I’ve never been a fan of Howard Stern. While I know he’s very popular with some people, I’ve never quite understood why. Then again, I have no idea why people give a damn what any of the Kardashians are doing, either — yet millions of people seem enamored with them.
Well, Stern decided to weigh in on the Orlando massacre, terrorism, guns and gun regulations by proving what an absolute idiot he is concerning all four topics.
“I can’t believe these people would come out afterward and their answer to Orlando is to take away guns from the public. It’s f***ing mind-blowing to me.”
So, it’s “mind-blowing” for Stern to try to understand why people are finally growing sick and tired of mass shootings, many of which are being carried out by semi-automatic assault weapons that can pump out around 45-rounds per minute? And it’s “mind-blowing” that people might be appalled at the reality in this country that there are people on terror watch lists who can legally purchase guns?
“In France, they have the tightest gun control laws on the planet. The terrorists all had AR-15, they had glocks, they have every kind of pistol, they have missile launchers.”
This is an argument that’s been made by so many pro-gun fanatics that only proves how small-minded their thinking is. Sure, France has incredibly tight regulations on guns which means pretty much everywhere in the country is a “gun-free zone.” Furthermore, yes, 130 people died the night of those horrific attacks. Both of those statements are absolutely true.
However, France also has a fraction of our gun violence problem. Even when you account for that tragic attack last November, I think France would happily trade that problem for the thousands who die every single year in the United States because of our ridiculously lax gun laws. Granted, all gun-related deaths are tragic, but it’s absolutely absurd to claim France should invite our level of gun violence into their country so that people can “defend themselves” against a potential terrorist attack — when the 300+ million guns we have do nothing but place us atop the list for gun-related violence in the modernized world.
“I’m going to tell you about the most gun-free zone on the planet: it happened during 9/11, it was on a plane. You know you can’t get a gun on a plane, it’s completely gun-free.”
Yes, that’s Howard Stern saying that people should be allowed to carry guns with them on planes. Because, you know, what could go wrong with that?
“‘This is great, we’ll just kill the sheep with box-cutters.’ They went on the plane with box-cutters, and all the sheep went ‘Baaaaaaaaaa.'”
Again, Howard Stern complaining because people aren’t allowed to carry guns on planes, while insinuating that if they had been, 9/11 wouldn’t have happened. Who cares about all the other horrific things that would come with people having loaded weapons with them on planes, let’s just exploit 9/11 to make some sort of asinine point that really doesn’t make a damn bit of sense.
Let’s also not forget that, without guns, passengers managed to bring down United Airlines Flight 93 to prevent the plane from reaching its target. So, what Stern is really doing is calling all the people on these other fights cowards for not doing more — which is appalling.
“Now if there had been an air marshal on that plane, a whole f***ing other thing would have went down. There wouldn’t be no 9/11.”
Actually, odds are one air marshal up against a group of terrorists is probably more of a mental safety net than an actual preventative situation. And in this delusional “utopian world” which Stern describes, if everyone on board had a gun, why would there need to be an air marshal, at all? But, wait, there I go trying to make sense when breaking down the asinine ravings of a buffoon. I apologize.
“Can you imagine if the Jews, at least when the Nazis were banging on the doors, if they had a couple of pistols and AR-15s to fight the Nazis? If Anne Frank’s father had a f***ing gun, maybe he at least could have taken a few Nazis out.”
Forget the fact that this myth about ‘gun control laws helped Nazis rise to power and slaughter millions of Jews’ has been soundly debunked for a while now, the ignorance of his statement is astounding. He cites the one Jewish name from that time he could think of to come up with some asinine, pro-gun fantasy that, had Jewish people just had guns, Nazis would have never risen to power. Apparently the same military force that took over most of Europe, and parts of northern Africa (and damn near the world), would have been completely stopped had Jewish people simply been armed with a few guns. The ignorance of those who say idiotic stuff like this is atrocious.
Look, it might be a bit much to claim Howard Stern’s career is over following these comments (especially considering who he is), but he said a lot of stuff here that was simply nonsensical and flat-out stupid. This delusional rant was downright Donald Trump-like in that it was nothing but empty talking points and lacked any substance linked to anything remotely factual.
No matter how many times I hear moronic comments such as these, I never cease to be ashamed that there are people out there (millions of them, unfortunately) who are naive enough to actually believe them.
Latest posts by Allen Clifton (see all)
- Trump Tweets One of the Most Absurd Things He’s Ever Claimed About Russia - February 21, 2018
- Dear Donald Trump: Yes, the Main Reason You Won is Because of Russia’s Help - February 20, 2018
- Fox News’ Smith Blasts Trump for Being Too Much of a Coward to Condemn Russia (Video) - February 19, 2018