying sleezeball.

      • My dear, you take Mr. Spock as your model for a logical person. No wonder you don’t have a clue about logic.

      • You’re quite illogical. All of these posts of yours are straw men. The construction of straw men is one of the most basic of logical errors. It is no surprise that you continue to erect straw men. After all, you’re a moron. Also, your construction of straw men proves that you are a moron. You have not got a clue about logic.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        And there you go again, proving that you are pathetically childish.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You are hopelessly childish. You have no argument to refute my argument. Hence, you resort to childish mocking. Scripturally speaking, the mocker is one of the most vile creatures on earth.

      • mosquito

        Mocking me by saying “if you say so” is most definitely childish. That’s not a subjective opinion. That’s an objective fact. If you are too immature to concede that fact, then that just means that you are even more childish than I thought.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        please GOOGLE ” john McCarthy nude michigan state university arrest” an look up the photo( I have it as my avatar)
        MOSQUITO is john mccarthy– the loon who ran around naked while teaching his class on oct 2012
        =======================================
        ask him about that lucid moment of LOGIC an assertiveness

      • Thanks for proving that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        That’s right, I have not played the childish game of name calling. Any charge which I have made against anyone in this thread has been deduced by impeccable logical reasoning. So, once the charge is made, it is by way of appealing to an established fact, not by way of childishly asserting it.

        You’re very confused. All my assertions have been established by irrefutable logical arguments. Any competent logician will confirm this. Your denying this demonstrates that you are either too slow to follow these arguments or you are just simply a partisan bigot.

      • mosquito

        Your obstinately incorrigible. I have nowhere involved myself in the childish activity of name calling. Proving that someone is a moron and then pointing out that they are a moron is not name calling. It is merely appealing to a previously established fact.

        You are quite childish with your “if you say so”.

      • mosquito

        I suppose that you have not resorted to name calling. I also have not resorted to name calling. If you think that I have, it is because you don’t understand what is the childish game of name calling. It is not, as you seem to think, calling someone a name. If it were, then I’d be involved in name calling when I called my wife a mother. But, you have resorted to mocking. Scripturally speaking, the mocker is one of the most vile persons on earth.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your confused. I have nowhere resorted to the childish game of name calling. You are apparently of the ignorant opinion that this game is about calling someone a name. If this were true, then I would be involved in this childish game when I call my wife a mother. You obviously don’t know what constitutes this game.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I pointed out earlier, I have already answered your question.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Where the English language comes from is totally irrelevant to the question of whether it is a bastardization.

        An assertion being bald has absolutely nothing to do with covering or hair.

        I did not avoid your question. I was quite specific about where your post was illogical.

      • Nemisis

        A person with your self-professed knowledge and mastery of all things should at least know the difference between “know” and “no”

        Just in-case you decide to edit your ironic failure, I have screen shot your fail for everyone to see.

        Find it here.

        imgur DOT com/r4Lftwc

      • Once again, Nemisis, you have proven yourself to be a liar. I never claimed to have mastery of all things.

        Your logic is atrocious. The fact that I made a mistake concerning know and no in no way implies that I don’t know the difference between the two. That’s like saying that if a person made a mistake in adding to numbers he doesn’t know how to add. You’re quite the moron.

      • Nemisis

        You are a complete idiot. When I say complete, I mean there is nothing missing in your quest to perfect idiocy.

        Let me dumb this down for you.
        You. Troll. You. Fail.

        Dance little monkey.

      • You’ve got nothing. For that is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing. Why are you so intent on proving that you’re a moron? Have you no self respect?

      • Nemisis

        Wrong, again little monkey.

      • No, my last post describes a well known principle of logic. It’s perfectly correct.

      • Nemisis

        What “well known principle of logic” would that be. All I see is obtaining the next level of suck. Your suck now goes to 11.

      • mosquito

        You’re really slow on the uptake, aren’t you? It’s the principle which I described in my second to last post just above.

      • Nemisis

        “Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction.
        Sometimes, this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted (argumentum ad nauseam). In other cases, its repetition may be cited as evidence of its truth, in a variant of the appeal to authority or appeal to belief fallacies.

        This fallacy is sometimes used as a form of rhetoric by politicians, or during a debate as a filibuster. In its extreme form, it can also be a form of brainwashing. Modern politics contains many examples of proof by assertions. This practice can be observed in the use of political slogans, and the distribution of “talking points”, which are collections of short phrases that are issued to members of modern political parties for recitation to achieve maximum message repetition. The technique is also sometimes used in advertising.”

        What is not said here, is that it is all bullshit.
        That is all you have done, in every single post.
        Even your lame attempts to debase comments based on improper use of language or misspelled words, including your most famous gaffe, where you committed the very foul you were bitching, like a little monkey, about. And, then you defend that bullshit by saying anyone can make a mistake. You are a fucking joke. Every comment you make is nothing more than harassment of the previous commenter.
        Your are not a useful or productive member of any society. All of your posts are juvenile at best.
        You want to prove you are more than the sum of your posts? Start by posting something that is not self-serving and is actually beneficial to the conversation.

        If GK confirms your bullshit ID. I will gladly call you.
        Though, I do not think you will like the results.

