Former Bush AG Smacks Down GOP for Obstructing Obama on Scalia’s Replacement (Video)

There’s undoubtedly going to be plenty of debate over the next few months concerning replacing the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. While the Constitution says that it’s a sitting president’s responsibility to nominate someone to fill his vacancy, Republicans are comically trying to argue that a president in his last year of office shouldn’t be allowed to replace a Justice.



Well, President Obama has found himself with an unlikely ally in this “fight,” former Attorney General under George W. Bush, Alberto Gonzales. During an interview Monday morning, Gonzales told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that it’s the president’s job to fill the vacancy and Senate Republicans should do their job by not trying to delay doing so for almost a year.

“I know there’s a big debate going on right now about whether or not Obama should nominate someone,” Gonzales said. “From my perspective, having worked at the White House and the Department of Justice, there’s just no question in my mind that as president of the United States, you have an obligation to fill a vacancy.”

“I suspect President Obama is going to do his job,” he continued. “And after he does his job and nominating a hopefully qualified individual, the Senate will do its job eventually on its own calendar.”

“The bottom line from my perspective is the president has to do his job in nominating a qualified individual and then the Senate does it’s job in assessing whether or not this person is qualified for a lifetime appointment on the court based upon experience, based upon ideology and based upon integrity,” Gonzales continued to reiterate.

This just goes to show you how obstructive the Republican party has become. We’re looking at a time where Republicans from just one administration ago seem like moderate Democrats more so than they do modern day conservatives.

Though what’s ironic about all of this is that Republicans are “rejecting” allowing President Obama to do the job that’s outlined for him to do via the Constitution before they even know who he would nominate. It goes to show you that this isn’t about “integrity” or doing their job as the Constitution says they should do – it’s 100 percent about playing partisan politics.

As I’ve said repeatedly over the last few days, Scalia’s death has put on the forefront just how important this next election is. With his spot potentially up for grabs, as well as potentially three more spots opening up over the next five years, the balance of power in the Supreme Court for the next 20-30 years is literally on the line in November. That means women’s rights, gay rights, health care, climate change and voting rights are all also on the line.



This November everyone on the left, and even those in the center who don’t want to see radical right-wing ideologies seize control of this country, must come together to make damn sure Republicans don’t take back the White House. There’s just too much at stake for us to allow that to happen.

Watch Gonzales’s comments below via CNN:





Allen Clifton

Allen Clifton is a native Texan who now lives in the Austin area. He has a degree in Political Science from Sam Houston State University. Allen is a co-founder of Forward Progressives and creator of the popular Right Off A Cliff column and Facebook page. Be sure to follow Allen on Twitter and Facebook, and subscribe to his channel on YouTube as well.

Comments

Facebook comments

  • Jim Bean

    Obama supported the filibuster of Alito.

    On July 27, 2007, Schumer told his ACS audience:

    How do we apply the lessons we learned from Roberts and Alito to be the next nominee, especially if—God forbid—there is another vacancy under this president? … [F]or the rest of this president’s term and if there is another Republican elected with the same selection criteria let me say this: We should reverse the presumption of confirmation. The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito. Given the track record of this president and the experience of obfuscation at the hearings—with respect to the Supreme Court, at least—I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm a Supreme Court nominee except in extraordinary circumstances.

    • noah vail

      how do you know that sneator Obama supported the action, or lack thereof ?

      • Jim Bean

        He admitted it during his speech two hours ago.

      • noah vail

        I didn’t hear his speach so ill take your.word for it

    • Darrian

      whether that is true or not , who cares? The Republican house has been obstructing EVERY piece of legislation set before them that hasn’t been written by a Republican….so please ,if a few times the Democrats have been partisan over a few things. They have NEVER fallen to the depths of contempt the the GOP has the past 7 years…

      • Heatherfmills3

        ❝my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet.❞….two days ago new McLaren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Here!b1237➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsTree/98$hourly…. .❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:::::!b1237……

  • Eg Kbbs

    And this would be the Gonzales that drank the repub Kool-Ade so much that he stretched the constitution to justify all sorts of novel theories, such as supporting torture ? Yet, even he can’t swallow the current rhetoric