The Truth About Donald Trump’s Muslim Ban is Scarier Than Most People Want to Admit

Ever since Donald Trump signed his ban on seven Muslim countries, one of the main talking points that’s been used against him (which I’ve also brought up) is that there’s never been a citizen from any of the nations on his list who’ve carried out a deadly terrorist attack on U.S. soil.



What many don’t get is — that’s the point

This ban was the first step. It was nothing more than Trump laying the foundation for the actual goal of his administration: An all-out ban on all Muslims and a registry for those living here. 

Last year when Trump first said he wanted to ban all Muslims, the biggest “issue” even some on his side had with it was the fact that it targets an entire religion. It was extremely generic and difficult to spin without saying, “This isn’t about protecting Americans, it’s about bigotry against Muslims.”

That’s why his Muslim ban isn’t a ban on Muslims, per se, it’s just a ban on people from seven nations — that all happen to be predominantly Muslim.

But they were “smart” to not include nations that have actually had citizens who have carried out attacks on American soil. I don’t mean smart in that I admire this by any means, I mean “smart” in that they know where they’re going with this.

Let me explain.

If the next Islamic terrorist attack in this country is committed by someone from a nation that isn’t on Trump’s initial list, then his administration gets to come out and say, See! Our ban is working! The person wasn’t from one of these seven nations. 

Then — wait for it — they can add more countries to the list.

They’ll spin it by saying “the ban worked,” hence the reason why the attacker wasn’t from one of those nations (even though no one from those nations has ever carried out a deadly attack here anyway — his supporters won’t care), which they’re banking on helping them build support to expand their ban on even more predominantly Muslim nations.

See where this is going?

Even if there’s an attack carried out by someone on his ban list, they’ll simply use it as a call for a stricter ban and “extreme vetting.”



Then if there’s an attack carried out by someone who naturalized here from a country not on his list, they can push for two things:

  • To expand their ban on Muslims.
  • Push for a registry for Muslims in the country.

Not only will they then call for “more extreme vetting,” but then they’ll likely make the argument that the ban isn’t enough — we have to start tracking and monitoring Muslims who are here already.

And what’s the best way to “track and monitor” Muslims? That would be a registry.

While we’re all focused on this ban and how little sense it seems to make, we need to also spend more time looking at what it’s possibly setting the stage for.




Allen Clifton

Allen Clifton is a native Texan who now lives in the Austin area. He has a degree in Political Science from Sam Houston State University. Allen is a co-founder of Forward Progressives and creator of the popular Right Off A Cliff column and Facebook page. Be sure to follow Allen on Twitter and Facebook, and subscribe to his channel on YouTube as well.

Comments

Facebook comments

  • Virginia Liberal

    Do people really understand just how easy it is to Impeach a President?

    • Mrsendmail

      yes, but republicans are the majority in the senate, where it would have to start..

  • EHD

    Well, ever since Oliver North was questioned about the nature of the “King Alfred Plan” back in 1987, we’ve known all about the manned detention centers, fenced-off and ready to be filled in the event of civil resistance to Iran/Contra scandal. Since then, we’ve had a proliferation of sites and plenty of ex-military and 3-letter organization members to man them after 3 wars and 15 years tweaking the Patriot Act. Now we have just the fascist in place for the oligarchy to instigate a need for their use…so, get ready, the time is drawing near.

  • rosemary.dale

    I was paid 104 thousand bucks last year by doing an on-line job from home a­­n­­d I did that by w­orking part-time for few hours /daily. I’m using a money making opportunity I was introduced by this web-site i found on-line and I am happy that i earned so much extra income. It’s so newbie-friendly a­­n­­d I’m just so thankful that i found it. Here is what i do… http://statictab.com/8cx4rgs

  • I’ve profited 104,000 thousand dollars in 2016 by working from my home a­­n­­d I did that by wor­king part time for 3+ hours every day. I followed work opportunity I came across online and I am so happy that i was able to make so much money. It’s very newbie-friendly and I’m just so thankful that I found out about this. Check out what I did… http://statictab.com/dntj48t

  • storey.helen

    I profited $104,000 previous year by working from my house a­n­d I manage that by w­o­r­k­i­n­g part-time for several hours each day. I followed work opportunity I found online and I am amazed that i was able to make so much money on the side. It’s very user-friendly and I’m just so thankful that I found out about this. This is what i do… http://statictab.com/r2tyhgi

  • I got paid $104000 in last twelve months by doing an on-line job at home a­­n­­d I did it by working in my own time f­­o­­r 3 or sometimes more hours each day. I followed an earning opportunity I came across from this website i found online and I am happy that i earned such great money. It’s beginner friendly a­n­d I’m just so grateful that i discovered it. Here is what i do… http://statictab.com/owgxpdb

  • ruthie.brinkley

    I’ve made $104k in last twelve months by doing an on-line job at my house a­n­d I manage to accomplish that by w­o­r­k­i­n­g part-time f­o­r few hours /daily. I followed a money making opportunity I stumbled upon online and I am amazed that i earned so much money on the side. It’s really newbie-friendly a­­n­­d I’m just so happy that i discovered this. Here’s what I do… http://libr.ae/b9eu