      • You have once again proven that you are a moron. All of this stuff about proof by assertion has absolutely nothing to do with my proofs. The fact that my arguments are proofs can be confirmed by any competent logician. Your assertions to the contrary are worthless and untrustworthy, since you are a moron, a fraud, and a liar.

      • Furthermore, my criticism of English usage in this thread are all perfectly sound, as any professor of English can confirm.

        As always with you, you’ve got nothing. That is what bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to, nothing. Adding to this, your straw men, adds nothing to your contribution to this thread. So, you’ve contributed nothing to this thread.

        My posts are most definitely not juvenile. They are eminently logical. Your opinion to the contrary is worthless, as I previously explained.

      • Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic as is demonstrated by your repeated failure with logic in this thread. You have yet to write a conditional statement in which the premise implies the conclusion. It really is quite pathetic to watch you try to construct a logical argument.

      • Nemisis

        AND…. Now the little monkey is talking to himself.

      • mosquito

        You’re hopelessly self deluded and pathetically childish. I was talking to you, not me. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic as is
        demonstrated by your repeated failure with logic in this thread. You have yet to write a conditional statement in which the premise implies the conclusion. It really is quite pathetic to watch you try to construct a logical argument.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        actually,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the THREAD does clearly say U sent THAT post to yourself
        =======================================
        logically; we all do assume

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I already conceded that the post was sent to my account. But, that is irrelevant. The issue is whom was I addressing in the quote? And, it is clear that I was not addressing myself. Your confusing the issue of to which account the post was sent and who was being addressed in the post. So, your argument is another one of your moronic straw men.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        look at my new profile name and photo————- thats me honoring ” mosquito” as im his favorite ” moron” so donnnn U try 2 become that!! Im his fae moron!! not you!!!
        ————————————————————–
        I do hope he appreciates my ” shrine” here to him as Im certain U and many others do!
        ====================================
        now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, to get his approval on my handiwork:::: stay tuned!!!

      • You are most definitely not my favorite moron. You’re not my favorite anything. You’re just a pathetic, bigoted, loser.

        But thanks for proving that you’re an ignorant bigot.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        loser???
        pray tell; O sage———–
        what exactly have I lost ( c’ept time ticking away)?

      • mosquito

        You’re a loser. Your life is a waste of time. You are totally insignificant.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        should I pattern myself after a ” winner”(???) such as thee?

      • mosquito

        You cannot pattern yourself after me. I am an eminently intelligent man and you’re a blathering moron. Indeed, you cannot pattern yourself after any winner. You’re a loser and that’s the story.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        lets see———
        “functioning brain”
        –does that include running around naked after screaming incoherently whilst at work and then being handcuffed and dragged away to a hospital?
        ========================================
        you are correct———
        I cannot pattern myself after that- glad we again see ” eye2eye”

      • Your logic is atrocious. Just about every time that you have tried to make a logical argument you raised a straw man. Raising straw men is a moronic activity.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know for sure.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate your assertions.

      • Saying that someone is a loser does not imply that he lost anything. A loser could be someone that never had anything. A loser is someone who never wins at the game of life. A loser might think that he’s winning because he has amassed a lot of wealth. That only goes to demonstrate what a loser he is.

      • I have previously proven that gian keys is a moron, a fraud, and a liar. Hence, any of his further posts are a complete waste for anyone reading this thread. So, just ignore him.

      • I have previously proven that Nemisis is a moron, a fraud, and a liar. So, any further posts by Nemisis are a complete waste of everyone’s time. Just ignore him.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        hey!!!! U said that about meeeeeeeeeeeee!!
        =================================
        U canot say that about ANYONE else as that’s CHEATING ON ME!!
        …………….I wanna divorce

      • mosquito

        I have previously proven that gian keys is a moron, a fraud, and a liar. So, any further posts by gian keys are a complete waste of time for any reader of this thread. Just ignore him.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        that’s better,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
        gimme a kiss
        ( and take off those terrible socks!!)

      • You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never even try to substantiate your assertions.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • Nemisis

        “mosquito mosquito • a day ago

        Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic as is demonstrated by your repeated failure with logic in this thread. You have yet to write a conditional statement in which the premise implies the conclusion. It really is quite a pathetic thing to watch, you trying
        to construct a logical argument.”

        Even Mosquito thinks Mosquito is a failure.

      • mosquito

        Anyone with half a brain knows that I was addressing you with those comments. I couldn’t possibly have been addressing me, since I am an expert in logic, and all my use of logic in this thread has been impeccable.

      • Nemisis

        Anyone with a complete brain would realize you posted a reply to yourself. You could have replied to me, however you chose to reply to yourself. You were not very nice to yourself. That shows a strong self-hate tendency. Are you okay? Do you need a hug? If you do, you should head on down to the porn studio at MSU.

      • Once again, you’ve proven yourself to be a moron. This is another one of your moronic straw men.

        The issue is not whether I posted a reply to my account. The issue is whom was I addressing in that reply. It is clear, from the flow of the posts, that I was not addressing myself, moron.

      • Nemisis

        No, the issue as I stated. You are talking to yourself. That combined with all the other information gained by your posts indicates a mind with low self-esteem with tenancies towards self destruction.

        You cut yourself. Don’t you.

