Poor Marco Rubio Doesn’t Realize He’s 2016’s Mitt Romney

While there are a litany of stories that have been spawned following the Iowa Caucuses, one I can’t stop laughing about is Sen. Marco Rubio’s speech from Monday night. While I’ll fully agree that he was probably just as much of a “winner” that night as Sen. Ted Cruz, he still finished third. But if you listened to his speech after the final results were in, you would have thought he won the whole damn thing and crushed his competition. Again, he finished third – like all the polls had predicted he would.

Here’s a part of his ridiculous speech from Monday night:

So, this is the moment they said would never happen. For months, for months they told us we had no chance. For months they told us because we offered too much optimism in a time of anger we had no chance. For months, they told us because we didn’t have the right endorsements or the right political connections, we had no chance. They told me we had no chance because my hair wasn’t gray enough and my boots were too high. They told me I needed to wait my turn.

I have no idea what in the world he’s talking about. They said it would never happen? That he had no chance?

He didn’t win! He finished third!  

Were his numbers slightly better than most expected? Sure, but not by a whole lot. The last three polls out of Iowa had him getting anywhere between 17-22 percent of the vote: He got 23.

So, yes, he did perform decently – but that’s not because people were rushing to support him and his ideas. He gained much of his late “surge” from voters who basically undecided until the day of the caucus. In other words, he was the “safe” vote.

To put it in another way, he’s 2016’s Mitt Romney.

First, let’s discuss the elephant in the room. Donald Trump seems to have overestimated how much skipping the last GOP debate would hurt him in Iowa, which undoubtedly pushed a few voters toward other candidates. So, while the end results are indisputable, context also matters. Had Trump’s arrogance not gotten the better of him, he probably would have won Iowa.

Let’s also not ignore that Iowa is a state with a large evangelical base of voters and Cruz and Rubio were the top two “God hustlers” who basically became preachers more than presidential candidates in the last few weeks before the caucus.

Though when you get right down to it, Rubio got the “Romney bump.” He got the voters who know Trump and Cruz would probably get crushed in a general election, so they chose the “most electable” establishment candidate. Because if these people really supported his ideas, it wouldn’t have taken them until the day of the election to support him.

With Jeb Bush’s campaign all but done, Rubio is really the only “electable” establishment candidate left (which should scare the crap out of Republicans since Rubio himself isn’t electable). That’s why “late deciders” chose him. They simply went with the safe candidate, which is exactly what propelled Romney to his 2012 nomination. Millions of conservatives realizing that they would rather take their shot with who they thought was the “most electable” over taking a chance with a fringe candidate who would likely get crushed in the general election.

So, while poor Marco Rubio goes around talking about the results of the Iowa Caucus as if they’re some sort of incredible “sign” that the American people are believing in his message, the sad truth is that he’s just this year’s Mitt Romney. Go ahead and nominate him, he’ll get crushed by either Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton in the general election.

Allen Clifton

Allen Clifton is a native Texan who now lives in the Austin area. He has a degree in Political Science from Sam Houston State University. Allen is a co-founder of Forward Progressives and creator of the popular Right Off A Cliff column and Facebook page. Be sure to follow Allen on Twitter and Facebook, and subscribe to his channel on YouTube as well.


Facebook comments

  • csbrudy

    Sorry, didn’t read the argument, but Rubio is far more electable than Romney. First, Romney had a history of making money by throwing people out of work. 2nd, he made the 47 million people statement.
    Rubio will never be that stupid. He is the Democrats biggest danger.

    • 1968_Camaro

      Rubio is not electable because he could not handle his own finances, let alone a country’s. From Bloomberg:


    • cjm69

      I wouldn’t go so far as to echo the author’s prediction that he’d get “crushed,” but the fact is, neither Rubio nor anyone else from this year’s GOP crop is really electable in November. At least, not in the absence of some major scandal or catastrophe discrediting the opposition. Given the electoral math and the underlying demographics, most states’ outcomes are a foregone conclusion. Any Democratic candidate is all but guaranteed as many as 247 “safe” electoral votes out of the 270 needed to win. Any Republican would have to pretty much *sweep* the handful of swing states in order to prevail. And there’s nobody in the GOP crew of Bible-thumpers and self-promoters who could generate broad enough appeal to pull that off.

  • Sunnysmom

    Rubio is marginally less frightening that the rest of the pack, including the top two. When the attack ads start coming, his own words saying he’ll govern with the bible as supreme authority should hopefully scare the bejeezus out of independents.

    • Mona Small

      ❝my neighbor’ s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet❞….A few Town ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a Town ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn More right Here:a680➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsBatch/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦::::a680…….