In an interview with Huffington Post, Grothman said:
Right now in Wisconsin, you’re not supposed to work seven days in a row, which is a little ridiculous because all sorts of people want to work seven days a week.
Rep. Grothman also believes homosexuality is a choice, and in 2010, wanted to do away with all sex-ed classes, because he believed some teachers had an agenda for turning kids gay. And in 2004, Grothman wrote an oped where he shared a “story” he hears over and over again about food stamp recipients:
I’ve interviewed over a dozen people who check out people who pay with food stamps and all felt people on food stamps ate better-or at least more costly-than they did. A store manager up north says she can tell who is on food stamps and who is not by what’s in their shopping cart. All had anecdotes about steak or lobsters they would have been reticent to buy themselves.
He goes on to promote the lie that because poor people are overweight, we should “restrict” their purchases. None of Grothman’s sources are named; he even quotes a “Washington insider.” It’s like reading an article from The Examiner.
For those of us who survived the Reagan administration, this might ring a few bells. Remember Reagan’s welfare queen and the young buck? The welfare queen was an actual person, known as Linda Taylor, but by focusing solely on only her welfare fraud, Reagan ignored the more heinous of her crimes: kidnapping children. Taylor’s race is even called into question, as you can read here. Reagan, during his first run for president in 1976, told his audience how frustrating is must be for them, standing in line to buy hamburger, when some “young buck” is in front of them, buying “t-bone steak” with food stamps. He backed off that incredibly racist phrase, and began retelling the story using “young fellow” instead. Louie Gohmert has opined at length about food stamps; his”more costly” food of choice was king crab legs.
Is there fraud within any government program? Probably. Are we, the taxpayers, often on the hook for that fraud and waste? Unfortunately, yes. Would we like our $15 billion back? You betcha. Wait, what? What $15 billion? Food stamp fraud costs us $15 billion?
No, that’s the amount of money the Pentagon lost in the Iraq war. Lost. Poof. No one can find it. From Mother Jones:
The IG report details how $135 million was paid to the governments of the United Kingdom, South Korea, Poland, and others contributing troops to Iraq without any mechanism for determining how it was used. Another $1.8 billion in seized Iraqi assets were also simply given away, without any accountability. IG investigators examined 53 payment invoices. Not one made note of the money’s ultimate destination.
Together with a separate Pentagon IG report released last November, which showed the Defense Department could not account for at least $5 billion issued to Iraqi security forces (causing it to lose track of nearly all of the 13,508 rifles, machine guns, and RPGs it provided to Iraqi troops), today’s report sets the new total of Pentagon Iraq funds lost or stolen at almost $15 billion.
In 2013, Reuters investigated what they called “The Pentagon’s doctored ledgers.” Journalist Gary Cameron spoke with a woman named Linda Woodford, who detailed her job with the U.S Department of Defense: inserting phony numbers into DOD accounts.
The data flooded in just two days before deadline. As the clock ticked down, Woodford says, staff were able to resolve a lot of the false entries through hurried calls and emails to Navy personnel, but many mystery numbers remained. For those, Woodford and her colleagues were told by superiors to take “unsubstantiated change actions” – in other words, enter false numbers, commonly called “plugs,” to make the Navy’s totals match the Treasury’s.
Reuters points out the Defense Department’s 2012 budget was $565.8 billion, “more than the annual defense budgets of the 10 next largest military spenders combined, including Russia and China. How much of that money is spent as intended is impossible to determine.” Impossible to determine.
No, the real problem is “young bucks” buying t-bone steak, or anonymous cashiers who can always tell who’s on food stamps because those people only buy lobster. Politicians who don’t understand that cheap food is filled with saturated fats, sodium, and sugar, all of which lead to obesity. Politicians like Glenn Grothman. Wouldn’t it be interesting to challenge Rep. Grothman to live for a month on food stamps? Have his constituents follow him around as he grabs t-bone steaks, lobster, and king crab legs.
While Reuters was looking into the insane amount of waste and fraud at the Pentagon, that same year, Fox was interviewing a surfer, and using him as the poster child for everything wrong with food stamps. During that report, libertarian political scientist, and noted white nationalist, Charles Murray said the stigma surrounding food stamps is a good thing, a necessary evil. Wasn’t it Jesus who said “Blessed are those who shame the poor, and cut their access to food, and blame them for being overweight, while dancing cheek to cheek with ConAgra and ADM, taking lavish vacations, and using taxpayer money to decorate an office like ‘Downtown Abbey.'”?
It’s easy to blame the poor for everything. A single parent can’t afford their very own politician, or PR team. The elderly couple living on meager Social Security, who rely on heating assistance to make it through the winter, or the homeless veteran, dependent on food banks, have no power. So many conservatives attack the least of us, while ignoring the powerful who scam the system every single day.
There is no shame in being poor, in having to ask for help. There is a lot of shame in being someone like Glenn Grothman.