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded. You know that I was not addressing myself. And you know that there is nothing in my posts that indicates that I have low self esteem and tendencies towards self destruction. Indeed, my posts reveal a man who is very self confident. You’re a pathological liar.

      • No, the issue is as I stated. The issue is not whether I posted a reply to my account. The issue is whom was I addressing in that reply. It is clear, from the flow of the posts, that I was not addressing myself, moron.

      • Nemisis

        i vehemently disagree in fact i am actually shaking my head
        wait that is not in actual disagreement it is in disbelief
        if you follow the flow it is clear you must take into account who the reply is from and to whom the reply is to therefore your are now arguing my position thank you

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. Once again, your premise does not imply your conclusion. Yet, you say that it does. This demonstrates that you are a moron.

      • Nemisis

        parse it bitch

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. Parsing is a grammatical act, not an act of logic.

      • Nemisis

        Nothing was mentioned of logic. Parse the fricken paragraph. You mullet headed thumb sucking bivot flosser.

      • You’re a backpeddling sleezeball.

        You were talking about the logic of your position. This is clear from the flow of the thread immediately preceding your “parse it bitch”, which was all about your logic and how atrocious it is.

      • Nemisis

        No, that is what you want it to be about.
        That is not what it is really about.
        Even if it was about that, which it is not, you would still need to parse out the fucking paragraph. No matter how you try to interpret this, you still can not prove you are anyone.
        You can not prove you have the backing of even one logician.
        You continue to fail at this and at life.
        You should try putting your head in an oven.

      • You’re a backpeddling sleezeball.

        You were talking about the
        logic of your position. This is clear from the flow of the thread
        immediately preceding your “parse it bitch”, which was all about your
        logic and how atrocious it is.

      • You’ve got nothing, which you know. That is why you never attempt to substantiate your nonsense.

      • You’re a backpeddling sleezeball.

        You were talking about the
        logic of your position. This is clear from the flow of the thread
        immediately preceding your “parse it bitch”, which was all about your
        logic and how atrocious it is.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating what you post.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons that are previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, that is what it is definitely about, as logic demands.

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, that is what it is definitely about.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • No, it is not what I want it to be about. It is most definitely what it is about, as I previously proved. This is not up for debate. It is an established fact.

        Again, you’re pathetically enslaved to word magic.

      • That’s utter nonsense. I have already proven that the issue was logic, not grammar. Don’t waste your time trying to refute a proof. That’s an impossible thing to do.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. Parsing is a grammatical act, not a logical act.

      • You’re very confused. Parsing is a grammatical act, not a logical act.

      • Nemisis

        again you putz parse the fucking paragraph it is not about logic you stupid jackass mother fucking shit stain on humanity how many times do you need to continue to post replies to the same posts
        your a waste of skin I think I will begin to ignore you now

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re very confused. Parsing is a grammatical act, not a logical act.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you don’t even try to substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Like I said, you’re very confused. Parsing is a grammatical act, not a logical act.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re very confused. Parsing is a grammatical act, not a logical act. You were clearly talking about logic, despite your slimy backpeddling.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re very confused. Parsing is a grammatical act, not a logical act. You were talking about logic, despite your backpeddling.

      • As I said, you’re very confused. Parsing is a grammatical act, not a logical act.

      • No, it is definitely about logic, as I previously proved. You are just backpeddling, in a pathetic attempt to save your face.

      • You’re deeply confused.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That’s why you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • It does not matter a hill of beans whether you disagree. What I said is true, no matter what you think about it. If you take those things into account then you know that the reply is from me and its not to me. If you come to any other conclusion, then you’ve shown that your reading comprehension is atrocious.

      • No, the issue is as I stated. And, you’re a pathological liar. You know full well that I was not talking to myself. You’re just being embarrassingly childish.

      • You’re hopelessly childish. You know full well that I was not talking to myself. What I wrote cannot possibly be written to me, since all of my posts have been eminently logical, unlike your prepubescent pablum.

      • It is clear from the flow of the thread that I am not addressing myself in this quote.

        Indeed, I cannot be addressing myself in this quote since all of my posts have been eminently logical.

      • Nemisis

        yet your dumb ass still replied to your fucking stupid piece of trollish garbage self

      • jamesfitzgerald

        It is clear from the flow of the thread that I am not addressing myself in this quote.

        Indeed, I cannot be addressing myself in this quote since all of my posts have been eminently logical.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never substantiate your statements.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know most definitely.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        It is very clear from the flow of the thread that I am not addressing myself in this quote.

        Indeed, I cannot be addressing myself in this quote since all of my posts have been eminently logical.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you know for sure.

        That is why you never ever substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why you never at all substantiate your assertions.

      • It’s unmistakeably clear that you believe in word magic, in the idea that you just have to assert something in order to establish it.

      • You’re quite childish. You know full well that I was not talking to myself. I can’t be talking to myself, since all my posts in this thread are eminently logical.

      • You’re inextricably tied to the superstition of word magic.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong.

      • mosquito

        No, you are the one who is wrong. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic as you have demonstrated over and over again in this thread.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong.

      • No, you are the one who is wrong. Don’t venture into logic. You have not
        got a clue about logic as you have demonstrated over and over again in
        this thread.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong.

