It’s really easy to be a conspiracy theorist. As John Oliver hilariously mocked a few weeks ago, it doesn’t take much skill (or intellect) to concoct a conspiracy or even convince gullible people to believe it. Especially in politics where emotions often run high and seeking out confirmation bias is “all the rage.” So it doesn’t surprise me that the big “story” on Thursday was anti-Clinton people losing their minds over reports that Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch met at an airport in Phoenix, Arizona. Clearly, this get together was orchestrated so that Hillary’s husband and Ms. Lynch could discuss the current FBI probe into the former Secretary’s private sever to coordinate with one another on the best way to “fix” the investigation, so that the presumptive Democratic nominee for president won’t be indicted.
Here’s a “fun fact”: Unless Hillary Clinton is indicted (which most rational people who’ve been following the facts of this situation know is likely not going to happen), anyone who’s anti-Clinton is going to claim that the only reason she wasn’t is because the entire investigation was a sham and the Obama administration is protecting her. It doesn’t matter what the facts actually are, these particular people will never believe that she’s not guilty.
It’s just like Benghazi. Even though the latest GOP-led “investigation” debunked all the right-wing conspiracies against Clinton, and Ambassador Chris Stevens’ family has said that they don’t blame Hillary and it’s “unjust” to continue to criticize her, many Republicans are still pushing the same debunked lies they have for years. I’ve even seen some on the right now suggesting that Stevens’ family is being paid by Hillary to not speak out against her.
Again, it’s very easy to be a conspiracy theorist.
Now, were the optics of this smart? No. Then again, when you’re not contemplating doing anything unethical, the first thought going through your mind probably isn’t, “Wow, this looks shady.” Usually it’s people looking for an excuse to make a big issue out of something, or to attack someone else, who are the ones blowing things like this non-scheduled “meeting” out of proportion.
That being said, I love the “logic” of those who think Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch meeting in an airport is part of some dastardly plan to keep Hillary Clinton from being indicted.
Yes, because arranging a private meeting in a private room where no one might have known that it ever occurred clearly didn’t make as much sense as meeting up at a public airport where people would almost certainly see them — which means the entire world would instantly know about it.
After all, nobody goes to airports, right? Obviously a public airport is the best (and most private) choice to discuss the illegal fixing of an FBI investigation of a presumptive presidential nominee and former Secretary of State.
Personally, I’m “shocked” that anyone ever found out about this. Clearly Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch went to great lengths to try to keep this face-to-face encounter a secret — by meeting in a public airport where everyone there (most with some sort of camera in their possession) could see them speaking to one another.
Or maybe … just maybe what Lynch said about the meeting was true. That it wasn’t planned, and the two just happened to be at the Phoenix airport as Bill Clinton was set to leave Arizona around the same time Lynch’s plane was landing. After seeing each other, the two discussed golf, grandchildren and former Attorney General Janet Reno.
You have to believe one of two things. Either you:
- Take Lynch at her word that the meeting wasn’t planned and nothing email or Benghazi related was discussed. – or –
- Believe two highly intelligent individuals who you believe are working together on an elaborate scheme to illegally fix an FBI investigation to keep Hillary Clinton from being indicted were dumb enough to set up a planned meeting at a public airport where everyone would see them talking as opposed to holding the meeting in private, where it was possible no one would have known it ever happened.
It’s fairly obvious what I think, but I’ll let everyone decide for themselves which of those two sound more sane, rational and logical.
Latest posts by Allen Clifton (see all)
- Rick Wilson Excoriates Trump Supporter: ‘Don’t You Dare Talk About Respect’ (Video) - March 17, 2018
- Everything Facebook’s Doing to Combat Fake News is Only Making the Problem Worse - March 16, 2018
- Fox News’ The Five Advocates Committing War Crimes, Denies Waterboarding is Torture (Video) - March 15, 2018