Despite the obvious flaws of our Founding Fathers, it’s almost undeniable that these men crafted one of the greatest living documents in human history when they wrote our Constitution. That being said, this was also a document that was completely flawed from the beginning. It’s also structured a government for a society that no longer exists.
When this nation was founded we had thirteen states and a total population that was around half of what we currently have in just New York City alone. We had 65 members of the House of Representatives, 26 senators (91 total members of Congress) and one president.
But now we have fifty states, a population around 316 million, 435 members of the House of Representatives, 100 senators and still one president.
Who in their right mind thinks having 535 members of Congress is a good idea? How does anyone expect to get anything done by having that many politicians running our government? Especially when you factor in gerrymandering of House districts that unethically gives more power to one party. If you look at last year’s elections, Republicans won handily. But they only won the overall popular vote by around 4.4 million votes, yet they control the House of Representatives by 59 seats.
In other words, 59 seats have basically been given to 4.4 million Americans. To show how messed up that is, Kentucky has a population of around 4.4 million – yet only has 6 House seats. Because of gerrymandering, around 53 seats aren’t accurately being represented in Congress.
To put that into even another perspective, the states of Texas and New York are given 63 House seats combined (only 4 more than the current GOP advantage in the House), yet have a combined population of 46 million.
While Republicans should control the majority because they won the overall popular vote (though they didn’t win it in 2012 despite still maintaining control of the House), they damn sure shouldn’t have a 59 seat advantage when they only won it by 4.4 million votes.
Then there’s the Senate. The Senate is much simpler – every state, no matter the size, is given two senators.
The theory behind our government was that the House represented the population, giving bigger states more power than smaller ones due to population variances, with the Senate giving equal power to all states, regardless of size.
Sounds great, right?
And it was – in 1789 when we only had 13 states.
Currently we have 24 states with 5 or fewer House representatives that only account for 65 total House members combined. To put it another way, these 24 states combine for a total population right around that of New York and Texas. Yet when you look at the make up of the Senate, those 24 states give us 48 senators whereas Texas and New York only give us 4.
Meaning that when it comes to the Senate, a state like Wyoming with a population of less than 600k, has as much power as New York despite having less than half the amount of people living in just the Bronx alone.
Based on that setup, how could our Senate ever really represent “the American people” in today’s modern society? What the Senate was meant to do was to give each state an equal representation in government, but that’s when we had thirteen states and our population was much more evenly distributed. Now it’s giving more power to whatever political party controls each state, and the most states overall. In Texas, millions of Democrats aren’t represented in the Senate because there are simply more Republicans. In California you find the same issue, only it’s Democrats who control those two seats where millions of conservatives have no voice.
But in a society of 50 states, the Senate is increasingly becoming about geographic boundaries drawn up by humans rather than a real representation of the American people. Basically, those of us who don’t want to live in states such as North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska, Wyoming, Delaware, Maine, Idaho, Kansas, Oklahoma or Mississippi are giving more power to those states as more and more people move to states like Florida, Texas and California.
Because no matter how few people live in states such as Wyoming, North Dakota, Idaho or Kansas – they will always have two senators each.
For just a hypothetical situation, say 95 percent of our population moved into California, Texas, Illinois, Florida and New York. That would give the entire power of our Senate to just 5 percent of our population living in the other 45 states. Meaning that 90 of our Senators would be voted into office by just 5 percent of Americans.
And while those numbers are exaggerated some, it’s a decent representation of what we’re seeing now. Because currently, around half of our Senate is comprised of senators from 24 states that represent a fairly small percentage of overall population.
Now, when we had just 13 states, the way we structured the Senate was great. But now with 50 states, it’s essentially becoming an unbalanced mess where an entire chamber of our Congress has the potential to be controlled by just a fraction of our population.
And as we become more partisan in this country, with some states becoming “solidly red/blue,” we’re also approaching a point where no matter what the vast majority of the American people want – it’s not going to matter. Because if 40 million people in New York, California and Florida want one thing, but 5 million people in North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, Wyoming, Idaho, Alaska and Mississippi want another…that’s 6 vs. 14 in the Senate.
Then when you add in gerrymandering, where House representation isn’t being figured accurately based upon the overall popular vote, it’s hard to deny that our structure of government is incredibly broken.
Because, right now, we have a House of Representatives that’s given a 59 seat advantage to a party that only won the overall popular vote by 4.4 million votes and a Senate that could very easily become about nothing more than which party controls more states.
If you’re being honest with yourself, you damn sure know that’s not how our government is supposed to work.
Latest posts by Allen Clifton (see all)
- To Those Blaming Democrats for the Government Shutdown: You’re Out of Your Damn Minds - January 21, 2018
- Not a Joke: GOP Rep. Tries to Blame Government Shutdown on Barack Obama (Video) - January 21, 2018
- 5 Things the Government Shutdown Proves About Donald Trump and the Republican Party - January 21, 2018