      • mosquito

        No, it’s altogether clear that it is right.

        You’ve got nothing. Your position is bankrupt.

      • No, you are definitely the one who is wrong. Don’t venture into logic. You have not
        got a clue about logic as you have demonstrated over and over again in
        this thread.

      • Nemisis

        Nope, wrong again, and everyone knows only an idiot would make a reply to this post.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, you are most definitely the one who is wrong. Don’t venture into logic. You have not got a clue about logic as you have demonstrated over and over again in this thread.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, you are most definitely the one who is wrong. Don’t venture into logic. You have not
        got a clue about logic as you have demonstrated over and over again in
        this thread.

      • You’re so stupid that you believe in word magic. You believe that by just asserting something, you’ve established it to be true. That makes you certifiably insane.

      • No, you are the one who is wrong again, Nemisis. Also, your last statement is patently false. There are many people who know nothing about your post. So, those people definitely do not know that only an idiot would make a reply to that post.

      • You can hardly move without dabbling in the superstition of word magic.

      • It is so pathetic to watch you enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • No, it’s correct.

        You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • Nemisis

        idiot

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got absolutely nothing, as you clearly know.

        That is why you never even make a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you do definitely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • No, it’s definitely correct.

        You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your assertions.

      • You’re obviously enmeshed in word magic, in the philosophy that, in order to establish something, all you have to do is assert it.

      • marty

        hi mosquito I was reading your post on blocked posts
        and basically I`ve been blocked for the same reason as you on a discussion page
        I had a “troll” mess with me and it got ugly and the moderator banned us both so I cant post on that page anylonger
        best thing to do with trolls is ignore them and go somewhere else this is why my profile is private
        a troll is someone who is disruptive to the thread and gets off on disturbing and antagonizing others its a shame there are those who do this but it is

      • Once again, you’ve shown that you cannot stop trying to perform word magic.

      • Your reading comprehension is very poor. I’m referring to the principle of logic which I laid out in the post to which you responded “Wrong, again little monkey.”

        By the way, why in the world do you have a comma after “Wrong”? It belongs after “again”.

      • Nemisis

        wrong again spock

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your reading comprehension is very poor. I’m referring to the
        principle of logic which I laid out in the post to which you responded
        “Wrong, again little monkey.”

        By the way, why in the world do you have a comma after “Wrong”? It belongs after “again”.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, you’ve definitely got the comma in the wrong place, as any competent English teacher can confirm.

        You’ve got nothing, as you know for sure.

        That is why you never try to substantiate your posts.s

      • jamesfitzgerald

        As I said, your reading comprehension is very poor. I’m referring to the
        principle of logic which I laid out in the post to which you responded
        “Wrong, again little monkey.”

        By the way, why in the world do you have a comma after “Wrong”? It belongs after “again”.

      • As I said, your reading comprehension is very poor. I’m referring to the
        principle of logic which I laid out in the post to which you responded
        “Wrong, again little monkey.”

        By the way, why in the world do you have a comma after “Wrong”? It belongs after “again”.

      • No, you’re wrong, Nemisis. You’ve got the comma in the wrong place, as any competent English teacher will readily confirm.

      • Your reading comprehension is abysmal. I’m talking about the principle of logic that I laid out in the post just before your “Wrong, again little monkey.” post.

        By the way, why do you have a comma after “Wrong,”? It belongs after “again”.

      • Nemisis

        It took you 12 days to come up with that gem of a reply. Wrong fucker. I placed the comma right where I wanted it. Wrong, again little monkey. It changes the context, stupid.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your reading comprehension is abysmal. I’m talking about the
        principle of logic that I laid out in the post just before your “Wrong,
        again little monkey.” post.

        By the way, why do you have a comma after “Wrong,”? It belongs after “again”.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never try to substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I have no doubt that you placed the comma right where you wanted it. The problem is that you are too stupid to have wanted it to be in the right place.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Like I said, your reading comprehension is abysmal. I’m talking about the principle of logic that I laid out in the post just before your “Wrong, again little monkey.” post.

        By the way, why do you have a comma after “Wrong,”? It belongs after “again”.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I have no doubt that you placed the comma where you wanted. The problem is that you are too stupid to want it to be in the right place.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I have no doubt that you place the comma where you wanted it. The problem is that you are not intelligent enough to want it to be in the right place.

      • I have no doubt that you placed the comma where you wanted it to be. The problem is that you are too stupid to want it to be in the right place.

      • No, you are definitely wrong about this. Your comma is most definitely in the wrong place, despite your imbecilic comments about changing the context.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your reading comprehension is atrocious. I’m talking about the principle of logic that I described in the post just before your “Wrong, again little monkey” post, the one where you put the comma in the wrong place, as any competent English teacher can tell you.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your reading comprehension is quite poor. I’m talking about the principle of logic which I described in my post just before your “Wrong, again little monkey” post.

        By the way, why did you put your comma just after “Wrong”, when it belongs just after “again”?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        I am talking about the well known principle of logic that I stated in my post just before your “Wrong, again little monkey.” post.

        Why did you put a comma after “Wrong”? It belongs after “again”.

      • That’s interesting. You make a quest to something. I’ve never heard of doing that. Did you make that up all by yourself?

      • Nemisis

        Lol, you suck. You know why. That’s not a question.

      • Come on, tell us. Did you make that up all by yourself? Is that like asking a question to somebody?

      • Nemisis

        Can you not read, little monkey? I said it was not a question. Here let me rephrase the statement for you.

        You suck, and you “No” why.

      • Apparently, my post went over your head. I was not talking about the sentence which you said was not a question.

      • Nemisis

        Why would you respond by asking if my statement was like asking a question?

        Your question about my statement being like a question is proof that you do not understand a statement is a statement. I was being extremely clear about it being a statement. I even told you afterwards that it was a statement by saying it was not a question.
        Your inability to follow instruction is not my fault.
        It is probably due to your sub-par education or maybe just poor genetics which to a point is not even your fault. That you have a disability beyond your control is obvious. My not allowing you to use it as a crutch is directly related to me being “despicable”. My “malicious” attacks on you are not malicious, yet. If anything I am holding back.

        You have yet to prove anything.
        GK has yet to confirm your status.
        So quoting GK at this point is pointless and still not fact admitted into evidence.
        Since GK is involved in the thread, verification of GK’s actions are GK’s responsibility.

        Until then…

        You still

      • You’re truly learning disabled. I did not “respond by asking if” your “statement was like asking a question? I asked whether making “a quest to somebody” was like “asking a question to somebody”? The fact that you failed to comprehend that that was what I explicitly asked demonstrates that your lacking a functioning brain.

        You’re full of crap. You’re despicable because, among other things, you are a pathological liar.

        You’re full of crap. I’ve proven quite a number of things in this thread. Any competent logician can confirm that fact. Your opinion about this matter is worthless and untrustworthy since you are a moron, a fraud, and a liar.

      • Nemisis

        I’m despicable for reasons I won’t discuss here. Lying is not my game here, that is yours. My game here is just to piss you off. That is not despicable, that is just me not letting you be a jerk to everyone.
        I have disposable time and chose to annoy you. That makes me happy.
        Since you suck so hard, you make me happier.

      • mosquito

        I have no doubt that you are despicable for reasons of which I am not aware. But, you are definitely despicable for reasons which I have exposed in my proofs. Lying is definitely your game here. I proved this quite some time ago. I have not done any lying. All of my posts have been eminently logical.

      • You don’t annoy me. Since you are so thoroughly illogical, you make it extremely easy for me to refute you. You are obviously severely disturbed mentally. Otherwise, you wouldn’t keep coming back for me to refute you.

        You’re quite confused. Doing something just to piss someone off, which is what you just said was your game, is most definitely despicable. It’s what is called malice. The chief characteristic of Satan is malice. So, you are of your father the devil. You don’t get any more despicable than that.

      • Nemisis

        That Satan is my father would imply that I am a theist. I am not.
        I have owned my despicable nature. How is it that you are confused.
        Malice is not what I have demon-strated here. It is a kindness. Not for you, rather for others.

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. That Satan is your father would not imply that you are a theist. The fact that you believe that it would implies that you are a moron.

        The fact that you have owned your despicable nature is totally irrelevant to my posts. How is it that you are confused? (By the way, that’s a question, moron.)

        Malice is definitely what you have demonstrated here.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong. Since Satan is a theological construct and I am not a theist, then Satan is not my father. Again you are wrong. Perception is the key here. I am not showing malice. Malice would be me calling MSU and lodging a complaint about JDM the penis branding professor trolling comment sites and casting a disparaging image about MSU. Then actually sending the content of JDM’s comment history to the MSU student newspaper and putting up a website showcasing your mental instability. That would be malicious. I have shown restraint. I have also been providing a service to the community as a whole by providing a humorous counter-troll thread they can sit back and ignore or participate in. I find it refreshing that those around me have taken the time to make bets based on your responses and send their winnings to charities. I think what I will do is send a copy of this to Ohio State’s Student newspaper and one to the Columbia student newspaper.
        Maybe I will just send it to your former students. You do understand that I have nothing to fear from you. You can’t cut my gpa, you can’t affect my future. On the otherhand…I wonder how a board of directors would feel about continued “bad press” and fallout from your inability to cope with life like a reasonable human. Hmmm
        Would they continue to support a liability such as yourself?
        Maybe we should find out.

        Whatcha think Joni Dick Whiple?

      • mosquito

        Once again, you’ve proven that you are a moron. You wrote: ” Since Satan is a theological construct and I am not a theist, then Satan is not my father.” This is a moronic conditional statement. Your premise does not imply your conclusion. The fact that you think that it does demonstrates that you are a moron.

        That is nonsense. You are most definitely showing malice. Anyone going back over your posts to me can readily confirm that you have repeatedly shown malice toward me. That’s an irrefutable fact, despite your bald, unsubstantiated assertions to the contrary.

        You’ve got nothing, moron.

      • Nemisis

        Wrong again junior.

        I may be showing malice to you, but to others I am showing a kindness.
        I could show you a kindness, but you refuse to post anything that is constructive to a conversation. So I show a kindness to the greater population, which to you is malicious. Because you place yourself in a position of greater importance than the collective you are indicating that you do not have their interests in mind. You are therefore being malicious in that you do not care for the collective happiness and only about your own. That makes of you, as you claim of I.

      • This is more bullshit from you. You obviously don’t know what the word malice means.

      • This is more of your bullshit. You obviously don’t know what the word malice means.

        You’re a moron. You write: “Wrong again, junior. I may be showing malice to you,”. That’s contradicting yourself. If you’re showing malice to me, then I’m right, not wrong.

        Whether or not you are showing kindness to others is totally irrelevant to the question of whether or not you are showing malice towards me. My God, you’re a moron.

      • Nemisis

        i believe i covered that in the greater good being preformed for the greater numbers
        you need to realize something i am a shoot the hostage kind of personality i show no compassion in the pursuit of what needs to be done i do not care if your feelings are hurt or if my actions are construed as malicious i simply have no need to appease you there is no value to me for your comfort if you were homeless on the street with a blanket and another homeless person was across the street without a blanket i would take your blanket give it to the other person
        and throat punch you for not sharing that is who i am so when i say i show you no malice it is because i do not care to give you special attention of that caliber however i am not above malice i just wont heap malice upon someone i am not convinced about their identity
        i really would like for you to prove that you are mccarthy because then i can show you the difference between malice and simply not putting up with your bullshit.

      • mosquito

        Your logic is atrocious. This is just more of your bullshit.

        You have most definitely shown malice towards me. It doesn’t matter a hill of beans what you think about that issue, since you are a moron.

      • Nemisis

        we talked about malice here is my final reply to that
        call your mommy because i dont give a shit about your feelings
        go cry
        it is not my job to ease your pain or suffering or treat you like a person
        i am not obligated to give a fuck about you
        if you took a hammer and beat yourself in the head till you passed out i would probably laugh at you and revive you so you can do it again
        to people on the outside looking in on this crapfest i may or may not appear to be malicious at all i may be doing the entire world a favor by what i am doing they may think you are the malicious bugger looking for a way to fill your empty life but in the grand scheme of life
        i dont give a fuck about you about who you really are if you are who you say you are which i doubt then you are the alpha idiot for thinking that you are accomplishing anything here and that my prior prediction that you were fired for being a fucking mindless idiot holds very true

        If you are John D McCarthy, you have access to your MSU personal web page. Update your fucking webpage it is two years out of date.
        How fucking lazy are you? You Spineless wretch.
        Can’t update your webpage.
        Can’t finish “Your own” equation. Probably have no fucking clue as to what JDM really worked on.
        Your are the worst type of person and I really do hope that our paths cross. Not so I can beat your ass, because that would be stupid. I would just laugh in your face. Maybe, if there is a god, I can have flu and laugh a snot right in your eye. Now that shit is malicious.
        Anyway Dance little Dr. Wrong. There is plenty of bait for you to chomp on. Only an idiot would reply to this.

      • mosquito

        Once again, you’ve proven that you are a moron.

        Once again, the premises of your conditional statements do not imply their conclusions. You’re hold upon logic is abysmal.

        You believe in word magic. You believe that by asserting something it magically becomes true. That implies that you are a moron.

        You have yet to make any contribution to this debate. For straw men and bald, unsubstantiated assertions amount to nothing.

      • Nemisis

        I love it when you make my arguments against you for me.
        It saves so much time.

        “Anyway Dance little Dr. Wrong. There is plenty of bait for you to chomp on. Only an idiot would reply to this.”

        The very last sentence of the very post you replied to.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing for reasons previously outlined.

        As I said, you believe in word magic. You believe that by asserting something it magically becomes true. That implies that you are a moron.

      • Nemisis

        Ohhh, Word magic…. as opposed to the Fact Magic your preforming.
        Pulling bullshit “facts” from your ass and making them appear as if they are real. The problem here, my toady little monkey, is you suck at this.
        Everyone can see you for the idiot you are.
        You continue to believe your own bullshit. That is sort of admirable, or pathetic depending on your age.
        Everyone knows that only a complete moronic idiot would reply to this comment. I know that your silence on the matter is just acceptance.

      • You believe in word magic, moron.

        You’ve got nothing. That is why you never attempt to substantiate your mental diarrhea..

      • You’ve got nothing. That is why you never attempt to substantiate what you say.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing and you know it.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your nonsense.

      • You’ve got nothing, as previously explained.

        You know this to be true, which is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your nonsense.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating what you post.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating what you post.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your nonsense.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make so much as a feeble attempt at substantiating your posts.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your assertions.

      • Guest

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your posts.

      • mosquito

        What was it you wanted to say about my pre-form-ing? (“your preforming”)

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your assertions.

      • mosquito

        You’ve got nothing for reasons previously listed.

        You know this. That is why you never try to substantiate your drivel.

      • You’ve got absolutely nothing for the reasons previously outlined.

        As
        I said, you believe in word magic. You believe that by asserting
        something it magically becomes true. That implies that you are a moron.

      • You have nothing, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your assertions.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        You so wrong.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, you are so wrong.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re a very confused individual. You’re always on the wrong side of an issue.

      • No, you’re so wrong. You’ve been wrong in every single one of your posts in response to me in this thread.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You clearly believe in the fantasy of word magic, that all you have to do to establish an assertion is to assert it.

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded. I have proven all of my assertions. I have not pulled any “facts” from my ass.

        Again, you’ve proven that your superstitious, believing in the superstition of word magic, that by asserting an assertion you have established that assertion.

        Your second to last sentence is patently false for reasons which I have previously given.

      • Once again, you’ve made it clear that you are enslaved to the superstition of word magic.

      • You’re a bona fide, a number one, moron. It doesn’t matter a hill of beans what you give a fuck about. The fact that you think that that is relevant demonstrates what a moron you are.

      • You have most definitely shown malice towards me. In particular, you have done so in this post of yours.

        You’ve got nothing, as you know. That is why you never try to substantiate your posts.

      • You most definitely have shown me malice.

      • You definitely showed malice toward me.

      • Nemisis

        So what.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        So, that means that you are a despicable person. Your opinion about the matter is worthless.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        So that proves that you are a despicable person.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        So that proves that you are a despicable person. It doesn’t matter at all what you think about that, or what you think about anything.

      • So, it proves that you are a complete asshole. Only a complete asshole would bear malice toward another creature.

      • So, it demonstrates what a despicable person you are.

      • That’s precisely my point. You’ve shown malice toward me. Thanks for proving it for me all by yourself.

      • mosquito

        You most definitely showed me malice, your moronic, bald, unsubstantiated assertion notwithstanding. You’re a bullshit artist. All of your posts have been bullshit.

      • You are definitely showing malice towards me. This post makes that abundantly clear.

      • You have definitely shown me malice.

      • You most definitely showed malice toward me.

      • Nemisis

        Need a tissue?

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You assuredly showed malice toward me.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, I’m fine. As I said, it doesn’t matter at all what you think about this, or any other issue.

      • I’m fine. Your showing malice towards does not move me in the least. I am only glad that it proves that you are a complete asshole. That saves me some effort.

      • No, I do not need a tissue. Your showing malice towards me does not move me in the least. You’re a worthless person. Nothing that you do has any significance. I’m just glad that, by showing me malice, you have demonstrated what a despicable person you are. Only a despicable person would show malice towards another person.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You definitely showed me malice.

      • Thank you for proving my claim, that you have shown malice toward me.

      • You contradicted yourself. If you are showing malice to me, then I am right, not wrong.

      • You are definitely showing malice, despite your bald, unsubstantiated assertion to the contrary.

      • You have nothing, as you know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That’s why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your posts.

      • Nemisis

        You’re still wrong.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That’s why you never make even a feeble attempt at substantiating your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, you’re still wrong.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • No, you’re still wrong.

        You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That’s why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You certainly believe in word magic. You believe that asserting something establishes it.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Give up on logic. You have not got a clue as to what implies what.

        You’ve got zero, as you know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • Your logic is atrocious. Your premises never imply your conclusions.

        You most definitely have shown malice towards me.

      • Once again, you’ve proven that your completely illiterate regarding logic. Your premise does not imply your conclusion.

      • Your logic is atrocious. Of all the many conditional statements which you have written in this thread, not one of them has a premise which implies its conclusion.

        I am not in the least bit confused. You have most definitely demonstrated malice here. Your behavior in this thread is a textbook case of malice.

      • Nemisis

        Cite the textbook please.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. The phrase “textbook case” has nothing to do with textbooks. “A textbook case, it is a classic or common example of something”

      • mosquito

        You’ve got a hell of a nerve. You have not substantiated a single thing that you’ve said in response to me. And you’ve got the gall to command me to substantiate something that I said? You’re a pathetic twerp.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. The phrase “textbook case” has nothing to do with textbooks. “A textbook case, it is a classic or common example of something.”

      • mosquito

        You’ve got a nerve. You haven’t substantiated a single statement of yours in response to me. Yet, you have the gall to command me to substantiate one of my statements. You’re a pathetic twerp.

      • mosquito

        You’re a moron. The phrase “textbook case” has nothing to do with textbooks. “A textbook case, it is a classic or common example of something.”

      • The phrase “textbook case” does not refer to any textbook. It refers to a common case or example of something.

      • Nemisis

        There is no book? Then that means you are full of shit for saying there was.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        Your logic is atrocious. Your premise does not imply your conclusion. I never said that there was a book. I used an idiom, “textbook case”, whose meaning I have given previously.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, I never said that there was a book. I used an idiom, “textbook case”, whose meaning I have explained to you.

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        No, I never said that there was a book. I used an idiom, “textbook case”, whose meaning I gave to you earlier. Your statement is like saying that when one says it is as hot as hell out, he is saying that it is literally as hot as hell out.

      • I never said that there was a book. I used an idiom, whose meaning I gave to you earlier. Your statement is like saying that when someone says that it is as hot as hell outside, then they mean that it is literally as hot as hell outside.

      • You’re very confused. I never said that there was a book. I used an idiom, textbook case, whose meaning I explained to you. Your argument is like saying that when someone says that it is hot as hell outside, then they mean that it is literally as hot as hell outside.

      • You know that I was not referring to any textbook. You know that I was using an idiom, textbook case, that has nothing whatsoever to do with a textbook, no more than the idiom, he’s in the dog house, has anything to do with a dog house.

      • Your logic is atrocious. Your premise does not imply your conclusion.

        Your logic is atrocious. Whether or not you are showing kindness to others is totally irrelevant to the issue of whether or not you are showing malice towards me.

      • Your logic is atrocious. That’s like saying that my father is a Roman Catholic implies that I’m a papist, which is sheer nonsense, since I’m not a papist at all. I’ve never met anyone as stupid as you are. You have definitely demonstrated malice towards me. Your bit about kindness is a straw man. Showing kindness towards others does not free you from the charge of showing malice towards me. You are seriously brain damaged. You should see a specialist about it.

      • I have no doubt that you are despicable for reasons other than those which I gave. But you are despicable for the reasons which I gave.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        he dont like that I changed my username2honor him
        =======================================
        where O where have I FAILED?????
        hes so much fun to antagonize

      • Guest

        You’ve got nothing, which you surely know.

        That is why you never make even a feeble attempt to substantiate your posts.

      • Your reading comprehension is atrocious.

        I wrote: “You make a quest to something. I’ve never heard of doing that. Did you make that up all by yourself?”.

        And then, I followed up on this by writing: “Come on, tell us. Did you make that up all by yourself? Is that like asking a question to somebody?”

        So, I asked you whether making a quest to something was like asking a question to somebody.

      • Nemisis

        idiot

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you assuredly know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you most certainly know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’re living in the dark ages, believing in magic, in word magic. You believe that all one has to do to establish an assertion is to assert it.

      • You’re embarrassingly infantile.

      • Nemisis

        The fact that that mistake occurred whilst you were thoroughly thrashing another for a “mistake” makes it all the more hilarious .
        Your weak attempt to defend that which you attack is even more laughable than your “mistake” .

        Dance Little Monkey.

      • You’re hopelessly self deluded.

        I have not thrashed anyone for a “mistake”.

        Every single criticism which I have made in this thread was justified by the relevant posts in this thread.

        I did not make a weak attempt to defend that which I attack. In fact I did not make any attempt to defend it. Why would I do that? Why would I defend what I attack? Wouldn’t that be self defeating behavior?

      • Nemisis

        I can’t read the words you’re typing because your suck is casting too much glare.

      • mosquito

        Why are you so slavishly devoted to proving that you are learning disabled? Have you no self respect?

      • Nemisis

        You suck, Dyson is seeking grant’s to study your superpowers of suck.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        idiot

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You clearly believe in word magic.

        You’ve got nothing, as you undoubtedly know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’re obviously sold on word magic, on the idea that by simply asserting something it is magically established.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        What is that belongs to grant (i.e. grant’s) that Dyson is seeking? Is it seeking grant’s vacuum cleaner? Shouldn’t grant be capitalized so that Dyson would be seeking Grant’s vacuum cleaner?

      • You’ve got nothing, as you know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        1d10t

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate any of your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’re hopelessly entrenched in word magic, in the belief that you can get something from nothing; just assert something and it’s established.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most assuredly know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’re so stupid. Suck does not cast glare.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        That’s ridiculous. Suck does not case glare.

      • You’re a moron. Such does not cast glare.

      • gian keys LOVES shemale porn

        please please read my messages to him,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and his delightfully predictable replies

      • Nemisis

        Can’t follow you, but I will keep an eye out.

      • mosquito

        Thanks for making life easy for me and proving by yourself that you are an ignorant bigot.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • Nemisis

        useless idiot

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you most definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you definitely know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • You believe in word magic. You believe that by merely asserting something, you’ve miraculously established it.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you very clearly know.

        That is why, you never substantiate your posts.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        You’ve got nothing, as you certainly know.

        That is why you don’t substantiate your assertions.

      • jamesfitzgerald

        That’s like saying it would be hilarious if a teacher, while correcting a student on an addition mistake, got the student’s name wrong. If you find that hilarious, then you have a sorry ass sense of humor.

      • You’ve got nothing, as you well know.

        That’s why you never make so much as a feeble attempt to substantiate your assertions.

      • Nancy Searle

        you are a pompous ass

      • mosquito

        I agree with your message to Nemisis entirely, Nancy Searle. As you said to him, he is a pompous ass.

      • Nemisis

        Wow. Can you believe it? Looks like gnat got himself a fan club that talks just like gnat.

      • JOHN McCARTHY NUDE ARREST

        “guests” who are regressive white trash crybaby trolls are small dicked losers who come on here to cry

      • You’re thoroughly childish. You’ve got the social development of a redneck. You’re white trash.

      • Nemisis

        You really want to jump in on this bus?
        Your gone for 2 months and the first comment back is in the middle of a thread. Bitching about someone being an ass.

        I may very well be an ass, I won’t dispute that. Pompous I will dispute. In the meantime, while you are picking dung out of your tooth, perhaps you could form an argument to back up your claim of my pompousness.

      • mosquito

        She does not need to. I have already proven that you’re a pompous ass, that you are a fraudulent blowhard.

      • Nemisis

        The only thing proven here is that you suck.

      • Once again, you have proven that you don’t have a functioning brain.

      • Nemisis

        I have two actually. One is biological and analog. The other digital and silicon based.

      • mosquito

        No, you’re wrong again, as you always are. You don’t have any functioning brain. Your posts in this thread in response to me make this abundantly clear.

      • No, you don&#